ارزیابی کارایی علف‌کش‌های مختلف در کنترل سوروف (Echinochloa crus-galli L.) و بندواش (Paspalum distichum L.) در کشت نشایی برنج

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گیلان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی (AREEO)، رشت، ایران.

2 گروه تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی مازندران، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی (AREEO)، ساری، ایران.

3 دانشگاه علمی کاربردی، گیلان، رشت، ایران.

چکیده

این پژوهش به­منظور ارزیابی کارایی چند علف­کش در مقادیر مختلف به­صورت منفرد یا ترکیب با هم در کنترل علف­های هرز سوروف و بندواش در کشت نشایی برنج (Oryza sativa L.)، در سال 1400 در مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گیلان انجام شد. تیمارها شامل تیوبنکارب (EC 50%) در مقادیر 2750 و 3000 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار، بیس­پیریباک سدیم (SC 40%) به­میزان 26 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار، تریافامون+ اتوکسی سولفورون (WG 30%) در مقادیر 5/37 و 45 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار، سای­هالوفوپ بوتیل (OD 20%) به­میزان 100 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار، بیس­پیریباک سدیم (26 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار)+ سای­هالوفوپ-بوتیل (100 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار)، مت­سولفورون-متیل (DF 60%) در مقادیر 6 و 8 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار، پرتیلاکلر (EC 50%) به­میزان 875 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار، دو بار وجین دستی و شاهد بدون کنترل علف­هرز بودند. آزمایش در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار انجام شد. نتایج سه نمونه­برداری انجام شده از علف­های هرز نشان داد که علف­کش­های تریافامون+ اتوکسی سولفورون و تیوبنکارب در هر دو مقدار مورد بررسی، بالاترین کارایی را در کنترل سوروف داشتند (100 درصد)، پس از آن، علف­کش­های پرتیلاکلر و سای­هالوفوپ-بوتیل به­ترتیب، زیست­توده سوروف را %90 ≤ و %78≤ کاهش دادند. در ارزیابی کنترل بندواش، علف­کش تریافامون+ اتوکسی سولفورون در دو مقدار مورد بررسی منجر به بیشترین میزان کاهش زیست­توده بندواش (%95≤) شد. تیوبنکارب نیز در دو مقدار مورد بررسی حدود %84 ≤ و پس از آن، سای هالوفوپ-بوتیل موجب %79 ≤ کاهش زیست­توده بندواش شد. در ارزیابی عملکرد برنج، پس از تیمار دو بار وجین دستی، تیمار تیوبنکارب 3000 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار بالاترین عملکرد شلتوک را تولید کرد (5051 کیلوگرم در هکتار). به‌طور کلی، تیمارهای تیوبنکارب 3000 و 2750 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار، بیس پیریباک سدیم، پرتیلاکلر، تریافامون+ اتوکسی سولفورون 45 و 5/37 گرم ماده مؤثره در هکتار و سای هالوفوپ بوتیل تیمارهای کارآمدی در افزایش معنی­دار عملکرد برنج نسبت به شاهد بدون کنترل علف­هرز بودند و با تیمار دو بار وجین دستی اختلاف آماری معنی­دار نداشتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Efficacy Evaluation of Different Herbicides to Control Echinochloa crus-galli and Paspalum distichum in Transplanted Rice

نویسندگان [English]

