مقاومت عرضی منفی در توده‌های علف‌هرز دُرنه (Echinochloa colona (L.) Link) مقاوم به آترازین در مزارع نیشکر (L. Saccharum officinarum)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستانَ

چکیده

مقاومت عرضی منفی بر اثر بروز مقاومت به تریازین‌ها در چندین مورد از بایوتایپ‌های مقاوم گزارش شده است؛ به طوری‌که این پدیده منجر به بروز حساسیت زیاد در این بایوتایپ‌ها نسبت به علف‌کش‌های فنیل اوره و سایر بازدارنده‌های فتوسنتز در فتوسیستم 2 می‌شود. بدین منظور، مقاومت عرضی منفی در توده‌های مقاوم به علف‌کش‌های خانواده تریازین علف‌هرز دُرنه در مزارع نیشکر کشت و صنعت کارون شوشتر پژوهشی در طی سال‌های 94-1393 با استفاده از آزمایش‌های گلدانی در دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج آزمایش غربال اولیه براساس شاخص‌های اندازه‌گیری شده نشان داد سه توده به علف‌کش آترازین مقاوم بودند. همچنین، نتایج بدست آمده از آزمایش دز- پاسخ بر مبنای شاخص مقاومت توده‌ها نشان داد که توده‌های R1، R2 و R3 به ترتیب با درجاتی بین تا 26/12، 59/6 و 75/3 بر مبنای وزن تر و 37/5، 22/4 و 71/4 تعداد گیاهان زنده مانده به علف‌کش آترازین مقاوم بودند. نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش مقاومت عرضی منفی توده‌های دُرنه مقاوم به علف‌کش آترازین را نسبت به علف‌کش‌های تبوتیورون، لینورون، دایورون و دایورون+ هگزازینون را در محدوده بین 56/0 تا 62/1بر مبنای وزن تر و بین 52/0 تا 26/3 بر مبنای تعداد گیاهان زنده مانده نشان داد. همچنین، توده‌های مقاوم بیشترین مقاومت عرضی منفی (حساسیت) را نسبت به علف‌کش دایورون + هگزازینون نشان دادند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Negative cross resistance in atrazine resistant junglerice (Echinochloa colona (L.) Link) populations in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) fields

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elham Elahifard
  • Narges Shamshirgarzadeh
  • Alireza Abdali Mashhadi
  • Mohammad Reza Moradi Telavat
Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khouzestan
چکیده [English]

