مطالعه شاخص‌های جمعیت علف‌های هرز مزارع برنج شهرستان‌های استان گیلان

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 محقق اردبیلی

2 موسسه برنج کشور

3 تهران

چکیده

شناسایی علف‌های هرز مزارع برنج به عنوان اساسی‌ترین اقدام در مدیریت علف‌های هرز محسوب می‌شود. با آگاهی از فلور علف‌های هرز خاص در یک منطقه می‌توان در مورد روش‌های مدیریت آن‌ها برنامه‌ریزی کرد و تصمیم گرفت که می‌تواند باعث جلوگیری از تکرار اشتباهات برای کنترل علف‌های هرز در اثر عدم وجود اطلاعات کافی از علف‌های هرز هر منطقه باشد. به منظور شناسایی تکمیلی، پراکنش و تعیین غالبیت گونه‌های مختلف علف‌های هرز مزارع برنج در طول دوره رشد برنج، مطالعه‌ای سه‌ساله (1393 تا 1395) در 481 مزرعه از 16 شهرستان استان گیلان انجام شد. نمونه‌برداری بصورت تصادفی با روش سیستماتیک و مطابق الگوی W با استفاده از کوادرات 5/. در 5/. متر انجام شد. علف‌های هرز در هر مزرعه شناسایی و تراکم، درصد فراوانی، یکنواختی و شاخص وفور آن‌ها به تفکیک جنس و گونه تعیین شد. بر اساس شاخص غالبیت علف‌هرز، سوروف‌ (Echinochloa crussgalli) در شهرستان‌های آستانه‌اشرفیه، املش، انزلی، رشت، رودسر، سیاهکل، فومن، لاهیجان و لنگرود بالاترین شاخص را در بین 66 گونه شناسایی شده داشت. قاشق‌واش (Alisma plantago-aquatica) در شهرستان‌های آستارا و رضوانشهر بیشترین شاخص غالبیت و فراوانی را دارد. بندواش آبزی (Paspalum distichum) از گونه‌های غالب در شهرستان‌های شفت، تالش و ماسال بود که بیشترین شاخص غالبیت را به خود اختصاص داد. اویارسلام زرد (Cyperus esculentus) در شهرستان صومعه‌سرا بیشترین شاخص غالبیت را دارد. شاخص شانون- وینر و سیمپسون در شهرستان تالش به ترتیب با 85/2 و 916/0 دارای بالاترین مقدار و در شهرستان رودبار به ترتیب با 97/1 و 749/0 دارای کمترین مقدار بود. در کل مزارع استان گیلان و در بین باریک‌برگان بالاترین یکنواختی و غالبیت برای سوروف به ترتیب با 7/34 درصد و 1/132، در جگن‌ها، اویارسلام زرد دارای بالاترین یکنواختی و غالبیت به ترتیب با 8/22 درصد و 8/88 و در پهن‌برگان، گل‌آردی به ترتیب 5/14 درصد و 25/66 فراوانی و غالبیت را نشان داد. نتایج نشان داد که در منطقه‌ای با غنای گونه‌ای پایین ولی تراکم بالا به دلیل استفاده از برخی روش‌های مدیریتی خاص، برخی علف‌های هرز غالب می‌شوند. بدین منظور کشاورزان برنجکار می‌بایستی در روش‌های مدیریتی علف‌های هرز تغییراتی را ایجاد کنند. در مجموع، نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که مدیریت علف‌های هرز برنج استان در وضعیت مطلوبی قرار ندارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Study of Indices of Weed Communities in Rice Fields of Guilan Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • mohammad javad golmohammadi 1
  • mohammadjavad golmohammadi 1
  • Bijan yaghoubi 2
  • Mostafa oveisi 3
1 University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
2 rice institue
3 Tehran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The culture of man and rice have historical and profound relationships. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) has an inescapable role in providing food, economy, religion and civilization in many countries of the world. Weeds are among the most important factors affecting crops such as rice. Successful weed control is essential for rice production. Grasses, broad-leaved, sedges, ferns and algae are the weeds of Guilan rice fields. Infestation of weeds in a field can be described by three characteristics of the number of available weed species, the density of each species and the distribution of species in the field. The species in a field are almost constant from year to year, but the other two factors vary greatly in response to the environment, agronomic plans and weed management practices. However, detailed information on the presence, composition, abundance, importance and ranking of weed species depends on weed management strategies with average yield of rice. The objective of this study was to investigate rice weed community richness and composition in the Guilan province, Iran during 2014 and 2016 and their relationships with management.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in Guilan province (between 36° 34' to 38° 27' latitudes and 48° 53' to 50° 34' longitudes), northern Iran, with 14044 kilometer square of area.  481 fields were selected from 10 days after transplantation to the end of panicle formation. Taking the area of each field into consideration, 0.25 m2 quadrats were done for sampling using a W-shaped sampling pattern. The weeds at each quadrat were counted and their genera and species were identified. The Frequency, field uniformity over all fields, density of the weeds in each field, the mean weed density of the visited fields, and dominance of the various species in each region were determined. The Simpson index (D) gives more importance to the common species, but the Shannon-Wiener index (H) puts greater importance on rare species. After collecting the data and making the calculations required for determining the population indices, this information created the main layer in the project, and was then designed in the format of a databank.
