مقایسه بیماری‌زایی سازه‌های عفونت‌زای ویروس ایرانی پیچیدگی برگ چغندرقند و بهینه‌سازی تکثیر و انتقال با زنجرک ناقل در شرایط گلخانه

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه گیاهپزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران

2 گروه گیاهپزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

بیماری پیچیدگی برگ چغندرقند یکی از مخرب­ترین بیماری­های ویروسی چغندرقند می­باشد. چندین گونه ویروس از جنس­های مختلف خانواده جمینی­ویریده عامل ایجاد این بیماری هستند. ویروس ایرانی پیچیدگی برگ چغندرقند (BCTIV -Beet Curly Top Iran Virus) شایع­ترین عامل این بیماری در ایران می­باشد. ژنوم BCTIV یک قطعه دی ان آ تک لای حلقوی بطول تقریبی 8/2 تا 2/3 کیلو باز است. ناقل طبیعی این ویروس زنجرک Circulifer Haematoceps است. با توجه به مشکلات تکثیر و انتقال ویروس با ناقل در گلخانه در این تحقیق بیماری زایی دو همسانه عفونت­زای ویروس با یکدیگر مقایسه شده است. همچنین شرایط لازم برای تکثیر ناقل و انتقال ویروس بهینه­سازی شده است. به این منظور همسانه‌های عفونت­زای 4/1 و 1/1 مر از BCTIV ساخته شد و به روش مایه­زنی با اگروباکتریوم به گیاهچه­های چغندرقند مایه­زنی شدند. جهت تکثیر و نگهداری جمعیت­های زنجرک ناقل آزمون­های دمایی و زمانی و میزبان ترجیحی انجام شد. سپس آزمون انتقال با ناقل طبیعی ویروس نیز انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که سازه­های ساخته شده در گیاهچه­های چغندرقند بیماریزا هستند و علائم بیماری مانند زردی و پیچیدگی از هفته چهارم پس از زمان مایه­زنی با ناقل طبیعی ایجاد شد. تولید همسانه­های عفونت­زای کارآمد مطالعه بیولوژی ویروس را تسهیل می­کند. دمای بهینه روزانه برای تکثیر زنجرک 29 و دمای بیشینه و کمینه بترتیب 34 و 18 سانتی­گراد تعیین شد و مدت زمان لازم برای تولید هر نسل 45 روز پس از استقرار زنجرک­ها بود. میزبان ترجیحی زنجرک گیاه تاج خروس وحشی (Amaranthus retroflexus) تعیین شد و جمعیت حشره بر روی این گیاه تا 1/11 برابر افزایش یافت. زنجرک­های تکثیر شده پس از تغذیه از چغندر قند آلوده، BCTIV را به گیاهان سالم انتقال دادند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of Pathogenicity of Infectious Constructs of Beet Curly Top Iran Virus and Improvement of Reproduction and Transmission by Leafhopper Vector in Greenhouse Condition

نویسندگان [English]

  • A.R. Mehrabi Nasab 1
  • M. Zakiaghl 2
  • M. Mehrvar 1
1 Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 Department of Plant Pathology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Beet curly top disease is one of the most important sugar beet viral diseases. Numbers of viruses in the family Geminiviridae, including Beet Curly Top Iran Virus (BCTIrV), Beet Curly Top Virus (BCTV), and Turnip Curly Top Virus (TCTV) have generated curly top symptoms in sugar beet. BCTIrV belongs to the genus Becurtovirus, but BCTV and TCTV put in Curtovirus and Turncurtovirus genera, respectively. BCTIrV is known as the most prevalent causal agent of curly top disease in Iran. It has circular single-stranded DNA genomes with 2.8–3.2 kb nucleotides length. The genome encapsidate in quasiicosahedral twinned particle with 22 nm diameters. BCTIrV is transmitted by Circulifer Haematoceps leafhopper naturally. Non-uniform transmission and time-consuming process of reproduction of a virus-free population of the leafhopper make experimental transmission of BCTIrV troublous. Generation of an infectious clone is another strategy for efficient inoculation of BCTIrV to host without dependency on its natural insect vector. The aim of this study is comparison of pathogenicity of two infectious clones of BCTIrV (1.1 and 1.4 mer constructs) in several hosts and optimization of criteria for efficient reproduction of the vector for transmission of the virus.