Introduction Negative and positive cross-resistance to other herbicides have been found in triazine-resistant biotypes. Thus, negative cross-resistance has been reported to bentazone for Brassica napus L. and A. retroflexus L., and to pyridate for B. napus and Epilobium ciliatum Raf.. In contrast, positive cross-resistance to bentazone has been found in Chenopodium album L. and Solanum nigrum L.. Negative cross-resistance, i.e., herbicide-resistant plants being more sensitive to herbicides than susceptible plants, has been documented in several triazine-resistant weed biotypes. The goal of this study was to search for herbicides that exert negative cross-resistance at the whole-plant level for control of atrazine-resistant populations of E. colona.
Materials and Methods Suspected resistant and susceptible seeds of junglerice to atrazine were collected from sugarcane fields and adjacent areas of Karun Agro-Industry Inc., Shushtar, southwestern of Iran in 2014 - 2015 growing season. These populations were named according to their population status and abbreviated as follows: R1, R2, R3 and S (susceptible population). All the collected seeds (R- and S-populations) were stored at room temperature (25 oC). Herbicides were tebuthiuron, linuron, diuron and diuron + hexazinone. For the PRE application, 10 seeds were planted in 500-ml plastic pots containing clay:sand mix, and herbicides were applied using an flood nozzle and back sprayer calibrated to deliver 350 L ha-1 to the suspected resistant and susceptible junglerice biotypes 1 d after sowing. Plants were thinned to 4 plants per pot. The aboveground biomass was harvested 28 DAT, dried at 75 °C for 48 h, and weighed. The aboveground biomass data were expressed as a percentage of the untreated control. The experiment was a completely randomized block design with four replications and was repeated. The data were analyzed using a nonlinear regression model and R software (drc add on packeges), the three and four parameters log-logistic equation was fitted to the data to describe the responses of the populations to herbicides: susceptible population was estimated as an index in order to compare the resistance levels of the tested populations.
Results and Discussion The result of screening test showed that 3 populations were resistant to atrazine. The results of dose-response assay using atrazine revealed that resistance factor of R1, R2 and R3 populations were 12.26, 6.59 and 3.75 based on wet weight (% of control) and 5.37, 4.22 and 4.71 based on number of survival plants (% of control), respectively. The ED50 values of the R1, R2 and R3 populations were 36.85, 73.01 and 41.71 g ai ha-1 compared with 44.42 g ai ha-1 of the S-populaton of tebuthiuron. The Rf of the R1, R2 and R3 populations were 0.80, 1.53 and 0.72 of tebuthiuron, respectively. The ED50 values of the R1, R2 and R3 populations were 92.76, 107.73 and 106.84 g ai ha-1 compared with 152.51 g ai ha-1 of the S-populaton of linuron. The Rf of the R1, R2 and R3 populations were 1, 1.89 and 3.26 of tebuthiuron, respectively. The ED50 values of the R1, R2 and R3 populations were 74.21, 95.25 and 69.80 g ai ha-1 compared with 79.03 g ai ha-1 of the S-populaton of diuron. The Rf of the R1, R2 and R3 populations were 0.97, 0.85 and 1.18 of diuron, respectively. The ED50 values of the R1, R2 and R3 populations were 62.11, 49.48 and 54.30 g ai ha-1 compared with 88.72 g ai ha-1 of the S-populaton of diuron+hexazinone. The Rf of the R1, R2 and R3 populations were 0.62, 0.68 and 0.52 of diuron+hexazinone, respectively. The results showed that negative cross resistance to tebuthiuron, linuron, diuron and diuron + hexazinone. Resistant biotypes, also, showed the highest negative cross resistance to diuron+hexazinone.
Conclusions Some herbicides that inhibit photosystem II bind more efficiently to the mutant triazine binding domain than to the wild (susceptible) type. Triazine-resistant weeds frequently show negative cross-resistance to other photosystem-II inhibitors, such as bentazon and pyridate; triazine-resistant weeds can also exhibit negative cross-resistance to herbicides that do not affect photosystem II. Negative cross resistance may be the major reason that atrazine resistance did not evolve where herbicide mixtures were used, when the mixed herbicide (usually a non-PS II inhibiting acetanilide) also controlled triazine-sensitive weeds. The value of negative cross-resistance linked with the general lack of fitness of almost all triazine-resistant weeds may be greater than we measured herein. The competition exerted by a crop in the field may further accentuate and exacerbate the lack of fitness and further lower the RI.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Dose-Response
  • mixed herbicides
  • phenyl urea herbicides
1- Beckie H.J., Heap I.M., Smeda R.J., and Hall L.M. 2000. Screening for herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Technology, 14:428-445.
2- Chauhan B.S., and Johnson D.E. 2009. Seed germination ecology of junglerice (Echinochloa colona): a major weed of rice. Weed Science, 57:235-240.
3- De Prado R. A., and Franco A. R. 2004. Cross-resistance and herbicide metabolism in grass weeds in Europe: biochemical and physiological aspects. Weed Science, 52:441-447.
4- Devine M.D., and Shukla A. 2000. Altered target sites as a mechanism of herbicide resistance. Crop Protection, 19:881-889.
5- Elahifard E., Ghanbari A., Rashed Mohassel M.H., Zand E., Mirshmasi Kakhki A., and Mohkami A. 2013a. Characterization of triazine resistant biotypes of junglerice [Echinochloa colona (L.) Link.] found in Iran. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 7:1302-1308.
6- Elahifard E., Mijani S., Kheyr Andish S., Kazerooni Monfared E., and Tokasi S. 2013b. Study on dormancy and effect of some environmental factors on germination of junglerice (Echinochloa colona) seeds. Journal of Plant Protection, 27:342-350. (in Persian with English abstract)
7- Gadamski G., Gressel J., and Gawronski S.W. 2000. Negative cross-resistance in triazine-resistant biotypes of Echinochloa cruss-galli and Conyza canadensis. Weed Science, 48:176-180.
8- Gressel J. 2002. Molecular biology of weed control (Vol. 1).CRC Press.
9- Gressel J., and Segel L.A. 1990. Negative cross resistance; a possible key to atrazine resistance management: a call for whole plant data. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C. 45:470-473.
10- Heap I. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. 2016. Chronological Increase in Resistant Weeds Globally. Available at http://weedscience.org/graphs/soagraph.aspx. (visited 10 Jan. 2016)
11- Hoagland R.E., Norsworthy J.K., Carey F., and Talbert R.E. 2004. Metabolically based resistance to the herbicide propanil in Echinochloa species. Weed Science, 52:475-486.
12- Jordan N., Kelrick M., Brooks J., and Kinerk W. 1999. Biorational management tactics to select against triazine resistant Amaranthus hybridus: a field trial. Journal of Applied Ecology. 36:123-132.
13- Moss S.R., Perryman S.A.M., and Tatnell L.V. 2007. Managing herbicide resistant black grass (Alopecurus myosuroides): Theory and practice. Weed Technology, 21:300-309.
14- Mousavi M.R. 2001. Integrated weed management: principles and methods. Miaad Press. (in Persian)
15- Mousavi M. 2011. Weed control: principles and methods. Marze Danesh Press. (in Persian)
16- Pfister K., and Arntzen C.J. 1979. The mode of action of photosystem II-specific inhibitors in herbicide-resistant weed biotypes. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C. 34:996-1009.
17- Poston D.H., Wilson H.P., and Hines T.E. 2000.Imidazolinone resistance in several Amaranthus hybridus populations. Weed Science, 48:508-513.
18- Ritz C., and Streibig J.C. 2005.Bioassay analysis using R. Journal of Statistical Software, 12:1-22.
19- Ryan G.F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Science, 18:614-616.
20- Salhoff C.R., and Martin A.R. 1986. Kochia scoparia growth response to triazine herbicides. Weed Science, 34:40-42.
21- Sayyad Mansour A. 2007. Investigating weed resistance to conventional herbicides in sugarcane fields. p. 78-87. Proceedings of the 2th Conference Sugar Cane Technologists, 17-18 Jan. 2007. Imam Khomeyni Plant and Industry company, Ahvaz, Iran.
22- Senseman S.A. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. Weed Science Society of America. Lawrence, USA.
23- Yirefu F., Tana T., Tafesse A., and Zekarias Y. 2013. Weed interference in the sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plantations of Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2:239-247.