Results and Discussion: 66 weed species were identified in rice fields of Guilan province, which belonged to 29 families. According to the dominance index of weed, Echinochloa crussgalli was the highest among 66 identified species in Astaneasharafyeh, Amlash, Anzali, Rasht, Roudsar, Siahkal, Fouman, Lahijan and Langroud. Alisma plantago-aquatica had the highest prevalence index in Rezvanshahr. Paspalum distichum was one of the dominant species in shaft, Talesh and Masal regions, having the highest dominance index. Cyperus difformis had the highest dominance index in Somesara. Bolbosoenus maritimus was one of the most important weeds in rice fields located in Roudbar with dominance index equal to 9.9. Azolla filiculoides in 11 regions of Guilan had the highest frequency among floating and submerged weeds in 16 regions. The green algae were the dominant weeds at Astaneasharafyeh and Masal. In the both of regions of Somesara and Lahijan, Lemna minor was the most abundant aquatic weeds. Najas marina is the herbaceous plant having the highest abundance among floating and submerged species in Roudbar. The Shannon-Weiner and Simpson indices were the highest in Talesh (2.85 and 11.93, respectively) and the lowest in Roudbar (1.97 and 3.99, respectively). Uniformity index in Rezvanshahr had the largest quantity equal to 0.806.
Conclusion: Identification of weeds is the most important action for weed management. Weed flora composition in rice fields of 16 areas at Guilan Province consisted of 66 species belonging to 29 families. Roudsar and Langaroud regions were the most dominant sites with a total of 47 weed species followed by Rasht and Lahijan (46 sp.), Astaneasharafyeh (42 sp.), Amlash (37 sp.), Talesh (36 sp.), Fouman and Siahkal (34 sp.), Roudbar (32 sp.), Rezvanshahr and Somesara (30 sp.), Masal (28 sp.), Astara (27 sp.) and Shaft and Anzali (25 sp.). Ten species, three grass (narrowleaf) species (E. crussgalli, P. distichum, and E. oryzoides), three sedge species (C. esculentus, C. serotinus, and C. difformis), four broad-leaved species (E. prostrata, S. trifolia and A. plantago-aquatica), and one fern species (A. filiculoides) were the most widespread and of the highest abundance. Frequency, density and dominance of weeds according to the rice ecosystem in different regions can be changed. Due to lack of knowledge on identification and effective weed control factors, the weeds population is growing. Therefore, assessing the management role in changing the weed communities structure of species diversity can be useful to improve weed control.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Weed
  • problematic
  • Frequency
  • Shannon-Weiner
1- Agricultural Jihad Organization of Guilan. 2017. Publishing of Agricultural Jihad Organization of Guilan Province.
2- Azmi M., and Baki B.B. 2007. Weed flora landscape of the Muda rice granary in the new millennium: A descriptive analysis. Journal of Tropical Agriculture and Food Science 35(2): 319-331.
3- Bahaar S.W.S., and Baht G.A. 2012. Taxocenosis and distribution of weed flora in the rice field monoculture of Kashmir Valley India. International Journal of Botany 8(2): 73-78.
4- Bambaradeniya C.N.B., Edirisinghe J.P., De Silva D.N., Guntatilleke C.V.S., Ranawana K.B., and Wijekoon S. 2004. Biodiversity associated with an irrigated rice agro- ecosystem in Sri Lanka. Virginia Tech Invent the Future 12: 1715-1753.
5- Begum M., Juraimi A.S., Azmi M., Rajan A., and Syed-Omar S.R. 2005. Weed diversity of rice fields in four districts of muda rice granary area, northwest Peninsular Malaysia. Malaysian Applied Biology 34: 31–41.
6- Booth B.D., Murphy S.D., and Swanton C.J. 2003. Weed ecology in natural and agricultural systems. CABI Publishing, 303 p.
7- Dorji S., Lhamo K., Chophyll K., and Tobgye K. 2013. Weeds of transplanted rice in Western Bhutan. Bhu. J. RNR 9: 43-50.
8- Golmohammadi M.J., Alizade H., Yaghoubi B., and Nahvi M. 2010. Effect of competition Echinochloa oryzoides in paddy of Guilan Province. Journal of Agroecology 2(1): 95-102. (In Persian)
9- Hakim M.A., Juraimi A.S., Ismail M.R., Hanafi M.M., and Selamat A. 2013. A survey on weed diversity in Coastal rice fields of Sebarang Perak in Peninsular Malaysia. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 23(2): 534-542.