Material and Method
The complete genome of BCTIrV was cloned in pBlueScript II SK (+) previously. Plasmid extraction from the bacterial cells was carried out using plasmid extraction procedure described by Kotchoni et. al. (24). The 1.4 and 1.1 BCTIrV infectious clones were made by joining 1029 and 308 kb fragments respectively to a unit length of BCTIrV genome. The infectious clones were agroinoculated to seedling s of sugar beet. DNA extraction from newly grown leaves of agroinoculated plants was performed using CTAB. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primer pair for BCTIrV coat protein gene (CP) was carried out to identify infectivity of the constructs. To optimize the reproduction of Circulifer hematoceps in greenhouse conditions, Beta vulgaris, Solanum lycopersicum, Capsicum annuum, Nicotiana glutinosa, Sesamum indicum and Amaranthus retroflexus plants were used as hosts. To determine rate of reproduction of C. Hematoceps in greenhouse conditions, firstly optimum temperature for the leafhopper reproduction was determined, then C. Hematoceps population was counted at optimum temperature in 21, 45, and 60 days after release. In transmission test, an adult C. Hematoceps was used to transmit BCTIrV to sugar beet seedling.
Result
Sequencing data and RFLP pattern using EcoRI/XhoI restriction endonuclease were confirmed integrity of the 1.4 and 1.1 constructs. Four weeks after inoculation, BCTIrV was identified in newly grown leaves of sugar beet seedlings using PCR. Eight weeks after inoculation yellowing and leaf curling symptoms were generated on infected plants. Circulifer hematoceps was successfully reproduced on B. vulgaris, S. indicum and A. retroflexus in greenhouse. Moreover, S. lycopersicum, C. annuum, N. glutinosa were not suitable hosts for the leafhopper reproduction. The maximum, minimum, and optimum of daily temperature required for C. hematoceps reproduction was 34°C, 18°C and 29°C, respectively in a period of 45 days after the leafhopper release. Also, the best fitted host for C. hematoceps multiplication was A. retroflexus, however, BCTIrV was not infective in this plant. BCTIrV was successfully transmitted from pG-BCTIrV 1.4 and pG-BCTIrV 1.1 agroinoculated B. vulgaris plants to healthy sugar beet using C. hematoceps. Fifth weeks after the leafhopper feeding systemic symptoms of the virus were developed.
Discussion
The curly top is a destructive disease of sugar beet which is a threat to sugar beet production. Previously, several BCTIrV infectious clones with different lengths were made by other researchers. The pG-BCTIrV 1.4 is similar to constructs of previous studies. In this study, pG-BCTIrV 1.1 that is the smallest infectious construct of BCTIrV with a length of 3153 nucleotides, is successfully constructed for the first time. The 1.1 mer infectious clone will provide a facility for induction of point mutation in the BCTIrV genome to identify the role of genetic elements in virus pathogenicity via reverse genetic approach. The results indicated no significant difference in infection efficiency, symptoms severity, and vector transmission rate between pG-BCTIrV 1.4 and pG-BCTIrV 1.1 constructs. Forth weeks after inoculation symptoms were observed in B. vulgaris plants that vector transmission by pG-BCTIrV 1.4 and pG-BCTIrV 1.1, but Taheri et. al. (2012) represented symptoms appearance at two weeks post inoculation. This discrepancy may cause by differences in host susceptibility, virulence of the virus, or environmental conditions. The results revealed that, the preferential host for C. haematoceps multiplication was A. retroflexus in greenhouse conditions. The population of C. haematoceps increased up to 11.1-fold on this plant in 45 days. In the current study, infectivity of BCTIrV in A. retroflexus not identified either using agroinoculation or vector transmission, but Jahanbin et. al. (2015) represented BCTIrV infection in 20 % of agroinoculated A. retroflexus plants.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Amaranthus retroflexus
  • Beet curly top Iran virus
  • Circulifer Haematoceps
  • infectious clone
  1. Adams, M.J., King, A.M., & Carstens, E.B. (2013). Ratification vote on taxonomic proposals to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2013). Archives of Virology158(9): 2023–2030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-013-1688-5.
