مدیریت علف‌های هرز و ویژگی‌های رشدی دو رقم برنج (Oryza sativa L.) تحت شرایط هوازی در شهرستان ساری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه زراعت، دانشکده تولید گیاهی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

2 گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

با توجه به مشکل کم­آبی و اهمیت ویژه برنج از نظر تغذیه­ای در ایران، استفاده از کشت هوازی برنج به‌دلیل مزیت­های آن از اهمیت ویژه­ای برخوردار است، حال‌آنکه مهار علف­های هرز در این نظام کشت دشوارتر از شرایط غرقاب می­باشد، در نتیجه بررسی روش­های مدیریت شیمیایی برای کاهش جمعیت علف­های هرز در این شرایط ضروری است. در این بررسی، تأثیر تیمارهای مختلف علف‌کش بر مهار علف­های هرز در ارقام ندا و فجر به‌صورت خشکه‌کاری برنج ارزیابی شد. آزمایش در قالب طرح اسپلیت بلوک با سه تکرار در سال 1400-1399 در مزرعه دشت ناز ساری انجام شد. تیمارها شامل رقم (ندا و فجر) و مدیریت علف‏­هرز در 10 سطح (1- کاربرد علف‌کش بیس­پیریباک سدیم (کلین وید) 2- کاربرد علف‌کش پندی­متالین (پرول) + بیس­پیریباک سدیم (نووینو)، 3- کاربرد علف‌کش پندی­متالین (پرول) + بیس­پیریباک سدیم (کلین وید)، 4- کاربرد علف‌کش پندی­متالین (استومپ) + بیس­پیریباک سدیم (نووینو)، 5- کاربرد علف‌کش پندی­متالین (استومپ) + بیس‌پیریباک سدیم (کلین وید) + بیس­پیریباک سدیم (کلین وید،) 6- کاربرد علف‌کش پندی­متالین (پرول)+ بیس­پیریباک سدیم (کلین وید) + بیس­پیریباک سدیم (کلین وید،) 7- کاربرد علف‌کش پندی­متالین (پرول) + بیس­پیریباک سدیم (کلین وید) + بن­سولفورون متیل (لونداکس)، 8- کاربرد علف‌کش پندی­متالین (پرول) + بیس­پیریباک سدیم (نووینو) + بیس­پیریباک سدیم (نووینو)، 9- تیمار وجین و 10- شاهد آلوده به علف هرز) بودند. طبق نتایج، علف‌های هرز پهن­برگ گاوپنبه (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.)، خربزه وحشی (Cucumis melo L.) و خرفه (Portulaca oleracea L.) شایع‌ترین فلور علف هرز این مزارع را تشکیل دادند. در بررسی صفات رشدی برنج، بیشترین ارتفاع بوته، شاخص سطح برگ و وزن خشک مربوط به رقم ندا بود. میزان افزایش وزن خشک علف­های هرز در رقم ندا کم­تر از رقم فجر بود. در مجموع، شاهد عاری از علف هرز (5607 کیلوگرم در هکتار) و کاربرد سه مرحله‌ای علف‌کش‌ها در مهار علف‌های هرز، موجب حصول عملکرد بیشتری شدند (5000 کیلوگرم در هکتار) و نسبت به کاربرد دو مرحله‌ای و یک مرحله‌ای برتر بود. بنابراین انتخاب رقم مناسب در شرایط وجود علف­های هرز و همچنین کاربرد سه مرحله‌ای از علف‌کش­ها بعد از تیمار وجین در افزایش تولید هوازی برنج بسیار اهمیت دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Weed Management and Growth Characteristics of Two Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars under Aerobic Conditions in Sari Township

