مطالعه کارآیی علف‌کش پیش‌آمیخته بروموکسینیل+توفوردی برای کنترل علف‌های هرز پهن‌برگ در مزارع گندم (Triticum aestivum L.) کشور

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 بخش تحقیقات علف‌های هرز، موسسه تحقیقات گیاه‌پزشکی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران

2 بخش تحقیقات گیاه پزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی- سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مشهد-ایران

3 بخش تحقیقات علف های هرز، موسسه تحقیقات گیاه پزشکی کشور

4 بخش تحقیقات گیاه پزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کرمانشاه. سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه-ایران

5 استادیار پژوهش بخش تحقیقات گیاه پزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی فارس. مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع

چکیده

به منظور ارزیابی علف‏کش بروموکسینیل+توفوردی (بوکتریل یونیورسال % 56EC) در کنترل علف­های هرز پهن برگ آزمایشی در قالب طرح بلوک‏های کامل تصادفی با چهار تکرار در مناطق کرج ، شهریار، کرمانشاه و فارس طی سال زراعی 97-1396 اجرا شد. تیمارها شامل کاربرد علف‌کش‌های توفوردی+ام­سی­پی­آ (5/1 لیتر در هکتار توفوردی کمبی­فلوئید)، تری بنورون متیل (20 گرم در هکتار گرانستار 75%)، مزوسولفورون‌متیل+ یدوسولفورون متیل سدیم+ دیفلوفنیکان+ مفن‌پایر‌دی‌اتیل (6/1 لیتر اتللو 6%)، مکوپروپ پی-دیکلوپروپ­پی+ام­سی­پی­آ (5/2 لیتر در هکتار دوپلسان سوپر60 %)، بروموکسینیل+ام­سی­پی­آ (5/1 لیتر در هکتار برومایسید ام­آ 40%)، توفوردی+ دایکامبا (8/0 لیتر در هکتار دیالان سوپر 4/34%)، تریاسولفورون+دایکامبا (165 گرم در هکتار لینتور %70) و علف‏کش جدید بروموکسینیل+ توفوردی (بوکتریل یونیورسال 56% در مقادیر 75/0، 1، 25/1، 5/1، 75/1 و 2 لیتر در هکتار) بود. نتایج نشان داد علف‏کش بروموکسینیل +توفوردی در مقدار 25/1 لیتر در هکتار قادر به کنترل معنی­دار بیش از 80 درصد بیشتر علف­های هرز پهن برگ گندم بود اما برای کنترل علف های هرز دشوار-کنترل نظیر ارشته خطایی (Lepyrodiclis holosteoides)، پیچک صحرایی (Convolvulus arvensis) و بی­تی­راخ (Galium tricornutum L.) مقدار 5/1 لیتر در هکتار و رسیدن به عملکرد مطلوب در این محصول زراعی قابل توصیه است. هیچ یک از علف­کش های آزمایش باعث خسارت ظاهری به گندم در مناطق مختلف آزمایش نشدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Efficacy of Bromoxynil+ 2, 4-D (Buctril Universal 56%EC) as Broadleaf Weed Killer in the Wheat Fields of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Minbashi Moeeni 1
  • Mohammad Hassan Hadizadeh 2
  • Mohammad Ali Baghestani 3
  • Mozhgan Veisi 4
  • Mohammad Jamali 5
1 Weed Research Department, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection , Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran.
2 Plant Protection Research Department, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Khorasan-e-Razavi, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Mashhad, Iran.
3 Weed Sci. Dep. IRIPP
4 Plant Protection Research Department, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Kermanshah , Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Kermanshah, Iran
5 Plant Protection Research Department, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Fars, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Shiraz, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Plant Protection Organization (PPO) has registered seventeen commercial herbicides formulations for broadleaved weed control of wheat in Iran (Nourbakhsh, 2019). Among these herbicides, five herbicides contain one active ingredient and the others have two or three active ingredients including acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzyme inhibiting groups, synthetic-auxin groups, photosynthetic inhibitor of photosystem II, and pigment synthesis inhibitor groups, which are sometimes formulated with safeners (Tomlin, 2009). Previous studies show that existing weed species do not similarly respond to herbicides and therefore the percentage control of some of the weed species is lower than the other species (Ohadi, 2010). These hard-to-control weeds are naturally resistant to herbicides. Thus, new herbicides with several active ingredients are suggested to be used to suppress such weeds. The aim of this work was to find the best chemical treatments against weeds in wheat production based on using new herbicides bromoxynil+2,4-D and comparing their efficacy with the common registered herbicides in the major wheat growing areas of Iran.
