بررسی بعضی از عوامل اکولوژیکی جوانه‌زنی بذر علف‌هرز قیاق (Sorghum halepense (L.) PERS.)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه پیام نور

2 دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

قیاق یکی از مهمترین علف‌های‌هرز مسئله‌ساز در دنیا است. پاسخ جوانه‌زنی و سبز شدن آن به فاکتورهای مختلف محیطی در شرایط آزمایشگاه و گلخانه مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که، خیساندن بذور به مدت 30 دقیقه در اسید سولفوریک غلیظ (98-95 درصد) بهترین تیمار برای شکستن خواب بذر می‌باشد. پاسخ جوانه‌زنی در دو رژیم نوری (روشنایی/تاریکی و تاریکی مداوم) همراه با دامنه دمایی متفاوت ( ثابت و متناوب) یکسان بود. این گیاه در دماهای متناوب 15/25، 20/30 و 25/35 در هر دو رژیم نوری بیش از 95 درصد جوانه‌زنی داشته است. در دمای ثابت نیز روند درصد نهایی جوانه‌زنی مشابه دماهای متناوب بود و این صفت در محدوده‌ی دماهای ثابت 25 تا 45 بیش از 90 درصد جوانه‌زنی داشت. نتایج آزمایش شوری و خشکی نشان داد این گونه به شوری و خشکی مقاوم است؛ به‌طوری‌که، پتانسیل اسمزی و ماتریک لازم جهت کاهش حداکثر 50 درصد جوانه‌زنی بر اساس برازش مدل لجستیک سه پارامتری به‌ترتیب 62/9- و 13/9- بار محاسبه گردید. با افزایش عمق کاشت ظهور دانه‌رست به طور معنی‌داری کاهش یافت. بر اساس مدل برازش داده شده عمقی که باعث کاهش 50 درصد حداکثر سبزشدن دانه‌رست می‌شود 86/5 سانتی‌متر تعیین گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Germination Ecology of Johnsongrass Seeds (Sorghum halepense (L.) PERS.)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Mojab 1
  • mojtaba Hosseini 2
  • MAJID KARIMIAN KLISHADROKHI 1
1 Payame Noor University
2 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
چکیده [English]

Introduction Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense (L.) PERS) is one of the most controversial and problematic weed. It is damaging at more than 30 different crops in 53 different countries. S. halepense (L.) is a perennial weed reproducing by seed and rhizome. Since it produces many seeds and rhizomes, it is difficult to control it. A weed germination plays an important role in attaining a prosper establishment in a typical agri-ecosystem; and this trend is adjusted with some environmental factors such as light, temperature, salinity, pH and soil moisture. If you consider the pattern of germination and emergence of weed species, you will able to provide comprehensive information to develop weed management strategies in the future. Thus, the purpose of current research has been to evaluate the breaking methods of the seed dormancy, effect of constant and alternative temperature, light, salinity and drought stress and burial depth on germination and seedling emergence of Johnsongrass.
Materials and Methods Seeds of Johnsongrass (S. halepense L.) were collected in June 2013 from plants located at the research farmlands of the Agriculture research centre of Fars province in Zarghan town, Iran. Experimental treatments of Breaking Dormancy consist of six level of scarification with 95-98% acid sulfuric (4, 8, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes), in the other one, there were the soaked seeds in the water for 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours, and in the next group the seeds were heated in a 95- 98 boiling water for two and five minutes, and again in the next group, for 15, 30, 45 and 60 days, the seeds were chilled in 3 C, and in the last group, the seeds stored in 3 and 12 months after harvest comparing to control treatment. A number of 25 seeds were transferred to incubators to identify a suitable temperature and light regime for subsequent experiments of germination and determine under alternative day/night temperatures (15/5, 20/10, 30/15 and 35/20 C) and constant temperature day/night (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45 C) in both light/dark and dark regimes. The salt and osmotic potentials were applied in -1, -3, -5, -7, -9, -11 levels and control treatment in order to survey the stress of salt, drought on seed germination and to compare both stress on it. NaCl was applied in the Vant Hoff method to influence salt stress and also PEG 6000 was applied in the Michel methods to affect osmotic potential. In the burial depth experiment, a number of 30 seeds, for 30 days, were laid in the depth of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 cm in plastic vases with 15 cm diameters. All experiments were conducted twice in the form of randomized complete-block design with four replications. Each replication was arranged on a different shelf of growth chamber and considered as a single block in the laboratory experiments. The data of the replicated experiments were pooled for analysis, as the time interaction and treatment was absolutely meaningless. A functional three-parameter logistic model Was fitted to the germination values (%) obtained at different concentrations of NaCl or osmotic potential. Also, a sigmoidal decay curve was fitted to show the seedling emergence (%) values at different burial depths.