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyedeh Shokoofeh Jafarnejad Mozirji 1
  • Javid Gherekhloo 1
  • Sima Sohrabi 2
  • Asieh Siahmarguee 1
  • Saeid Hassanpour-bourkheili 1
1 Department of Agronomy, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
2 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most important crops cultivated in Iran and in particular, North of the country. In recent years, reduced rainfall and adverse conditions of ground and surface waters has raised concerns about the feasibility of flooded rice cultivation method. On the other hand, yield loss by weeds under aerobic conditions is greater compared with the flooded systems, as weeds will emerge simultaneously with rice plants. Despite the more difficult weed management in aerobic rice as well as the limitations in its consequent cultivation in the same field, aerobic rice cultivation system still remains a feasible strategy to achieve sustainable production of rice under the inevitable adverse climatic conditions in the future. Therefore, the present study was carried out with the aim of evaluating the effect of various chemical management methods on weed control as well as growth characteristics of two rice cultivars of Neda and Fajr under aerobic conditions.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted as a strip plot with three replicates at Dasht-e- Naz field, Sari in 2020-2021. Treatments included two cultivars (Neda and Fajr) and 10 levels of weed management including 1- bispyribac sodium (Novino) herbicide, 2- pendimethalin (Prowl) + bispyribac sodium (Novino) herbicides, 3- pendimethalin (Prowl) + bispyribac sodium (Clean Weed) herbicides, 4- pendimethalin (Stomp) + bispyribac sodium (Novino) herbicides, 5- pendimethalin (Stomp) + bispyribac sodium (Clean Weed) herbicides, 6- pendimethalin (Prowl) + bispyribac sodium (Clean Weed) + bispyribac sodium (Clean Weed) herbicides, 7- pendimethalin (Prowl) + bispyribac sodium (Clean Weed) + bensulfuron methyl (Londax) herbicides, 8- pendimethalin (Prowl) + bispyribac sodium (Novino) + bispyribac sodium (Novino) herbicides, 9- weed-free and 10- weedy check. In weedy checks, weeds were allowed to grow until the end of the growing season. Pre-emergence herbicides of Prowl and Stomp were sprayed 2 days after sowing. Also, Clean Weed and Novino herbicides were applied 21 days after sowing. Finally, 35 days after sowing, Clean Weed, Novino and Londax herbicides were sprayed in three-times application of herbicide treatment. Spraying was carried out using a chargeable Matabi knapsack sprayer equipped with a 8003 flat fan nozzle, calibration volume of 200 L ha-1 and 200 KPa pressure. In order to determine the growth characteristics of rice including dry weight, leaf area index and plant height, sampling was done at certain time intervals. Also, dry weight of weeds in each plot was recorded at the mentioned intervals.
Results and Discussion
The greatest plant height in Neda and Fajr was respectively 83.1 and 67.8 cm, which was observed in the weed- free treatment. The plant height varied from 56-73 cm in Neda and 41-60.5 cm in Fajr cultivar in different herbicide treatments. Also, plant height in weedy check in both Neda and Fajr cultivars was significantly lower than other treatments. In both rice cultivars and after the weed- free treatment, the greatest plant height and least time to 50% maximum height was recorded in three- times herbicide application treatments. In the weed- free treatment, leaf area index of Neda and Fajr cultivars reached its peak 71 days after sowing (both at the same time), and was 4.2 and 3.7, respectively. Three- times application of herbicides was ranked next after the weed-free treatment with leaf area indices of 3-3.2 in Fajr and 3.3-3.6 in Neda cultivar. Taking into account the weedy check, weed- free and herbicide treatments, the dry weight of Fajr cultivar ranged from 583.4 to 1640.6 g m-2, whereas these values in Neda varied between 1121.9 to 1968.4 g m-2. The results of this study showed that the most common weeds found in the field were velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.), musk melon (Cucumis melo L.), common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.), barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.Beauv.) and bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.). Weed dry weight in weedy check and in the second place, single- herbicide application treatment was higher and increased more rapidly compared with other treatments. The increase in the dry weight of weeds in Fajr was higher than Neda cultivar. Also, next to the weed-free treatment with 5607 kg ha-1, grain yield was the highest when Prowl+ Novino+ Novino (4994 kg ha-1) and Prowl+ Clean Weed+ Clean Weed (5029 kg ha-1) treatments were applied.
Conclusions
Based on the results obtained from this study, cultivation of Neda cultivar as well as three-times application of herbicides (application of pre-emergence herbicide followed by two- times aaplication of a post-emergence herbicide) is recommended to improve the grain yield of rice under aerobic system.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Dry weight
  • Herbicide
  • Leaf area
  • Weed flora

