تأثیر الگو و حجم پاشش بر کارایی هالوکسی‌فوپ-آر-متیل علیه جودره (Hordeum spontaneum)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان

2 گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

10.22067/jpp.2021.67963.1003

چکیده

در آزمایشی به صورت دُز-پاسخ، کارآمدی نازل­های تک بادبزنه و دو بادبزنه 2020 و 3070، هر کدام با شماره­های 110015، 11002، 110025، 11003، 11004 و 11005 بر کارایی هالوکسی فوپ-آر-متیل علیه جودره بررسی شد. همزمان، میزان خیس­شدگی کاغذهای حساس به رطوبت قرار گرفته در سه وضعیت (کاغذ 1 بطور افقی بر روی سطح زمین و کاغذهای 2 و 3 بطور عمودی به ترتیب روبرو و پشت به مسیر حرکت نازل) با تیمارهای مذکور بررسی شد. تمامی انواع نازل­ها با شماره­های 11003، 11004 و 11005 کاغذ 1 را کاملاً خیس­ کردند. نازل دو بادبزنه 3070 با شماره 110015 فقط 3/7 درصد کاغذ 1 را خیس کرد. نازل­های تک بادبزنه و دو بادبزنه 2020 با شماره­های 11003، 11004 و 11005 کاغذ 2 را کاملاً خیس کرد. کمترین میزان خیس­شدگی کاغذ 2 با نازل تک بادبزنه با شماره­های 110015 و 11002 حاصل شد (19-24 درصد). نازل­های دو بابزنه 2020 و 3070 با شماره­های 11004 و 11005 کاغذ 3 را کاملاً خیس کردند. نازل تک بادبزنه اصلاً نتوانست کاغذ 3 را خیس کند. بجز با نازل تک بادبزنه در کاغذ 3، در تمامی انواع نازل­ها، با افزایش شماره نازل سطح بیشتری از کاغذها خیس شد. براساس کارایی هالوکسی­فوپ-آر-متیل، کارآمدی نازل­ها به صورت دو بادبزنه 2020 > تک بادبزنه = دو بادبزنه 3070 بود. اگر­چه افزایش شماره نازل سبب افزایش خیس­شدگی کاغذهای حساس به رطوبت شد، ولی سبب افزایش مقدار ED50، یعنی کاهش کارایی هالوکسی­فوپ-آر-متیل، شد. در بین تیمارها، کمترین مقدار ED50 با نازل دو بادبزنه 2020 با شماره 110015 مشاهده شد (34/9 گرم هالوکسی­فوپ-آر-متیل در هکتار).