  2. Anabestani, A., Izadpanah, K., Tabein, S., Hamzeh-Zarghani, H., & Behjatnia, S.A.A. (2015). Beet curly top viruses in Iran: Diversity and incidence in plants and geographical regions. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 51: 493-504. (In Persian with English abstract)
  3. Baliji, S., Black, M.C., French, R., Stenger, D.C., & Sunter, G. (2004). Spinach curly top virus: A Newly Described Curtovirus Species from Southwest Texas with Incongruent Gene Phylogenies. Phytopathology94(7): 772–779.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.7.772.
  4. Bolok-Yazdi, H.R., Heydarnejad, J., & Massumi, H. (2008). Genome characterization and genetic diversity of beet curly top Iran virus: a geminivirus with a novel nonanucleotide. Virus Genes36(3): 539–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-008-0224-2.
  5. Briddon, R.W., Heydarnejad, J., Khosrowfar, F., Massumi, H., Martin, D.P., & Varsani, A. (2010). Turnip curly top virus, a highly divergent geminivirus infecting turnip in Iran. Virus Research152(2): 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2010.05.016.
  6. Briddon, R.W., Stenger, D.C., Bedford, I.D., Stanley, J., Izadpanah, K., & Markham, P.G. (1998). Comparison of a Beet curly top virus isolate originating from the old world with those from the New World. European Journal of Plant Pathology 104: 77-84.
  7. Brown, T.A. (Terence A.). (2010). Gene cloning and DNA analysis: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication 6th ed.
  8. Chasan, R. (1995). Geminiviruses: A Twin Approach to Replication. The Plant Cell7(6), 659–661.
  9. Doyle, J.J., & Doyle, J.L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
  10. Eini, O., Ebadzad Sahraei, G., & Behjatnia, S.A. (2016). Molecular characterization and construction of an infectious clone of a pepper isolate of Beet curly top Iran virusMolecular Biology Research communications5(2): 101–113.
  11. Fattahi, Z., Behjatnia, S.A.A., Afsharifar, A., Hamzehzarghani, H., & Izadpanah, K. (2012). Screening of sugar beet cultivars resistant to Iranian isolate of Beet severe curly top virus using an infectious clone of the virus. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 48: 37-38.
  12. Gutierrez, C. (2000). DNA replication and cell cycle in plants: learning from geminiviruses. The EMBO Journal 19(5): 792–799. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.5.792.
  13. Healey, A., Furtado, A., Cooper, T., & Henry, R.J. (2014). Protocol: a simple method for extracting next-generation sequencing quality genomic DNA from recalcitrant plant species. Plant Methods 10: 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-10-21.
  14. Heydarnejad, J., Hosseini, Abhari, E., Bolok-Yazdi, H.R., & Massumi, H. (2007). Curly top of cultivated plants and weeds and report of a unique Curtovirus from Iran. Journal of Phytopathology 55: 321-325.
  15. Holsters, M., de Waele, D., Depicker, A., Messens, E., van Montagu, M., & Schell, J. (1978). Transfection and transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Molecular & General Genetics 163(2): 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00267408.
  16. Hosseini Abhari, E., Heydarnejad, J., Massumi, H., Hosseini Pour, A. & Izadpanah, K. (2005). Natural hosts, vector and molecular detection of Beet curly top virus (BCTV) in Southeast of Iran. The second Asian conference on plant pathology, Singapore, p 62.
  17. Hossini, V., & Eini, O. (2017). Molecular Identification of Beet curly top Iran virus Associated with Bean in Zanjan Province. Journal of Plant Protection 30: 654-663. (In Persian)
  18. Hull, R. (2015). Matthews' Plant Virology. Elsevier/Academic press, California.
  19. Jahanbin, D., Izadpanah, K., & Behjatnia, S.A.A. (2015). Comparison of natural and experimental host range of Beet severe curly top, Beet curly top Iran and Tomato yellow leaf curl viruses. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 51: 505-521. (In Persian with English abstract)
  20. Kamali, M., Heydarnejad, J., Massumi, H., Kvarnheden, A., Kraberger, S., & Varsani, A. (2016). Molecular diversity of turncurtoviruses in Iran. Archives of Virology161(3): 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-015-2686-6.