©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

مراجع

  1. Ala, A., AghaAlikhani, M., Amiri Larijani, B., & Soufizadeh, S. (2014). Comparison between direct-seeding and transplanting of rice in Mazandaran province: Weed competition, yield and yield components. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(3), 463-475. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v12i3.22637
  2. Anwar, M.P., Juraimi, A.S., Samedani, B., Puteh, A., & Man, A. (2012). Critical period of weed control in aerobic rice. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 603043. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/603043
  3. Chauhan, B.S., & Johnson, D.E. (2010). Implications of narrow crop row spacing and delayed Echinochloa colona and Echinochloa crus-galli emergence for weed growth and crop yield loss in aerobic rice. Field Crops Research, 117(2-3), 177-182.
  4. Derakhshan, A., Gherekhloo, J., & Bagherani, N. (2015). Effect of row spacing and herbicide application on the growth indices, yield and yield components of rice in direct seeding. Journal of Crop Production, 8(2), 31-49. (in Persian). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.2008739.1394.8.2.2.4
  5. Esmaeli, M., Ahamadi khatir, M., Abbasi, R., & Kaveh, M. (2022). Evaluation of morphological traits, yield and yield components of different rice cultivars (Oryza sativa) in direct cultivation in competition with weeds. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 32(2), 145-159. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2021.44978.2650
  6. Gibson, K.D., Fischer, A.J., Foin, T.C., & Hill, J.E. (2003). Crop traits related to weed suppression in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L). Weed Science, 51(1), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0087:CTRTWS]2.0.CO;2
  7. Hejazirad, , Gherekhloo, J., Moumeni, A., Bagherani, N., Zeinali, E., & Soltani, F. (2023). Effect of weed management methods on agronomic traits, yield and yield components of Neda and aerobic rice cultivars under seeding and transplanting methods. Weed Research Journal, 2, 39-54. (in Persian)
  8. IRRI (2024). http://www.knowledgebank.irri.org/step-by-step-production/growth/water-management/ faqs-about-water-management/item/difference-between-dry-seeded-rice-and-aerobic-rice. Last accessed: 8 Dec 2024.
  9. Knezevic, S.Z., & Datta, A. (2015). The critical period for weed control: Revisiting data analysis. Weed Science, 63(SP1), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-14-00035.1
  10. Kumar, V., Ladha, J.K., & Gathala, M.K. (2009). Direct drill-seeded rice: A need of the day. Annual Meeting of Agronomy Society of America, Pittsburgh, November 1–5.
  11. Mahajan, G., Gill, M.S., & Singh, K. (2010). Optimizing seed rate to suppress weeds and to increase yield in aerobic direct-seeded rice in Northwestern Indo-Gangetic plains. Journal of New Seeds, 11(3), 225-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1522886X.2010.496109
  12. Mahdavi, F., Esmaeili, M.A., Fallah, A., & Pirdashti, H. (2006). Study of morphological characteristics, physiological indices, grain yield and its components in rice (Oryza sativa) landraces and improved cultivars. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 7(4), 280-297. (in Persian).
  13. Namuco, O.S., Cairns, J.E., & Johnson, D.E. (2009). Investigating early vigour in upland rice (Oryza sativa): Part I. Seedling growth and grain yield in competition with weeds. Field Crops Research, 113(3), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.05.008
  14. Nie, L., Peng, S., Chen, M., Shah, F., Huang, J., Cui, K., & Xiang, J. (2012). Aerobic rice for water-saving agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32(2), 411-418.
  15. Rajabian, M., Asghari, J., Ehteshami, M.R., & Yaghoubi, B. (2017). Response of landrace and improved genotypes of rice to weed competition in direct-seeded system. Iranian Journal of Weed Science, 13(1), 71-87. (in Persian).
  16. Rao, A.N., Johnson, D.E., Sivaprasad, B., Ladha, J.K., & Mortimer, A.M. (2007). Weed management in direct‐seeded rice. Advances in Agronomy, 93, 153-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93004-1
  17. Rashid, M.H., Alam, M.M., Khan, M.A.H., & Ladha, J.K. (2009). Productivity and resource use of direct-(drum)-seeded and transplanted rice in puddled soils in rice–rice and rice–wheat ecosystems. Field Crops Research, 113(3), 274-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.004
  18. Shibayama, H. (2008), Weeds and weed management in rice production in Japan. Weed Biology and Management, 1, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-6664.2001.00004.x
  19. Singh, S., Bhushan, L., Ladha, J.K., Gupta, R.K., Rao, A.N., & Sivaprasad, B. (2006). Weed management in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) cultivated in the furrow-irrigated raised-bed planting system. Crop Protection, 25(5), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.08.004
  20. Sinha, M.K. (2017). Studies on weed diversity and its associated phytosociology under direct dry seeded rice systems in Koria District (CG) India. Advances in Plants and Agriculture Research, 7(2), 246-252. https://doi.org/10.15406/apar.2017.07.00248
  21. Sohrabi, S., Rashed Mohassel, M.H., Ghanbari, A., & Gherekhloo, J. (2014). Phenological characteristics of the invasive weed Cucumis melo. 26. Deutsche Arbeitsbesprechung über Fragen der Unkrautbiologie und-bekämpfung, 11–13. März 2014 in Braunschweig. https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2014.443.025
  22. Sohrabi, S., Gherekhloo, J., & Rashed Mohasel, M.H. (2017). Plant invasion and invasive weeds of Iran. Mashhad University Press, Mashhad, Iran. 192 p. (in Perisan)
  23. Zhao, D.L., Atlin, G.N., Bastiaans, L., & Spiertz, J.H.J. (2006). Cultivar weed‐competitiveness in aerobic rice: Heritability, correlated traits, and the potential for indirect selection in weed‐free environments. Crop Science, 46(1), 372-380. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0192

 

 

ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار