Badi, M. H., McMurtry, J. A., & Flores, A. E. (1999). Rates of development, survival and predation of immature stages of
Phytoseiulus Longipes (Acari: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae).
Experimental Applied Acarology, 23, 611-621.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006179323636
Blackwood, J. S., Schausberger, P., Croft, B. A. (2001). Prey- stage preference in generalist and specialist phytoseiid mite (Acari: phytoseiidae) when offered
Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) eggs and larvae.
Environmental Entomology,
30, 1103-1111.
https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-30.6.1103
Canlas, L., Amano, H., Ochiai, N., & Takeda, M. (2006). Biology and predation of the Japanese strain of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae).
Systematic & Applied Acarology, 11, 141-157.
https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.11.2.2
Castagnoli, M., & Simoni, S. (1999). Effect of long-term feeding history on functional and numerical response of
Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae).
Experimental Applied Acarology,
23, 217-234.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006066930638
Coll, M., & Ridgway, R. L. (1995) Functional and numerical responses of
Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) to its prey in different vegeta Ble crops.
Annals of the Entomological Society of America,
88, 732-738.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/88.6.732
Croft, B. A., Monetti, L. N., & Pratt, P. D. (1998). Comparative life histories and predation types: Are
Neoseiulus californicus and
N. fallacies (Acari: Phytoseiidae) similar type II selective ality control of mass– reared arthropods: Nutritional effects on performanance of predatory mites.
Experimental Applied Acarology,
108, 462-475.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/27.3.531
De Clercq, P., Mohaghegh, J., & Tirry, L. (2000) Effect of host plant on the functional response of the predator
Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae).
Biological Control, 18, 65-70.
https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1999.0808
De Moraes, G. J., McMurtry, J. A., Denmark, H. A., & Campos, C. B. )2004(. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Magnolia Press, Auckland. 494 pp.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.434.1.1
Farazmand, A., Fathipour, Y., & Kamali, K. (2012). Functional response and mutual interference of
Neoseiulus californicus and
Typhlodromus bagdasarjani (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in
Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae).
International Journal of Acarology,
38(5), 369-376.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01647954.2012.655310
Friese, D. D., & Gilstrap, F. E. (1982). Influence of prey availability on reproduction and prey consumption of
Phytoseiulus persimilis,
Amblyseius californicus, and
Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae).
International Journal of Acarology,
1982(8), 85-89.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01647958208683283
Hatherly, L. S., Bale, J. S., & Walters, K. F. A. (2005). Intraguild predation and feeding preferences in three species of phytoseiid mite used for biological control.
Experimental Applied Acarology,
37, 43-55.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-005-0358-z
Helle, W., & Overmeer, W. P. J. (1985). Rearing techniques. In: W. M. Helle & W. Sablis (Eds.) Spider Mites: Their Biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Natural Enemies and Control, 1a, 331-335.
Kostiainen, T., & Hoy, M.A. (1994). Egg-harvesting allows large scale rearing of
Amblyseius finlandicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in the laboratory.
Experimental Applied Acarology,
18, 155-165.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353683
Hokkanen, H. M. T. (1989) Choosing an effective biocontrol agant - an evolutionary prespeetive. Acta Entomologica Fennica, 53, 19-24.
Laing, J. E., & Osborn, J. A. L. (1974). The effect of prey density on functional and numerical response of three species of predatory mites.
Entomophaga,
19, 267-277.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02371052
Lester, P. J., & Harmsen, R. (2002). Functional and numericalresponses do not always indicate the most effectivepredator for biological control: An analysis of two predatorsin a two-prey system.
Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 455-468.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00733.x
Luck, R. F. (1990). Evaluation of natural enemis for biological control: A behavioral evaluation. Trends of Ecology Evoltion. In: U. Gerson, R. L. Smiley, & R. Ochoa (Eds). Mites (Acari) For Pest Control. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, Uk, 539 p.
Jervis, M., & Kidd, K. (1996). Insect natural enemy’s practical approaches to their study and evaluation, 1st Edition. Chapman & Hall. London.
Jeschke, J. M., Kopp, M., & Tollrian, R. (2002). Predator functional responses: Discriminating between handling and digesting prey.
Ecological Monographe,
72(1), 95-112.
https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0095:PFRDBH]2.0.CO;2
Juliano, S. A. (2001). Nonlinear curve-fitting, predation and functional n and Analysis of Ecolresponse curves. In: S. M. Scheiner & J. Gurevitch (Eds.). Desigogical Experiment. Oxford University Press. New York.432 p.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195131871.003.0010
Manly, B. F. J. (1974). A model for certain types of selection experiments.
Biometrics,
30, 281-294.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2529649
Marafel, P. P., Reis, P. R., Silveira, E. C., Toledo, M. A., & Souza-Pimentel, G.C. (2011).
Neoseiulus californicus preying in different life stages
Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae).
Acarologia, 51, 499- 506.
https://doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20112031ff .
Messina, F. J., & Hanks, J. B. (1998). Host plant alters the shape of functional response of an aphid predator (Coloptera: Coccinellidae).
Environmenyal Entomology,
27, 1196-1202.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/27.5.1196
McMurtry, J. A., & Croft, B. A. (1997). Life-styles of phytoseiid mite and their roles in biological control.
Annual Review of Entomology, 42, 291-321.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.291
Murdoch, W. W. (1969). Switching in general predators experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations.
Ecological Monographe, 39(4), 335-354.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1942352
Nomikou, M., Janssen, A., & Sabelis, M. W.) 2003(. Phytoseiid predators of whiteflies feed and reproduce on non-prey food source.