  • Somayeh Tokasi 1
  • Morteza Nouralizadeh Otaghsara 2
  • Ebrahim Kazerooni monfared 3
1 Plant Protection Research Department, Guilan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran
2 Plant Protection Research Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sari, Iran
3 University of Applied Science and Technology, Guilan, Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Continuous rice cultivation in the paddy fields of northern regions in Iran has led to the spread of weeds such as Echinochloa crus-galli and Paspalum distichum gradually. The presence of these grass weeds in paddy fields leads to waste of water and nutrients and adversely affects on rice productivity. Herbicide application helps for keeping the fields free of weeds during the critical period and minimize the costs of weeding and allows for selective weed control. No repeated application of herbicides or mixed application of herbicides are necessary, because these strategies need to prevent herbicide resistance in weeds. This experiment aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness of some herbicides, including metsulfuron-methyl, tiobencarb, bispyribac sodium, triafamon + ethoxysulfuron, cyhalofop-butyl, and the tank mixed application of cyhalofop-butyl and bispyribac sodium, in controlling grassy weeds in the rice fields.  
Material and Methods
A field experiment was conducted in Gilan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (Rasht) in 2021, utilizing a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications and 15 treatments, including tiobencarb 50%EC at 2750 and 3000 g­ a.i. ha-1, bispyribac sodium 40%SC at 26 g a.i. ha-1, triafamon+ethoxysulfuron 30%WG at 37.5 and 45 g a.i. ha-1, cyhalofop-butyl 20%OD at 100 g a.i. ha-1, bispyribac sodium 40%SC at 26 g a.i. ha-1 + cyhalofop-butyl 20%OD at 100 g a.i. ha-1, metsulfuron-methyl 60%DF at 6 and 8 g a.i. ha-1, pertilachlor 50%EC at 875 g a.i. ha-1, twice hand weeding, and weedy check. Thiobencarb, pertilachlor, and triafamon + ethoxysulfuron were applied in water, five days after transplanting, and cyhalofop-butyl, metsulfuron-methyl, and bispyribac sodium were applied to the weeds at the two- to four-leaves stage, using a knapsack sprayer equipped with a flat fan nozzle. Weed control via application of herbicides was evaluated visually based on the European Weed Research Society rating scale and weed density and biomass were assessed. The yield of rice from each plot was measured. The data collected for different parameters were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using R-studio and the treatment means were compared using Duncan's Multiple Range Test at a significance level of 1%.
Results and Discussion
All weed control treatments significantly increased the weed control efficiency (WCE) over the weedy check. Triafamon + ethoxysulfuron and tiobencarb in both examined doses had the highest WCE in reducing E. crus-galli pressure with 100% control. After that the effectiveness of pertilachlor at 875 g a.i. ha-1and cyhalofop-butyl at 100 g a.i. ha-1 in reducing E. crus-galli density was ≥90% and biomass reduction was ≥78%. There were no significant differences between these treatments in controlling E. crus-galli. The highest WCE in P. distichum control was observed in applying triafamon + ethoxysulfuron at doses of 37.5 and 45 g a.i. ha-1 with ≥91.1% and ≥94.4% density reduction and ≥95.6% and ≥99.8% biomass reduction, respectively; followed by application of cyhalofop-butyl with ≥83.6% and ≥79.7%, density and biomass reduction, respectivelyAfter that, tiobencarb in both doses resulted in ≥72% density reduction and ≥84.5% biomass reduction. There was no significant difference between these treatments in P. distichum control. Pertilachlor was not very effective in controlling of P. distichum; its efficacy was 48.8, 56.5, and 78.4% biomass reduction, in three samplings, respectively. The highest efficacy of metsulfuron-methyl in controlling E. crus-galli and P. distichum was 75.9 and 73.1%, respectively for biomass reduction in the first sampling in the application of 8 g a.i. ha-1. Herbicide application resulted in improved rice grain yield compared to the weedy check. The highest grain yield of rice was achieved with tiobencarb at doses of 3000 and 2750 g a.i. ha-1, yielding 5051 and 4965 Kg ha-1, respectively. There was no significant difference between observed manually weeded treatment and thiobencarb treatments, and also with bispyribac sodium, pertilachlor, triafamon + ethoxysulfuron in both doses (45 and 37.5 g a.i. ha-1), and cyhalofop-butyl; these treatments increased grain yield by 68.4, 65.5, 54.56, 52.8, 39.2, 35.4, 34.6%, respectively, compared to the weedy check. 
Conclusions
The results of this research showed that application of triafamon + ethoxysulfuron at 37.5 g a.i. ha-1 or thiobencarb at 2750 g a.i. ha-1 applied at 3-5 days after rice seedlings transplanting into the water, or application of cyhalofop-butyl at 100 g a.i. ha-1 in the form of a foliar spray in the stage of two- to four-leaf of grass weeds were the efficient control practice for both grass weeds (E. crus-galli and P. distichum) in paddy field. 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • weed biomass reduction
  • weed control efficiency
  • weed density reduction
  • yield