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Spray Pattern and Volume on Haloxyfop-r-methyl Efficacy against Wild Barley (Hordeum spontaneum)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Akbar Aliverdi 1
  • Seid Masoud Borghei 2
1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, I.R. Iran
2 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Herbicides should be sprayed on weeds after diluting in water. Since the spray volume can affect the efficacy of herbicides; therefore, selecting an appropriate spray volume has always been considered a simple, inexpensive and available method to optimize the efficacy of herbicides. Changing the sprayer speed and the nozzle size are two possible methods to adjust the spray volume. If a very low or high spray volume is required to achieve optimal herbicide efficacy, the applicability of the first method will be problematic. For this reason, the method of changing the nozzle size always seems to be more feasible.. When a graminicide is sprayed with a single flat fan nozzle, which is currently the most common type of nozzle available to most Iranian farmers, the spray droplets which move perpendicular to the ground are mostly oblique to the leaf surface of the grass, having erect leaves. Hence, it is likely that a large number of the spray droplets bounced from the leaf surface to the soil. A twin flat fan nozzle can create two non-vertical sprays, reducing the possibility of impacting obliquely the spray droplets to the leaf surface. Therefore, the bouncing of spray droplets from the leaf surface is significantly reduced. To date, the efficacy of twin symmetrical and asymmetrical flat fan nozzles has not been compared. On the other hand, the effect of spray volume on haloxyfop-r-methyl efficacy against wild barley has not been evaluated. Therefore, this experiment was intended to fill the gaps mentioned in science.
Materials and Methods: To compare the efficiency of single, twin symmetrical and twin asymmetrical flat fan nozzles under different spray volumes, a dose-response experiment was performed in the Research Greenhouse of Bu-Ali Sina University. In this experiment, seven doses of haloxyfop-r-methyl (0, 10.8, 21.6, 43.2, 64.8, 84.4 and 108 g a.i. ha-1) were used using three types of nozzles (single flat fan, twin flat fan 2020 and twin flat fan 3070) in six sizes of them (110015, 11002, 110025, 11003, 11004 and 11005, which create the spray volumes of 150, 200, 250, 300, 400 and 500 L ha-1, respectively) were sprayed on wild barley at a three-leaf stage. Simultaneously with spraying 108 g a.i. ha-1, another experiment was performed as a factorial in a completely randomized design. In this experiment, the amount of spray settling from three types of nozzles in six sizes of on moisture-sensitive papers was evaluated in three situations. Paper No. 1 was mounted horizontally on the ground and papers No. 2 and 3 were mounted vertically facing the back and back of the nozzle, respectively. 
Results and Discussion: In paper No. 1, in all types of nozzles, more surface of the paper was wetted by increasing the nozzle size (spray volume). In all types of nozzles at 11003, 11004 and 11005, the highest wetting rate was provided (100%). The lowest wetting rate was obtained with twin flat fan 3070 at 110015 (7.3%). In paper No. 2, in all types of nozzles, more surface of the paper was wetted by increasing the nozzle size. The highest wetting rate (100%) was observed with single flat fan and twin flat fan 2020 nozzles at 11003, 11004 and 11005. The lowest wetting rate (24-19%) was observed with single flat fan nozzle at 110015 and 11002. In paper No. 3, in two twin flat fan nozzles, more surface of the paper was wetted by increasing the nozzle size. A single flat-fan nozzle could not wet the paper at all. In general, the performance of the nozzles used in this experiment is twin flat fan 2020 > single flat fan = twin flat fan 3070. In all types of nozzles, with increasing the size of nozzles (spray volume), the rate of haloxyfop-r-methyl is required to reduce 50 and 90% of the dry weight of wild barley (ED50 and ED90) increased significantly, indicating a decrease in the efficacy of haloxyfop-r-methyl against wild barley. As the best treatment, the lowest values of ED50 and ED90, which were equal to 9.34 and 38.21 g a.i. ha-1, respectively, were obtained with twin flat fan 2020 at 110015. Increased efficacy of haloxyfop-r-methyl when spray volume was reduced can be explained as follows small size nozzles create a greater small droplet. Smaller droplets may give better spray retention over the leaf surface, resulting in increased efficacy of haloxyfop-r-methyl. In low spray volume, the higher concentration of herbicide in the spray solution may create a greater concentration gradient between the spray solution and leaf, increasing the diffusion of herbicide into the leaf.
Conclusion: Although the spray coverage increased with increasing spray volume for haloxyfop-r-methyl, it has an adverse effect on its efficacy. Therefore, smaller and more concentration droplets resulted in greater control of wild barley with haloxyfop-r-methyl than did larger and more dilution droplets.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • droplet size
  • Graminicide
  • nozzle size
  • spray retention
  • Aliverdi A. 2018. The selection of proper nozzle for spraying sethoxydim at two wind speeds to control winter wild oat (Avena sterilis ludoviciana). Journal of Plant Protection32(2): 299–306. (In Persian with English abstract)
  • Aliverdi A., and Ahmadvand G. 2018. The effect of nozzle type on clodinafop-propargyl potency against winter wild oat. Crop Protection 114: 113–119.
  • Aliverdi, and Karami S. 2019. The effect of type and size of single, twin, and triplet flat fan nozzles on the activity of cycloxydim against wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum Koch.). Journal of Plant Protection33(4): 465–474. (In Persian with English abstract)
  • Aliverdi A., and Sharifi M. 2020. Interaction effect between nozzle type and application time of day on the efficacy of paraquat to control velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Journal of Plant Protection34(1): 113–23. (In Persian with English abstract)
  • Aliverdi A., and Zarei M. 2020. Forward angled spray: a method for improving the efficacy of herbicides. Journal Plant Protection Research 60(3): 275–