  21. Keyvani, N. (2010). Construction of infectious clone of Beet curly top Iran virus. Master Thesis in Plant Pathology. Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection. (In Persian with English abstract)
  22. Keyvani, N., Heydarnejad, J., Massumi, H., & Razavi, S. (2011). Construction of infectious clone of Beet curly top Iran virus. 7th national biotechnology congress of I.R. Iran. (In Persian)
  23. King, A.M.Q., Adams, M.J., Carstens, E.B., & Lefkowitz, E.J. (2012). Virus taxonomy Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses: Ninth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Elsevier/Academic press, London, pp 1272. ISBN: 978-0-12-384684-6
  24. Kotchoni, S.O., Gachomo, E.W., Betiku, E., & Shonukan, O.O. (2003). A home-made kit for plasmid DNA mini-preparation. African Journal of Biotechnology 2: 86-87.
  25. Loconsole, G., Saldarelli, P., Doddapaneni, H., Savino, V., Martelli, G.P., & Saponari, M. (2012). Identification of a single-stranded DNA virus associated with citrus chlorotic dwarf disease, a new member in the family Geminiviridae. Virology432(1): 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2012.06.005.
  26. Majidi, A. (2014). Investigating the resistance of different cultivars of sugar beet to the Iranian virus, the complexity of sugar beet plant using the viral infection virus, and examining its interaction with the virus, the severe complexity of sugar beet plant in three varieties of sugar beet. Master Thesis in Plant Pathology. Shiraz University of Shiraz, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection. (In Persian with English abstract)
  27. Naqvi,A.M.H. (2004). Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables. Volume II. Springer Netherlands.
  28. Pico, B., Ferriol, M., Diez, M.J., and Vinals, F.N. (2001). Agroinoculation methods to screen wild Lycopersicon for resistance to Tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Journal of Plant Pathology 83: 215-220.
  29. Rigden, J.E., Dry, I.B., Krake, L.R., & Rezaian, M.A. (1996). Plant virus DNA replication processes in Agrobacterium: insight into the origins of geminiviruses?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America93(19): 10280–10284. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.19.10280.
  30. Soleimani, R., Matic, S., Taheri, H., Behjatnia, S.A.A., Vecchiati, M., Izadpanah, K. & Accotto, G.P. (2012). The unconventional geminivirus Beet curly top Iran virus: Satisfying Koch's postulates and determining vector and host range. Annals of Applied Biology 162: 174-181.
  31. Stanley,, Bisaro, D.M., Briddon, R.W., Brown, T.K., Fauquet, C.M., Harrison, B.D., Rybicki, E.P., & Stenger, D.C. (2005). Family geminiviridae. In the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses, 8th Report. Eds. Fauquet, C. M., Mayo, M. A., Maniloff, J., Desselberger, U., & Ball, L. A. Elsevier/Academic Press, London.
  32. Stenger, D.C., Revington, G.N., Stevenson, M.C., & Bisaro, D.M. (1991). Replicational release of geminivirus genomes from tandemly repeated copies: evidence for rolling-circle replication of a plant viral DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America88(18), 8029–8033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.18.8029.
  33. Strausbaugh, C.A., Gillen, A.M., Camp, S., Shock, C.C., Eldredge, E.P., & Gallian, J.J. (2007). Relationship of Beet Curly Top Foliar Ratings to Sugar Beet Yield. Plant Disease91(11): 1459–1463. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-11-1459.
  34. Taheri, H., Izadpanah, K. & Behjatnia S. A. A. (2012). Circulifer haematoceps, the vector of the Beet curly top Iran virus. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 48: 189. (In Persian with English abstract)
  35. Varma, A., & Malathi, V.G. (2003). Emerging geminivirus problems: a serious threat to crop production. Annals of Applied Biology 142: 145–164
  36. Varsani, A., Navas-Castillo, J., Moriones, E., Hernández-Zepeda, C., Idris, A., Brown, J.K., Murilo Zerbini, F., & Martin, D.P. (2014). Establishment of three new genera in the family Geminiviridae: Becurtovirus, Eragrovirus and Turncurtovirus. Archives of Virology159(8): 2193–2203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-014-2050-2.
  37. Whitney, E.D. & Duffus, J.E. (eds). (1986). Compendium of beet diseases and insects. American Phytopathological Society Press, St Paul, USA, p. 76.
CAPTCHA Image