کنترل شیمیایی علف‌های هرز پیاز خوراکی (Allium cepa L.) در شرایط محیطی رامهرمز

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شوشتر

2 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی

چکیده

پیاز به دلیل داشتن برگ‌های نازک، عدم قدرت سایه اندازی و ایجاد پوشش روی سطح زمین، شاخص سطح برگ کم، تراکم پایین و رشد  آهسته در مراحل اولیه رشد، قدرت رقابت پایینی با علف‌های هرز دارد. به منظور ارزیابی زمان مصرف برخی علف‌کش‌ها در کنترل علف‌های هرز پیاز خوراکی این آزمایش بصورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در سال 93-1392 در شهرستان رامهرمز انجام شد. فاکتور اول شامل علف‌کش‌های پس‌رویشی، کلتودیم (سلکت سوپر)، اگزادیازون (رونستار)، اکسی‌فلورفن (گل) و اختلاط اگزادیازون+کلتودیم و فاکتور دوم شامل دو زمان مصرف علف‌کش در مراحل 2-1 و 4-3 برگی پیاز بود. علف‌های هرز غالب در مراحل ابتدایی رشد پیاز خوراکی شامل پیچک صحرایی (Convolvulus arvensis)، سوروف (Echinocholea crus galli)، پنیرک (Malva spp) و در مرحله تشکیل سوخ شامل یونجه گل زرد (Melilotus indica)، پنیرک و دم عقربی (Scorpiurus muricatus L.) بودند. نتایج نشان داد که اثر زمان مصرف علف‌کش‌ها بر عملکرد پیاز معنی‌دار نبود، اما اثر نوع علف‌کش بر تراکم و زیست توده علف‌های‌هرز غالب و عملکرد پیاز معنی‌دار شد. بیشترین کارایی کنترل علف‌های هرز به علف‌کش اکسی‌فلورفن (6/91 درصد) اختصاص داشت و بیشترین میانگین وزن تر سوخ (85/11 کیلوگرم در هکتار)، تعداد سوخ (5/215 در مترمربع)، قطر سوخ (53/5 سانتی‌متر) و وزن خشک سوخ پیاز (7/7 کیلوگرم در مترمربع) در این تیمار به دست آمد. تفاوت این صفات در تیمار اکسی‌فلورفن و اختلاط اگزادیازون+کلتودیم معنی‌دار نبود. بطور کلی، مصرف علف‌کش اکسی‌فلورفن در مرحله 4-3 برگی برای کنترل کارآمد علف‎های هرز پیاز و تولید عملکرد اقتصادی بالا قابل توصیه بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Chemical Weed Control in Onion (Allium cepa L.) under Ramhormoz Conditions

نویسندگان [English]

  • Adel Modhej 1
  • Hadi Zarezadeh 2
  • roozbeh farhoudi 2
1 Islamic Azad University
2 IAU
چکیده [English]