  • American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 2009. Spray nozzle classification by droplet spectra. S572.1, 4.
  • Berger S.T., Dobrow M.H., Ferrell J.A., and Webster T.M. 2014. Influence of carrier volume and nozzle selection on palmer amaranth control. Peanut Science 41(2): 120–123.
  • Brown L., Soltani N., Shropshire C., Spieser H., and Sikkema P.H. 2007. Efficacy of four corn (Zea mays) herbicides when applied with flat fan and air induction nozzles. Weed Biology and Management 7(1): 55–61.
  • Buhler D., and Burnside O.C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Science 32(5): 574–583.
  • Butts T.R., Samples C.A., Franca L.X., Dodds D.M., Reynolds D.B., Adams J.W., Zollinger R.K., Howatt K.A., Fritz B.K., Clint H.W., and Kruger G.R. 2018. Spray droplet size and carrier volume effect on dicamba and glufosinate efficacy. Pest Management Science74(9): 2020–2029.
  • CombellackH., Western N.M., and Richardson R.G. 1996. A comparison of the drift potential of a novel twin fluid nozzle with conventional low volume flat fan nozzles when using a range of adjuvants. Crop Protection 15(2): 147–152.
  • Creech C.F., Henry R.S., Fritz B.K., and Kruger G.R. 2015a. Influence of herbicide active ingredient, nozzle type, orifice size, spray pressure, and carrier volume rate on spray droplet size characteristics. Weed Technology 29(2): 298–310.
  • Creech C.F., Henry R.S., Werle R., Sandell L.D., Hewitt A.J., and Kruger G.R. 2015b. Performance of post-emergent herbicides applied at different carrier volume rates. Weed Technology 29(3): 611–624.
  • Ferreira M.C., Machado-Neto J.G., and Matuo T. 1998. Reduction in the rate and spray volume in night-time application of post-emergence herbicides on soybean crop. Planta Daninha 16(1): 25–36.
  • Gauvrit C., and Lamrani T. 2008. Influence of application volume on the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl and fenoxaprop-P-ethyl on oats. Weed Research 48(1): 78–84.
  • Green J.M. 1996. Interaction of surfactant dose and spray volume on rimsulfuron activity. Weed Technology 10(3): 508–511.
  • Grichar W.J., and Dotray P.A. 2015. Influence of spray tip and spray volume on the efficacy of imazapic and imazethapyr on selected weed species. American Journal Experimental Agriculture 8(2): 75–86.
  • Guoxiong C., Tamar K., Fahima T., Zhang F., and Koral A.B. 2004. Differential patterns of germination and desiccation tolerance of mesic and xeric wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) in Israel. Journal of Arid Environments 56(1): 95–
  • Hembree K. 2012. Effects of spray coverage and nozzle selection on weed control. CWSS Conference Santa Barbara, CA January 24.
  • Hunter J.E., Gannon T.W., Richardson R.J., Yelverton F.H., and Leon R.G. 2019. Coverage and drift potential associated with nozzle and speed selection for herbicide applications using an unmanned aerial sprayer. Weed Technology 34(2): 235–
  • Jensen P.K. 2012. Increasing efficacy of graminicides with a forward angled spray. Crop Protection 32: 17–23.
  • Jensen P.K., Jorgensen L.N., and Kirknel E. 2001. Biological efficacy of herbicides and fungicides applied with low-drift and twin-fluid nozzles. Crop Protection 20(1): 57–64.
  • Knoche M. 1994. Effect of droplet size and carrier volume on performance of foliage-applied herbicides. Crop Protection 13(3): 163–178.
  • Kogan M., and Zuniga M. 2001. Dew and spray volume effect on glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technology 15(3): 590–593.
  • Lesnik M., Kramberger B., and Vajs S. 2012. The effects of drift-reducing nozzles on herbicide efficacy and maize (Zea mays) yield. Zemdirbyste 99(4): 371–378.
  • 2015. Product Catalogue. Super Turbo flat fan nozzle and Air Induction Super Turbo flat fan nozzle. http://www.magnojet.com.br/produtos
  • McMullanM. 1995. Effect of spray volume, spray pressure and adjuvant volume on efficacy of sethoxydim and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl. Crop Protection 14(7): 549–554.
  • Meyer C.J., Norsworthy J.K., Kruger G.R., and Barber T.L. 2016. Effect of nozzle selection and spray volume on droplet size and efficacy of Engenia tank-mix combinations. Weed Technology 30(2): 377–390.
  • Naser N., and Aliverdi A. 2020. Effect of nozzle type and spray volume on clodinafop-propargyl efficacy in winter wild oat (Avena sterilis ludoviciana Durieu.) control. Iranian Journal of Weed Science 16(1): 37–48. (In Persian with English abstract)
  • Nelson K.A., Renner K.A., and Penner D. 2002. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control and tuber yield with glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technology 16(2): 360–365.
  • Nordbo, Steermen J.K., and Kitknelt E. 1995. Deposition and efficiency of herbicide sprays in sugar beet with twin-fluid, low-drift and conventional hydraulic nozzles. Crop Protection 14(3): 237–240.
  • Patten K. 2002. Smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) control with imazapyr. Weed Technology 16(4): 826–832.
  • Ramsdale B.K., and Messersmith C.G. 2001. Drift-reducing nozzle effects on herbicide performance. Weed Technology 15(3): 453–460.
  • Ramsdale B.K., Messersmith C.G., and Nalewaja J.D., 2003. Spray volume, formulation, ammonium sulfate, and nozzle effects on glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technology 17(3): 589–598.
  • Ritz, Baty F., Streibig J.C., and Gerhard D. 2015. Dose-response analysis using R. PLoS One 10: e0146021.
  • Schumacher C.E., and Hatterman-Valenti H.M. 2007. Effect of dose and spray volume on early-season broadleaved weed control in Allium using herbicides. Crop Protection 26(8): 1178–1185.
  • Shaw D.R., Morris W.H., Webster E.P., and Smith D.B. 2000. Effects of spray volume and droplet size on herbicide deposition and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control. Weed Technology 14(2): 321–326.
  • Sikkema P.H., Brown L., Shropshire C., Spieser H., and Soltani N. 2008. Flat fan and air induction nozzles affect soybean herbicide efficacy. Weed Biology and Management 8(1): 31–38.
  • Skuterud R., Bjugstad N., Tyldum A., and Terresen K.S. 1998. Effect of herbicides applied at different times of the day. Crop Protection 17(1): 41–46,
  • Vallet, and Tinet C. 2013. Characteristics of droplets from single and twin jet air induction nozzles: A preliminary investigation. Crop Protection 48:63–68.
  • Zhou J., Tao B., and Messersmith C.G. 2006. Soil dust reduces glyphosate efficacy. Weed Science 54(6): 1132–1136.