Experimental Applied Acarology,
31, 15-26.
https://doi.org/10.1023/b:appa.0000005142.31959.e8.
Norbakhesh, S. (2023). List of important pests, diseases and weeds of major agricultural crops, pesticides and recommended methods for their control. Plant Protection Organization.Tehran, 226 p.
Rezaie, M., Saboori, A., & Baniameri, V. (2017). The effect of strawberry cultivars on functional culticvars on functional response and prey- stage pereference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 5(1), 27-35.
Rogers, D. J. (1972). Random search and insect population models.
Journal of Animal Ecology, 41(2), 369-383.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3474
Rott, A. S, & Ponsonby, D. J. (1998). The effect of temperature, relative humidity and host plant on the behaviour of Amblyseius californicus as a predator of the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae). The Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Council International Conference: Pests and Diseases. vol 3. Brighton. 807-812 pp.
Sabelis, M. W. (1985). Reproductive strategies: In: W. Helle & M. W. Sabelis (Eds). Spider Mites. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Controls, Vol. 1A. Elsevier. Amsterdam. pp. 265-278.
Samaras, K., Pappas, M. L., Pekas, A., Wackers, F., & Broufas, G. D. (2021). Benefits of a balanced diet? Mixing prey with pollen is advantageous for the phytoseiid predator
Amblydromalus limonicus. Biological Control, 155, 104531, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Biocontrol.2021.104531 .
SAS, Inc. (2003). Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc. Cary. Nc. USA.
Shimoda, T., Kishimoto, H., Takabayashi, J., Amano, H., & Dicke, M. (2009). Comparison of thread-cutting behavior in three specialist predatory mite to cope with complex webs of Tetranychus spider mitte.
Experimental Applied Acarology,
47, 111-120.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9205-3
SPSS Inc.) 2012 .(IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Crop
Steiner, M. Y. (1993). Some observations on the quality of biological control organisms used in greenhouses. IOBC/WPRS Bulltein, 16, 165-168.
Swirski, E., Amitai, S., & Dorzia, N. (1970). Laboratory studies on the feeding habits, post-embryonic survival and oviposition of the predaceous mites
Amblyseius chilenensis Dosse and
Amblyseius hibisci Chant (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various kinds of food substances.
Entomophaga,
15, 93-106.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02371627
Tanigoshi, L. K. (1982). Advances in knowledge of the biology of the Phytoseiidae. 1-22. In: U. Gerson, R. L. Smiley & R. Ochoa. Mites (acari) for Pest Control. Blackwell Science Ltd.
Timms, J. E., Oliver, T. H., Straw, N. A., & Leather, S. R. (2008). The effects of host plant on three coccinellid functional response. Is the conifer specialist
Aphidecta obliterate (L.) (Coleoptera: coccinelidae) better adapted to spruce than the generalist
Adatia bipunctat (L.) (Coloptera: Coccinelidae)?
Biological Control,
47, 273-281.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.08.009.
Reis, P. R., Teodoro, A. V., Eto, M. V., & Silva, E. V. (2007). Life history of
Amblyseius herbicolus (Chant) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on coffee plants.
Neotropical Entomology,
36, 282-287.
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-566x2007000200016
Van Alphen, J. J. M., & Jervis, M. A, (1996). Foraging behaviour. In: M. Jervis & N. Kidd (Eds). Insect Natural Enemies Practical Approaches to Their Study and Evaluation. Chapman & Hall.London, 491 p.
van Lenteren, J. C., & De Ponti, O. M. B. (1990). Plant- leaf morphology, host- plant resistance and biological control.
Symposia biologica hungarica.
Hungary, 39, 365-386.
van Rijn, P. C. I., & Tanigoshi, L. K. (1999). Pollen as food for the predatory mites
Iphiseius degenerans and
Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae): dietary range and life history.
Experimental Applied Acarology,
23, 785-805.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006227704122
Vacacela, H. E., Colares, E., Lemos, F., Marques, P. H., Franlin, E. C. (2019). Supplementary food for
Neoseiulus californicus boosts biological control of
Tetranychus urticae on strawberry.
Pest Manag Science,
75(7), 1989-1992.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5312
Walzer, A., Castagnoli, M., Simoni, S., & Liguori, M. (2007). Intraspecifc variation in humidity susceptibility of the predatory mite
Neoseiulus californicus: Survival, development and reproduction.
Biological Control, 41, 42-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.11.012
Weintraub, P., & Palevsky, E. (2008). Evaluation of the predatory mite,
Neoseiulus californicus,f or spider mite control on greenhouse sweet pepper under hot arid weld conditions.
Experimental Applied Acarology, 45, 29-37.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9169-3
Xiao, Y., & Fadamiro, H. Y. (2010). Functional responses and prey-stage preferences of three species of predacious mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on citrus red mite
, Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae).
Biogical Control,
53, 345-352.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.03.001
Yan, L., Mori, Sh., Haroyama, N., HiraL, N., & Osakable, M. (2020). Strawberry pollen as a source of UV‐B protection ingredients for the phytoseiid mite
Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae).
Pest Management Science,
77(2).
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6089
Yue, B., & Tsai, J. H. (1996). Development, survivorship and reproduction of
Amblyseius largoensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on selected plant pollens and temperatures.
Environmental of Entomology,
125, 488- 494.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/25.2.488
Zhang, B. X., Li, D. S., Feng, L., & Huang, S. H. (2007). Research progress of mass production and release technologies of predatory mites. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 23, 279-283.