 
Introduction: Weeds control has been recognized as an essential action in crop production systems. Weeds,in addition to crop quantity, are effective on crop quality, harvest costs and pest abundance diversity. Onion (Allium cepa L.) cannot tolerate prolonged competition withweeds because of its initial slow growth rate after planting, shallow fibrous roots, and small above-ground canopy for effective soil shading (7, 8). Weed infestation in garlic is one of the major factors for loss in yield and bulb loss to the tune of 40-80% (2, 5, 25). Regarding the increase and development of onion cultivation in recent years, effective control of weeds in all stages of growth stages is necessary in order to increase bulb yield. In all researches, hand weeding has the highest onion yield, but due to increased production costs, it may not be economies. The use of herbicides can be an alternative to lowering costs, lack of labor and increasing onion gain. Herbicides such as Oxyflourfen, Oxadiazone, Linerone and Pendimethalin are used to control onion weeds (11, 15). With evaluation the effect of Oxyflourfen and Oxadiazonon onion weed in the early growth stage, it was demonstrated that the Oxyflourfen after hand weeding had the best weed control and onion bulb yield (7). In general, very limited research on chemical control of onion weeds in Iran and in the world has been carried out. Therefore, this research was carried out to evaluate the effect of three post-emergence herbicides in two application timing on weed control and onion bulb yield in Ramhormoz region.
Materials and Methods:      In order to evaluate the effect of application time of some post-emergence herbicides on onion (Allium cepa L.) weeds control, a factorial experiment was conducted in complete randomized blocks design with 3 replications in Ramhormoz region. Experimental factors included post emergence herbicides (Clethodim 1.5 Lit.ha-1, Oxadiazon 2 Lit.ha-1, Oxyflourfen 1.5 Lit.ha-1 and Clethodim+Oxadiazon 1.5 and 2 Lit.ha-1, respectively) and two different times of herbicide application (1-2 and 3-4 true-leaves stage of onion). Onion seeds were planted directly on Oct.4th and the onion planting density was 25 plants per m-2.Fields received 100 kg P ha-1 and 150 kg N ha-1. The P was supplied in the form of single superphosphate. Nitrogen treatments were applied as urea (46% N). Dominant weeds in time of herbicides application were Echinocloacrusgalli, Malvaspp, Convolvulus arvensisand in time of bulb formation were Malvaspp, Melilotusofficinalis and ScorpiurusmuricatusL..Living weed plants were calculated before and after herbicide application using 0.5×0.5m quadrate, and weed biomass obtained by harvesting and drying tissues at 75 ˚C to constant mass using 0.5×0.5m quadrate at bulb formation stage. In order to evaluatethe efficiency of weed control, below equation was used:
WCE=[(A-B)/A]×100
In this equation, WCE is the weed control efficiency (reduction of weed number in percent), A is weed density before and B is the number of weeds after herbicides application. The evaluated onion traits included: bulb fresh weight, bulb number, bulb diameter, bulb dry weight. Statistical analysis was made using the SAS statistical program. Differences between traits means were assessed using Duncan's Multiple Range Test.
Results and Discussion: The major weeds flora in the field experiment were Echinochloa crus-galli.,MalvarotundifoliaL. and Convolvulus arvensisL. Results showed that the effect of time of herbicides application on evaluated traits was not significant but the effect of herbicides treatments on the decrease of weed density and biomass was significant. The lowest Echinocloacrusgalli abundance and the highest control of this narrow weed was obtained from Clethodimherbicide treatment. Clethodimdid not control broadleaf weeds. Regarding the growth and coincidence of broadleaf weed growth such as Scorpiurusmuricatus L, Malvaspp and Melilotusofficinalis with onion growth, Clethodimhad no effect on these weeds and had the lowest onion yield. Oxyflourfen was the most effective herbicide onthe decrease of weed density and dry biomass (including Malvaspp and Melilotusofficinalis)and resulted in the highest bulb fresh yield, the bulb number, the bulb diameter and the bulb dry weight. It has been reported that the use of Oxyflourfen during post-harvest resulted in the highest number of onion bulbs per unit area, and then Oxadiazone and Fluozifop were arranged in subsequent positions (13). Although the difference of dry weight of bulb was not significant between different application timing, post-emergence application of oxyfluorfen at 3–4 leaf stage resulted in onion.Thus, itwas recommended for effective onion weed control and high economic yield.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bulb yield