©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

 

https://doi.org/10.22067/jpp.2024.86748.1178

  1. Antralina, M., Nur Istina, I., Yuwariah, Y., & Simarmata, T. (2015). Effect of difference weed control methods to yield of lowland rice in the Sobari. Procedia Food Science, 3, 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2015.01.035
  2. Baghestani, M.A., Zand, E., Lotfimavi, F., Esfandiari, H., Pour Azar, R., & Mamnoei, E. (2014). Evaluation of spectrum efficacy of registered herbicides used in corn. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology, 81(2), 109-122. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/jaep.2014.100369
  3. Barnes, J.W., & Oliver, L.R. (2004). Cloransulam antagonizes annual grass control with aryloxyphenoxypropionate graminicides but not cyclohexanediones. Weed Technology, 18(3), 763-772. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3989372
  4. Biswas, B., Timsina, J., Garai, S., Mondal, M., Banerjee, H., Adhikary, S., & Kanthal, S. (2020). Weed control in transplanted rice with post-emergence herbicides and their effects on subsequent rapeseed in Eastern India. International Journal of Pest Management, 69(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2020.1853276
  5. Blouin, D.C., Webster, E.P., & Bond, J.A. (2010). On a method of analysis for synergistic and antagonistic jointaction effects with fenoxaprop mixtures in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technology, 24(4), 583-589. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00025.1
  6. Buehring, N.W., Baldwin, F.L., Talbert, R.E., Scherder, E.F., & Lovelace, M.L. (2001). Graminicides in programs for broad-spectrum weed control in rice. In: R. Wells Rice Research Studies 2000; Norman R.J., Meullenet J.F., Eds.; University of Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series: Fayetteville, A.R., 2001, vol. 485, 58-61.
  7. Buehring, N.W., Talbert, R.E., & Baldwin, F.L. (2006). Interactions of graminicides with other herbicides applied to rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technology, 20(1), 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-263R.1
  8. Croon, K.A., Ketchersid, M.L., & Merkle, M.G. (1989). Effect of bentazon, imazaquin and chlorimuron on the absorption and translocation of the methyl-ester of haloxyfop. Weed Science, 37(5), 645-650. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4045123
  9. Das, R., Bera, S., Pthak, A., & Mandal, M.K. (2015). Weed management in transplanted rice through bispyribac sodium 10% SC and its effect on soil microflora and succeeding crop-blackgram. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 4(6), 681-688.
  10. Das, T., Banerjee, M., Malik, G.C., & Mandal, B. (2017). Efficacy of herbicides against weeds in transplanted wet season rice (Oryza sativa). IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 10(5), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-1005010103
  11. Dear, B.S., Sandral, G., Spencer, D., Khan, M.R., & Higgins, T.J.V. (2003). The tolerance of three transgenic subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) lines with the bxn gene to herbicides containing bromoxynil. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 54(2), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR02134
  12. Ferreira, K.L., Burton, J.D., & Coble, H.D. (1995). Physiological-basis for antagonism of fluazifop-P by DPXPE350. Weed Science, 43(2), 184-191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500081042
  13. Gibson, K.D., Fischer, A.J., Foin, T.C., & Hill, J.E. (2003). Crop traits related to weed suppression in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Science, 51, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0087:CTRTWS]2.0.CO;2
  14. Halder, J, & Patra, AK. (2007). Effect of chemical weed control methods on productivity of productivity of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 52, 111-113. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v52i2.4903
  15. Jordan, D.L. (1995). Interactions of fenoxaprop-ethyl with bensulfuron and bentazon in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technology, 9(4), 724–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00024118
  16. Kruse, N.D., Vidal, R.A., Bauman, T.T., & Trezzi, M.M. (2001). Sinergismo potencial entre herbicidas inibidores do fotossistema II e da síntese de carotenóides. Ciencia Rural, 31(4), 569-575. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782001000400002
  17. Lassiter, R.B., Simpson, D.M., Grant, D.L., Richburg, J.S., Langston, V.B., & Mann, R.K. (2000). Efficacy and crop tolerance of cyhalofop post-applied in direct seeded rice. In Southern Weed Science Society Proceeding, 53, p.170.
  18. Matzenbacher, F.O., Bortoly, E.D., Kalsing, A., & Merotto Jr, A. (2015). Distribution and analysis of the mechanism of resistance of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) to imidazolinone and quinclorac herbicides. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 153(6), 1044-1058. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859614000768
  19. Nourbakhsh, S. (2023). The list of important pest, diseases and weeds of major agricultural products; pesticides and recommended methods for their control. Plant Protection Organization. Ministry of Agricultural-Jahad. (In Persian)
  20. Ottis, B.V., Talbert, R.E., Scherder, E.F., Lovelace, M.L., Malik, M.S., Lassiter, R.B., & Gardisser, D.R. (2003). Early postemergence tank-mix programs with cyhalofop (Clincher) for residual grass control in rice. In Southern Weed Science Society Proceeding, 56.
  21. Prameela, P., Menon, S.S., & Menon, M.V. 2014. Effect of new post emergence herbicides on weed dynamics in wet seeded rice. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 52(1), 94-100. https://jtropag.kau.in/index.php/ojs2/article/view/310
  22. Prashanthi, C.H., Laxminarayana, P., Vidyasagar, G.E.C.H., & Harish Kumar Sharma, S. (2017). Yield parameters and yield of aerobic rice (Oryza sativa) as influenced by different seeding methods and weed control measures. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 6(7), 2474-2480. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.351
  23. Roshid, I. (2006). Mixed application study of glyphosate herbicide with the metsulfuron methyl in several agriculture weed agricultura control (in Bahasa Indonesia). Thesis. Undergraduate, Bogor Agricultural Institute. 65 pp.
  24. Roso, A.C., Merotto JR, A., & Delatorre, C.A. (2010). Bioassays for diagnosis of resistance to the herbicides imidazolinones in rice plants. Planta Daninha, 28(2), 411-419. https://doi.org/1590/S0100-83582010000200021
  25. Saha, S. (2005). Evaluation of some new herbicide formulations alone or in combination with hand weeding in direct sown rainfed lowland rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 37(1&2), 103-104. https://doi.org/IJWS-2005-37-1&2-29
  26. Sandral, G.H., Dear, B.S., Pratley, J.E., & Cullis, B.R. (1997). Herbicide dose response rate response curve in subterranean clover determined by a bioassay. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 37, 67-74.
  27. Scherder, E.F., Talbert, R.E., Scherder, E.E., Lovelace, M.L., & Buchring, N.W. (2001). Research Series-Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, No. 485, 86-98.
  28. Singh, Y., Singh, V.P., Singh, G., Yadav, D.S., Sinha, R.K.P., & Johnson, D.E. (2011). The implications of land preparation, crop establishment method and weed management on rice yield variation in the rice-wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Field Crops Research, 121(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.11.012
  29. Sondhia, S. (2008). Leaching behaviour of metsulfuron-methyl in two texturally different soil. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 154, 111–115.
  30. Sondhia, S. (2009). Persistence of Metssulfuron-methyl in paddy field and detection of its residues in crop produce. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination Toxicoloy, 83, 799-802. https://doi.10.1007/s00128-009-9822-5
  31. Smaeeltabar, M., Zaefarian, F., Nazari, Sh., & Abbasi, R. (2023). The effect of different weed control managements on yield and yield components of three rice cultivars. Journal of Iranian Plant Protection Research, 36, 4: 453-466. https://doi.10.22067/jpp.2022.74285.1069
  32. Thimme Gowda, P., Shankaraiah, C., Jnanesh, A.C., Govindappa, M., & Murthy, K.N. (2009). Studies on chemical weed control in aerobic rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of Crop and Weed, 5(1), 320-323.
  33. Tokasi, S., & Nouralizadeh Otaghsara, M. (2020). Investigating the efficacy of bispyribac sodium SC42% herbicide in rice (Oryza sativa) weeds control. Cereal Research, 9(4), 331-345. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22124/cr.2020.15096.1539
  34. Tokasi, S., & Nouralizadeh Otaghsara, M. (2021). Comparison the effect of paddy field herbicides in grass weed control. Iranian Weed Science Congress, 9, 402-407. (In Persian with English abstract)
  35. Tokasi, S., & Nouralizadeh Otaghsara, M. (2022). Grass weeds control in transplanted rice with Cyhalofop-butyl. Journal of Crop Protection, 12(4), 433-443. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/1001.1.22519041.2022.11.4.1.8
  36. Zhang, W., Webster, E.P., Blouin, D.C., & Leon, C.T. (2005). Fenoxaprop interactions for barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice. Weed Technology, 19(2), 293-297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3989709
CAPTCHA Image