Material and Method: A field study was conducted in four regions of Iran, including Karaj, Shahryar, Kermanshah and Shiraz during 2017-2018 growing season. The statistical layout was a completely randomized block design with four replicates. Eight herbicides in 13 treatments were 2,4-D+MCPA (U46-Cambi fluid® 67.5%SL, 1.5 1 L ha-1), Mecoprop-p + Dichloprop-p + MCPA (Duplosan super® 60% SL , 1 L ha-1), Bromoxynil + MCPA (Bromicide® 40% EC, 1.5 L ha-1), Tribenuron-methyl (Granstar® 75% DF, 20 gr ha-1), Mesosulfuron-methyl + Iodosulfuron-methyl sodium+ Diflufenican+Mefenpyre-diethyl (Othello® 75% WG, 1.6 L ha-1), 2,4-D + Dicamba (Dialant super® 46.4 SL, 0.8 L ha-1), Triasulfuron + Dicamba (Lintur® 70% WG, 165 gr ha-1), and the new herbicide Bromoxynil + 2,4-D with six recommended doses (Buctrile Univeral® 56% EC, 0.75, 1,1.25, 1.5, 1.75 and 2 L ha-1).  A hand-weeded treatment and an unweeded treatment served as controls. Weed density and weed dry weight for each plot were measured four weeks after the last application the herbicides.  Wheat was harvested from six m2 of each plot after removing border plots. Wheat grain yield was determined after adjusting the moisture level of grain to 14 %. Data from each region were subjected to statistical analysis using SAS/STAT® statistical software and the means were separated by Duncan (α=5%).
Results and Discussion: The results showed a diverse spectrum of weeds (18 species) at the experimental locations. Descuriania Sophia was dominant in three tested locations except Kermanshah. The next dominant weed species were Galium aparine L. and Centaurea depressa M.B. were present dominantly in Kermanshah and Shiraz. Lepyrodiclis holosteoides and Convolvulus arvensis as noxious weeds, respectively were dominant in Shahryar and Kermanashah. Malcolmia africana and Sinapis arvensis were present in Karaj. Across the experimental locations, Bromoxynil + 2,4-D was efficient at 1.5-2 L ha-1 concentrations for total weed control (85.7 to 91.47%). However, when applied at dosage of under 1.5 L ha-1, its weed control efficiency was lower (63 to 80%). Mecoprop-p + Dichloprop-p + MCPA and Bromoxynil + MCPA with 82% average efficiency in controlling weeds in all the locations, which was in agreement with the findings of some previous studies (Minbashi and Saeedi, 2019). 2,4-D + Dicamba and Triasulfuron + Dicamba were inefficient in weed control (68-72%) across all locations. Bromoxynil + 2,4-D (1.5 L ha-1 and upper doses), Mecoprop-p + Dichloprop-p + MCPA, and Bromoxynil + MCPA  were the most efficient to control Lepyrodiclis holosteoides with 86.99 to 99.19% of weed density.This weed beside C. arvensis and G. aparine were identified as difficult-to-control weeds. None of herbicides showed visual injury symptoms on wheat.
Conclusion: According to these experiments, we found that the Bromoxynil + 2,4-D (1.5 L ha-1 and upper doses) as new candidate herbicide showed good to excellent (85%-100%) weed control efficiency averaged in the all experimental locations and it could be recommended to be used in wheat field after registration process. Due to environmental concern, it should be applied at lower doses. Mecoprop-p + Dichloprop-p + MCPA and Bromoxynil + MCPA were found to be the next two efficient herbicides. C. arvensis, was the most difficult-to-control weed that there was not controlled by new herbicides. L. holosteoides and G. aparine were difficult-to-control weed species.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Density
  • Difficult-to-control
  • Dry weight
  • spectrum
  • Visual injury
1- Anonymous. 2015. Buctril Universal.  Published by Bayer CropScience. AG. Monheim, Germany. p. 165-200.
2- Brown H.M. 1990.  Mode of action, crop selectivity, and soil relations of the sulfonylurea herbicides. Pesticide Science 29: 263-28.
3- Culhari C.D., and Manea D. 2011. Controling Convolvulus arvensis in grain maize and winter wheat in Banat (Romania). Research Journal of Agricultural Scince 43: 21-27.
4- Liebman M., Mohler C.L., and Staver C.P. 2001. Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 548 Pp.
5- Simon M., Simon C.O., Sturzu R., Bodescu F., and Melucă C.R. 2010.  Efficiency and seletivity of various herbicides applied to the different stages in weed fighting and their influence on the yield of the distinct varieties if wheat. Annals of University of Craiova, Series Agriculture XL (1).
6- Manea D.N., Pet I., Inciu A.A., and Stef R. 2010. Control of horse thistle (Cirsium arvense Scop.) in winter wheat crop. Research Journal of Agricultural Science 47: 82-89.
7- Minbashi M., and Saeedi H. 2019.  Management of False jagged-ckickweed (Lepyrodiclis holosteoides (C.A. Mey.) Fenzl ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) In wheat and canola fields. Applied instruction (Reg. No.55750). Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection. Place Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection. 7Pp. (In Persian)
8- Minbashi Moeini M., Baghestani M.A., Ahmadi A., Abtali Y., Esfandiari H., Adim H., Barjesteh A., Bagherani N., YounesAbadi M., PourAzar A., Jahedi A., Jararzadeh N., Jamali M., Hoseini S.M., Nowrooz Zadeh S., Delghandi M., AghaBeigi F., Sajedi S., Javadi B., and Moosavi M. 2008  Analytical approach to weed management of irrigated wheat fields of Iran (from 2000 to 2005). In 2nd National Weed Science Congress, 29 & 30 January. Mashhad. 90.
9- Mirkamali H. 2000. Weeds of Iranian wheat fields Agricultural Education Publication. Karaj, Iran, 268 Pp.
10- Montazeri M., Zand E., and Baghestani M.A. 2005. Weeds and their control in wheat fields of Iran First ed., Agricultural Research and Education Organization Press. Tehran, Iran.
11- Motaghi S., Akbari G.A., Minbashi M., Allahdadi I., and Zand E. 2013. Eevaluation of weed density, diversity and structure in irrigated wheat fields in different climates of Iran. Journal of Agroecology 3(2): 15-34. (In Persian)
12- Mousavi M.R. 2008. Weed Control, Fundamentals and Methods. Marze Danesh Press. Tehran, 491 Pp.
13- Nourbakhsh S. 2019. List of important pests, diseases and weeds of major agricultural products, chemicals and recommended ways for their control. Plant Protection organization, Ministry of Jihad-e Agriculture. Tehran, Iran, 208 Pp. (In Persian)
14- Ohadi S., Alizadeh H., and Mashhadi H. 2010.  Wheat seeds infestations to weed seeds before and after cleaning process. In The 3rd Iranian Weed Congress. Babolsar, Iran. 637-640. (In Persian with English abstract)
15- Pourazar R., and Khalghani J. 2009. Weed control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.) in wheat field. Weed Research Journal 1(2): 73-82. (In Persian)
16- Powels S.B., Preston C., Bryan I.B., and Jutsum A.R. 1997. Herbicide resistance: impact and management. Advances in Agronomy 58: 57-93.
17- Sandral G.A., Dear B.S., Pratley J.E., and Cullis B.R. 1997.  Herbicide dose rate response curves in subterranean clover determined by a bioassay. Australian journal of Experimental Agriculture 37(1): 67-74
18- Soheili B. 2013. Studying Geographical Distribution Map of Weeds of IrrigatedWheat Fields of Ardabil Province. Journalof Crop Ecophysiology 7(2): 159-180. (In Persian with English abstract)
19- Tomlin C.D.S., ed. 2009.The Pesticide Manual (Fifteenth Edition). BCPC (British Crop Protection Council): Hampshire, UK. 1457 Pp.
20- Westra P., Chapman P., Stahlman P.W., Miller S.D., and Fay P.K. 1992. Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) Control with Various Herbicide Combinations. Weed Technology 6(4): 949-955.
21- Zadoks J.C., Chang T.T., and Konzak C.F. 1974.  A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14(6): 415-421.
22- Zand, E., Mousavi, S. K., and Heidari, A. 2008. Herbicides and methods of their application with approach of optimization and usage decrease. Publication of Jehade Daneshgahi Mashhad Press. Mashad Iran. 567 Pp. [In Persian].
23- Zand E., Baghestani M.A., Nezamabadi N., and Shimi P. 2010. Application guide of registered herbicides in Iran. Jihade-e-Daneshgahi Press. Mashhad, 143 Pp.
24- Zand E., Baghestani M.A., Nezamabadi N., Mousavi S.M., and Mousavi S.K. 2012. Application guide of registered herbicides in Iran. Jihade-e-Daneshgahi Press. Mashhad, Iran, 176 Pp.
25- Zand E., Baghestani M.A., Nezamabadi N., and Saeedi H. 2013. Controlling lepyrodiclis (Lepyrodiclis holosteoides Fenzl.) and londonrocket (Sisymbrium irio L.) by triasulfuron+ dicamba and 2, 4-D + dicamba herbicides. Mashhad, Iran. p. 715-719.
26- Zimdahl R.L. 2018. Chapter 16 - Properties and Uses of Herbicides, in Fundamentals of Weed Science (Fifth Edition), Academic Press. p. 463-499.