  • Oxyflourfen
  • Oxadiazon
1. Ahmed H. 1991. Effect of weed on growth of garlic. Weed Science Abstract. 39 (6): 230.
2. Angiras N. N., Kumar S. and Rana S. S. 2008. Efficacy of new herbicides alone and in integration with hand weeding to manage weeds in onion (Allium cepa). Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research. 34 (2):109-112.
3. Boydston R. 2009. Weed and onion response to multiple applications of goal tender beginning at the 1-Leaf Stage of onion. African Journal of Biotechnology. 9 (42): 7037-7042.
4. Carlson H. L. and Kirby D. 2005. Effect of herbicide rate and application timing on weed control in Dehydrator onions. Research Program. No: 115.
5. Channappagoudar B. B. and Biradar N. R. 2007. Physiological studies on weed control efficiency in direct sown onion. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2: 375-376.
6. Daneshvar M. 2006. Vegetable production. (5th Ed.) Shahid Chamran University. Pp: 461. (In Farsi)
7. Ghosheh H. Z. 2004. Single herbicide treatments for control of broadleaved weeds in onion (Allium cepa). Crop Protection. 23: 539–542.
8. Ibrahim U., Oluwatosin O. J., Ayinde B. T. and Mahmoud B. A. 2011. Evaluation of herbicides on weed control, performance and profitability of onion (Allium cepa) in the forest zone of Nigeria. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research. 9 (5): 611-615.
9. Jilani M. S., Ramzan M. and Waseem K. 2007. Impact of weed management practices on growth and yield of some local genotypes of onion. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research. 13(3-4): 191-198.
10. Karimi M. I., Hassan G., Ishfaq Khan M., Ahmad Khan I. and Bibi S. 2012. The impact of chemical and non-chemical weed control methods on weeds dynamics and on the yield of onion (Allium cepa L.). Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research. 18(2): 255-263.
11. Mburu D.N., Drennan D.S.H. and Michieka R.W. 1997. Weed control in onion using pre-emergence herbicides applied at low doses plus supplementary hand-weeding, p. 187-194. In: Proceedings of the Weed Science Society for East Africa.
12. Monica N. Carciu G.H., Lazureanu A., Ileana C. and Antoanela C. 2011. Herbicides effectiveness on the weed control in Allium cepa culture. Journal of Horticulture, Forest and Biotechnology. 15 (4): 17- 20.
13. Mousavi S., Sabet P. and Bagherani N. 2012. Evaluation of clethodim herbicide efficiency in comparison to other graminicides for weedy grasses control in soybean (Glycin max L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 11(2): 307-315.
14. Qasem J. R. 2006. Chemical weed control in seedbed sown onion (Allium cepa L.). Crop Protection. 25: 618–622.
15. Rashed Mohasel M. H., Rahimian H. and Banayan M. 1992. Weeds and weed control. Jahad Daneshgahi Mashdad, pp: 575. (In Persian with English abstract).
16. Sankar V., Thangasamy A. and Lawande K. E. 2015. Weed management studies in onion (Allium cepa L.) Cv N2-4-1 during Rabi season. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture. 33 (2): 627-631.
17. Sakhavat R., Ghaforzadeh D., Salimpour S., GhanbariBirgani D., Eslamizadeh V. and Khramian M. 2009. Onion production in Khouzestan. (Annual Report) Khouzestan Agricultural Extension Organization bulletin. No. 239. (In Persian with English abstract)
18. Tripathy P., Sahoo B. B., Patel D. and Dash D. K. 2013. Weed management studies in onion (Allium cepa L.). Journal of Crop and Weed, 9 (2): 210-212.
19. Vishnu V., Asodaria K. B. and Suthar A. 2015. Weed management in Rabi onion (Allium cepa L.). Agricultural Science Digest. 35 (2): 130-133
20. Umeda K. and Lund L. 2001. Evaluation of new pre emergence and post emergence herbicides for onion weed control. University of Arizona College of Agriculture. Report, index at: http://ag.arizona.edu/pubs/crops/az1252/.
21. Umeda K. and MacNeil D. 1999. Early post-emergence herbicide weed control in onions. University of Arizona College of Agriculture. Report, index at http://ag.arizona.edu/pubs/crops/az1143/.
22. Uygur S., Gürbüz R. and Nezihi Uygur F. 2010. Weeds of onion fields and effects of some herbicides on weeds in Cukurova region, Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology. 9 (42): 7037-7042.
23. Wall D. 1994. Weed Research Report. Morden, Manitoba: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.p.20.
24. Zand E., Rahimian H., Kochki A., Khalghani J., Mousavi S. K. and Ramezani K. 2004. Weed ecology, implication for management. Jahad Daneshgahi Mashhad Press. (In Persian)
25. Zubair M., Rahman H., Salim Jilani M., Kiran M., Kashef Waseem M., Khattak A. M., Rahim A., Ahmad Khan A., Qayyum A. and Wahab, A. 2009. Comparison of different weed management practices in onion (Allium cepa L.) under agro-climatic conditions of Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 15(1): 45-51.