Results and Discussion Seed germination was influenced significantly on different treatments of breaking dormancy (Fig 1). Sulfuric acid treatments showed significant difference rather than control treatment. In 30 and 45 min sulfuric acid scarification, germination was recorded more than 95 %. Based on the achieved results it is very probable that the hard seed prevents germination and this issue causes the weed remains stable in seed bank. Germination percentage was not affected by light regime and temperature interaction (both in constant and alternative) (Fig 2a and 2b), the influence of different temperatures on the feature was significant (Fig 2a). The same germination has been seen in all temperatures (both light and light/ dark regime) in all temperature, The more temperature increased, the seed germination increased too. In both regime, at 25/15, 30/20 and 35/25 C (day/night), germination was recorded more than 95 % (Fig 2a). The maximum and the minimum germination percentage of Johnsongrass in light/ dark regime, were accorded in alternative temperature in 30/25 C (99.5%) and 15/5 C (35.5 %) respectively. In constant and alternative temperatures, the germination was similar. In the constant range of 25-45 C temperatures, the feature was occurred more than 90 % (Fig 3a). The maximum and the minimum germination percentage, in light/ dark regime, were recorded in 25 C (99%) and 5 C (0%) respectively (Fig 3a). The experiment on light revealed Johnsongrass seeds was not influential to light, therefore it wasn't photoblastic species and the germination percentage will not exceed through light. The germination percentage could not be decreased by light as a major factor. Accordingly it is reported that Johnsongrass seed was not photoblastic and the light regime had the slightest effect on the number of seed germination. As the matter of fact the temperature has greater importance comparing with light. The deeper the seedling planted, the fewer emergences were accorded. The emergence at the surface of the soil (zero depth) was 83.33% and in depth of 3 cm it was 100%. The minimum emergence for 18.35%, devoted to depth of 8 cm (Fig 5). With an increase in five cm burial-depth, the seedling emergence decreased for 81.65 %. According to the fitted sigmoid model, the depth which caused a decrease for the maximum 50% seedling emergence calculated 5.60 cm. The results showed that weed seedling emergence was limited in depth of 6 cm and over. The decrease in seedling emergence may be linked to seed energy with increasing buried depths. Agronomic practices causing a decrease in seed germination and an increase seed death is able to help the weed management. Our study model proved that 5.60 cm was the depth in which 50% the maximum emergence decreased (Fig 5) and therefore, tillage more than 6 cm could help reducing germination and emergence of this species.
Conclusions Based on the above results, we come to conclusion that Johnsongrass seed is able to tolerate a variety of environmental circumstances and as soon as providing a suitable condition such as temperature, in particular, it is capable to improve beyond 90% of germination. Salinity and drought stress play no important role in germination. Although, the more increase in depth, the less seedling emergence happens. Consequently one of the best methods of managing this weed is to till the field over 6 cm.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Burial depth
  • salinity
  • Scarification
  • Light
  • Osmotic potential
1- Almansouri M., Kinet J.M., and Lutts S. 2001. Effect of salt and osmatic stresses on germination in durum wheat (Triticum Durum Desf.). Plant Soil, 231: 243-254.
2- Amiri M.J., and Eslamian S.S. 2010. Investigation of climate change in Iran. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 3: 208-216.
3- Atak M., Kaya M.D., Kaya G.,Cikili Y., and Ciftçi C.Y. 2006. Effects of NaCl on the germination, seedling growth and water uptake of triticale. Turkish of Journal Agriculture and Forestry, 30: 39-47.
4- Benech Arnold R.L., Ghersa C.M., Sanchez R.A., and Insausti P. 1990. A mathematical model to predict Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. seedling emergence in relation to soil temperature. Weed Research, 30: 91 -99.
5- Benvenuti S., Macchia M., and Miele S. 2001. Quantitative analysis of emergence of seedlings from buried weed seeds with increasing soil depth. Weed Science, 49:528–535.