10- Hartzler R.G., Battles B.A., and Nordby D. 2004. Effect of waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) emergence data on growth and fecundity in soybean. Weed Science 52: 242-245.
11- Hasanejad S., Alizade H., Mozafarian V.A., Chaechi M.R., and Minbashi M. 2009. Study of weeds density and dominance in Barely fields in Azarbayjan. Journal Weed Science in Iran. 5: 69-90.
12- Jabran K., and Chauhan B.S. 2015. Weed management in aerobic rice systems. Crop Protection 78: 151-163.
13- Kamoshita A., Araki Y., and Nguyen Y.T.B. 2014. Weed biodiversity and rice production during the irrigation rehabilitation process in Cambodia. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 194: 1-6.
14- Kandibane M., Ragurman S., and Mahadevan N.R. 2007. Diversity and community structure of aquatic arthopods in an irrigated rice ecosystem of Tamil Nadu, India. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 6(5): 741-748.
15- Kraehmer H., Jabran K., Mennan H., and Chauhan B.S. 2016. Global distribution of rice weeds. Crop Protection 80: 73-86.
16- Lugowska M., Pawlonka Z., and Skrzczynska J. 2016. The effects of soil conditions and crop types on diversity of weed communities. Acta Agrobotanica 69: 1687.
17- Mesquita M.L.R., Andrade L.A.D., and Pereira W.E. 2013. Floristic diversity of the soil weed seed bank in a rice growing area of Brazil: in situ and ex situ evaluation.Acta Botanica Brasilica 27(3): 465-471.
18- Minbash Moeini M., Baghestan M.A., Rahimiyan Mashhadi H., and Alifar M. 2009. The distribution of weeds of irrrigated wheat of Tehran province using geographic information system (GIS). Weed Journal 4: 97-118. (In Persian with English abstract)
19- Mohammaddoust Chamanabad H.R. 2011. Introduction to scientific and partial principle of weed control. Ardabil University Jihad Publications, Pages: 238. (In Persian)
20- Mubeen K., Nadeem M.A., Tanveer A., and Jhala A.J. 2014. Effects of seeding time and weed control methods in direct seeded rice. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 24: 534-542.
21- Nithya J., and Ramamoorthy D. 2015. Floristic composition and weed diversity in rice fields. Indian Journal Weed Science 47: 417–421.
22- Nkoa R., Owen M.D.K., and Swanton C.J. 2015. Weed Abundance, Distribution, Diversity, and Community Analyses. Weed Science 63(sp1): 64-90.
23- Odero D.C., and Rainbolt C. 2014. Weed management in rice. UF/IFAS Extension. University of Florida.
24- Poggio S.L., Sattorre E.H., and Fuente E.B. 2004. Structure of weed communities occurring in Pea and Wheat crops in the rolling pampa (Argentina). Agricalture, Ecosystems and Environment 103. 225-235.
25- Reed R.A., Peet R.K., Palmer M.W., and White P.S. 1993. Scale dependence of vegetation- environment Correlation: a case study of North Carolina piedmont woodland. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 329-340.
26- Schaedler C.E., Burgos N.R., Noldin J.A., Alcober E.A., Salas R.A., and Agrostinetto D. 2015. Competitive ability of ALS- inhibitor herbicide resistant Fimbristylis miliacea. Weed Research 55: 482-492.
27- Shannon C.E., and Wiener W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication Urbana University of Illinois Press, Chicago, USA, Pages: 117.
28- Tang L., Cheng, C., Wan K., Li R., Wang D., Tao Y., Pan J., Xie J., and Chen F. 2014. Impact of fertilizing pattern on the biodiversity of a weed community and Wheat growth. PLOS one 9(1): e84370.
29- Thomas A.G. 1985. Weed survey system used in Saskatchewan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed Science 33: 34-43.
30- Uddin M.K., Juraimi A.S.M., Begum M.R., Ismail A.A., Rahman D., and Othman R. 2009. Floristic composition of weed community in truf grass area of west peninsular Malaysia. International Journal Agriculture Biology 11: 13-20.
31- Wicks G.A., Popken D.H., Mahnken G.W., Hanson G.E., and Lyon D.J. 2003. Survey of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) stubble fields sprayed with herbicides in 1998, Weed Control. Weed Technol, 17: 457-484.
32- Xing A.C., Qiang W., Ping Z.A., Fen D., and Ming L.X. 2000. Survey of weeds turf in Hangzhou. Acta Agric. Zheji, 12: 360-362.
33- Yaghoubi B., Alizadeh H., Rahimian H., Baghestani M.A., Sharifi M.M., and Davatgar N. 2010. Key paper. A review on researches conducted on paddy field weeds and herbicides in Iran. 3th Iranian Weed Science Congress Babolsar, Mazandaran. Iran, 2-11. (In Persian with English abstract)
34- Yaghoubi B., Zand E., and Joharali A. 2006. New species of Echinochloa a serious problem for Iran paddy. The 17th Iranian Plant Pathology Congress, Karaj, Iran. (In Persian)