6- Boyd N., and Van Acker R. 2004. Seed germination of common weed species as affected by Oxygen concentration, light, and osmotic potential. Weed Science, 52: 589–596.
7- Bradford K.J. 1995. Water relations in seed germination.p.351–396.In: J. Kigel et al. (ed.) Seed Development and Germination, New York, Marcel Dekker.
8- Chachalis D., and Reddy K.N. 2000.Factors affecting Campsis radicans Seed germination and seedling emergence. Weed Science, 48: 212–216.
9- Chauhan B.S., and Johnson D.E. 2008a. Germination ecology of Goosegrass (Eleusine indica): an important grass weed of rainfed rice source. Weed Science, 56: 699-706.
10- Chauhan B.S., and Johnson D.E. 2008b. Germination ecology of southern Crabgrass (Digitaria ciliaris) and India Crabgrass (Digitarialongiflora ): two important weeds of rice in tropics. Weed Science, 56:722- 728.
11- Chejara V.K., Kristiansen P., Whalley R.D.B., Sindel B.M., and Nadolny C. 2008. Factors affecting germination of Coolatia grass (Hyparrhenia hirta). Weed Science, 56: 543-548.
12- Crisraudo A., Gresta F., Luciani F., and Resticcia A. 2007. Effects of after harvest period and environmental factors on seed dormancy of Amaranthus species. Weed Research, 47: 327–334.
13- Elmore D.C., and Paul R.N. 1983. Composite list of C4 weeds. Weed Science, 31: 686-692.
14- Fenner M., and Thompson K. 2005. The ecology of seeds. Cambridge University Press.
15- Ghersa M., Benech Arnold R.L., and Martinez-Ghersa M.A. 1992. The role of fluctuating temperatures in germination and establishment of Sorghum halepense. Regulation of germination at increasing depths. Functional Ecology, 6: 460-468.
16- Gohari A.R., Eslamian S., Abedi-Koupaei J., Massahbavani A.R., Wang d., and Madani K. 2013. Climate change impacts on crop production in Iran's Zayandeh-Rud River Basin. Science of the Total Environment, 442: 405-419.
17- Holm L.G., Plucknett D.L., Pancho J.V., and Herberger J.P. 1977. The world’s worst weeds. distribution and biology. Honolulu, Hawaii University Press.
18- Horowitz M. 1972. Seasonal development of established Johnsongras. Weed Science, 20: 392-395.
19- Huang W.Z., and Hsiao A.I. 1987. Factors affecting seed dormancy and germination of John‌songrass, Sorghum halepense(L.) Pers. Weed Research, 27: 1-12.
20- Israelsen K.R., Ransom C.V., and Waldron B.L. 2011. Salinity tolerance of Foxtail Barley (Hordeumjubatum) and desirable pasture grasses. Weed Science, 59: 500-505.
21- Karssen C.M., Derkx M.P.M., and Post B.J. 1988. Study of seasonal variation in dormancy of Spergula arvensis L. seeds in a condensed annual temperature cycle. Weed Research, 28: 449-457.
22- Kaya M.D., Okcu G., Atak M., Cikili Y., and Kolsarrici O. 2006. Seed treatment to overcome salt and drought stress during germination (Helianthus annus L.). European Journal Agronomy, 24: 291-295.
23- Kelly K., Staden M., Van J., and Bell W.E. 1992. Seed coat structure and dormancy. Plant Growth Regulation, 11: 201-209.
24- Koger C.H., Reddy K.N., and Poston D.H. 2004. Factors affecting seed germination, seedling emergence, and survival of Texas weed (Caperonia palustris).Weed Science, 52: 989–995.
25- Krenchinski F.H., Albrecht A.J.P., Albrecht L.P., et al. 2008. Plant physiological ecology. 2nd ed. Springer Press.
26- Larcher L. 2000. Ecofisiologia vegetal. São Carlos, RiMa.
27- Mcwhorter C.G., and Jordan T.N. 1976. The effect of light and temperature on the Growth and development of Johnsongrass. Weed Science, 24: 88-91.
28- Mcwhorter C.G. 1961. Morphology and development of Johnsongrass plants from seeds and rhizomes. Weed Science, 9: 558-562.
29- Mcwhorter C.G. 1972. Factors affecting Johnsongrass rhizome production and germination. Weed Science, 20: 41-45.
30- Mcwhorter C.G. 1989. History, biology, and control of johnsongrass. Rev. Weed Science, 4: 85–121.
31- Mearns L.O. 2000. Climatic Change and variability. p. 7–35. In:K.R., Reddy et al. (ed.) Climate change and global crop productivity. CABI Publishing, UK.
32- Mennan H., and Ngouajio M. 2006. Seasonal cycles in germination and seedling emergence of summer and winter populations of Catchweed bedstraw (Galium aparine) and Wild mustard (Brassica kaber). Weed Science, 54: 114–120.
33- Michel B.E. 1983. Evaluation of the water potentials of solutions of poly-Ethylene glycol 8000 both in the absence and presence of other solutes. Plant Physiology, 72: 66–70.
34- Mohammadi G., Noroozi N., and Nosratti I. 2013. An evaluation of Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense L.) seed hardness removing methods. Journal of Agrobiology, 30: 83-88.
35- Mohler C.L. 2001. Mechanical management of weeds.p.139–209. In: M., Liebman et al. (ed.) Ecological management of agricultural weeds. Cambridge University Press, UK.
36- Mojab M., Zamani G.R., Eslami S.V., Hosseini M., and Naseri S.A. 2010. Evaluating the effect of salt and drought stress to sodium chloride and polyethylene glycol 6000 on germination characteristic and seedling growth of Barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli Var: oryzicola). Journal of Plant Protection, 24 (1): 108-114. (In Persian with English abstract).
37- Monaghan N. 1979. The biology of Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Research, 19: 261-267.
38- Norsworthy J.K., and Oliveira M.J. 2005. Coffee senna (Cassia iccidentalis) germination and emergence is affected by environmental factors and seeding depth. Weed Science, 53: 657-662.
39- Oliveria M.J., and Norsworthy J.K. 2006. Pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) germination and Emergence as affected by environmental factors and Seeding depth. Weed Science, 54: 910–916.
40- Podrug A., Gadzo D., Muminovic S., Grahic J., Srebrovic E., and Dikic M. 2014.Dormancy and germination of Johnsongrass seed (Sorghum halepense (L.) PERS.). Herbologia, 14:1-10.
41- Ren J., Tao L., Liu X.M. 2002. Effect of sand burial depth on seed germination and seedling emergence of Galligonum spp. Species. Journal of Arid Environment, 51: 603-611.
42- Riar D.S., Norsworthy J.K., Johnson D.B., Scott R.C., and Bagavathiannan M. 2011. Glyphosate resistance in a Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotype from Arkansas. Weed Science, 59: 299-304
43- Rosales-Robles E., Chandler J.M., Wu H., Senseman S.A., and Jaime S.G. 2003. A model to predict the influence of temperature on rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghumhalepense) development. Weed Science, 51: 356-362.
44- Salimi H., and Termeh F. 2002. A study on seed dormancy and germination in ten species of grass weeds. Proceeding of 12th EWRS Symposium, Wageningen, Netherlands.
45- Soltani A., Galeshi S., Zeinali E., and Latifi N. 2001. Germination, seed reserve utilization and seedling growth of chickpea as affected by salinity and seed size. Seed Science and Technology, 30: 51-60.
46- Szabolcs I. 1994. Soils and salinisation. In: M., Pessarakali (ed.) Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. Marcel Dekker, New York.
47- Tang D.S., Hamayun M.K., Zhang Y.M., Kang Y.P., and Lee I.J. 2008. Role of red light, Temperature, stratification and nitrogen in breaking seed dormancy of Chenopodium album L. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 11: 199-204.
48- Teuton T.C., Brecke B.J., Unruh J.B., MacDonald G.E., Miller G.L., and Ducar J.T. 2004. Factors affecting seed germination of tropical Signalgrass (Urochloa subquadripara). Weed Science, 52:376-381.
49- Warwick S.I., and Black L.D. 1983. The biology of Canadian weeds. 61. Sorghum halepense (L.) PERS. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 63: 997-1014.
50- Yang H., Huang Z., Baskin C.C., Baskin J.M., Cao Z., Zhu X., and Dong M. 2009. Response of caryopsis germination, early seedling growth and ramet clonal growth of Bromus inermis to soil salinity. Plant Soil, 316: 265–275.