گرده‌شناسی عسل تولیدی زنبور عسل (Apis mellifera L.) در استان سمنان

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی


1 گروه گیاه‌پزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران

2 مرکز آموزش عالی امام خمینی (ره)، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران


برای شناسایی منابع شهد و گرده مورد استفاده زنبور عسل در مناطق مختلف استان سمنان در سال 1396، نمونه‌های استاندارد عسل بصورت تصادفی از زنبورداری‌های 25 منطقه مختلف استان جمع‌آوری شد. دانه‌های گرده موجود در نمونه‌های عسل با دانه‌های گرده از گونه‌های گیاهی که در تشکیل عسل نقش دارند از نظر مرفولوژیکی مقایسه شدند. بر اساس تنوع مرفولوژیکی دانه‌های گرده موجود در نمونه‌های عسل تعداد 505 نوع دانه گرده متعلق به 83 خانواده گیاهی شناسایی شد. با توجه به تنوع و فراوانی دانه‌های گرده شناسایی شده در نمونه‌های عسل مطالعه شده، مهم‌ترین گونه‌های گیاهی مورد استفاده زنبور عسل در مناطق مهم زنبورداری استان به ترتیب مربوط به تیره‌های گیاهی کاسنی، بقولات، نعنائیان، رزاسه، چتریان، چلیپائیان، سوسن و آلاله بودند. در این تحقیق با استفاده از هموسایتومتر اقدام به شمارش دانه‌های گرده موجود در نمونه‌های استاندارد 10 گرمی عسل با 10 تکرار شد. از نظر تراکم تعداد دانه گرده در حجم استاندارد عسل مشخص شد که 4% از نمونه‌ها دارای کمتر از 20000 دانه گرده در نمونه استاندارد (10 گرم عسل) بوده و در کلاس 1 (بسیار ضعیف) قرار گرفتند. هیچ نمونه عسلی در کلاس 2 یا ضعیف (20000 تا 100000 دانه گرده) قرار نگرفت. 72% از نمونه‌ها در کلاس 3 یا متوسط (100000 تا 500000 دانه گرده در نمونه)، 16% نمونه‌ها در کلاس 4 یا خوب (500000 تا1000000 دانه گرده) و 8% از نمونه‌ها در کلاس 5 یا عالی (بیش از 1000000 دانه گرده) قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد که زنبور عسل معمولی در شرایط منطقه مورد مطالعه در رفتار چراگری وابستگی به گیاه خاصی ندارد. آنالیز دانه‌های گرده عسل نشان داد به استثنای چند مورد خاص، منابع مورد چرای زنبور‌های عسل کارگر در شرایط منطقه بسته به فصل و شرایط، طیف متنوعی از گیاهان گلدار را در بر می‌گیرد.



عنوان مقاله [English]

Palynological Analysis of Honey Produced by Apis mellifera L. in Semnan-Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • M. Niknam 1
  • H. Sadeghi-Namaghi 1
  • H. Nazarian 2
1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
2 Imam Khomeini Higher Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Increasing beekeeping activities, it is important to identify the main sources of pollen in a region and their value for bee colonies and pollen production. The latter may have a significant impact on the morphology, behavior, and physiology of all individuals and on the quality of pollination services as well. Therefore, pollen has a great impact on colony health. Several researches have shown that pollen quality varies in terms of the type and quality of amino acids and the amount of total protein, depending on the origin of the flower. For this reason, the palynological diversity of pollen is a good measure of the quality of bees' lives. Pollen and nectar of plants used by bees in some regions of Iran have been investigated in the literature However, there are no data about the status of bee pollen sources in Semnan province. The present work aims to consider changes in the plant composition and pollen concentrations of honey samples during the investigation period. Especially, to determine honey bee forager’s pollen preferences in the study area, and to prepare a guide of a year round floral calendar for beekeepers and farmers for better understanding the blooming periods of bee pollinated plants.
Material and Methods: This research was conducted in 2017 in different regions of Semnan province. Semnan province with an area of 97491 square kilometers occupies 5.8 percent of the country's area. This province located between 34º, 13´ to 37 º, 20´ N latitude and from 51 º, 51´to 57 º, 3´ E longitude. In this study, for quantitative analysis of pollen grains, the amount of one kilogram of honey was prepared from 25 beekeepers in Semnan province at the end of summer and the geographical coordinates of the hive locations were recorded using a GPS device. All samples were analysed using the standard pollen analysis a hemocytometer was used to count the number of pollens in a certain volume of solution. Pollen grains were counted using a light microscope with a magnification of 100. These steps were repeated ten times for each sample of honey. To identify pollen grains, one drop of the well-homogenised pollen grain suspension was applied to a microscope slide, covered with a 22 mm × 22 mm cover glass and sealed with nail varnish. For each sample, several microscopic slides were prepared and were observed using light and polarised light microscopy. Pollen grains were identified to species level where possible by comparison to the reference pollen collection prepared from hand-collected pollens from known flowering plants in the study area. The frequency of occurrence was calculated as the percentage of samples, in which one pollen type was observed. Honey samples were classified using the method of Liux et al. (16).
Results and Discussion: In this research, 505 types of pollen grains were identified in honey samples collected from the study areas, which belonged to 83 plant families. Among these grains, pollen grains of 474 plant species were identified in honey of Abrsaj, Abar, Shahkooh paeen, Bastam, Dibaj Damghan and Rameh Garmsar regions and 31 species of honey from other regions of the province and from the honey supplied by beekeepers migrated to Semnan province. Based on the comparison of the means between the number of pollen grains in standard samples, the highest number of pollen grains was recorded in Qatari and Folad mahalle regions (respectively with an average of 1174 000 and 169000).The lowest number of pollen grains was observed in Comercial sample and Abrsaj2 (with the mean of 17000 and 140000, respectively) (Figure 3). The results of comparing the means as well as the classification table of pollen grains showed that 72% of the studied areas (18 areas) placed in class 3 (100000 to 500000 grains in the standard sample), 16% (4 regions) in class 4 (500000 to 1000000 pollen grains), 8% (2 regions) in class 5 (above 1000000) and 4% (1 region) in class 1 (less than 20000), in terms of the number of pollen grains per 10 grams of honey. In this study, no sample was included in class 2. The results of identifying pollen grains and their abundance in honey samples showed that the most important plant species used by foraging bees were related to Asteraceae, Leguminosae, Lamiaceae, rosaceae, Apiaceae, and Brassicaceae, Liliaceae and Ranunculaceae families, respectively. The results also showed that the range and diversity of plants in the composition of the honey spectrum of each region are of particular importance. The higher density of a plant species and the wider level of its distribution, the more dramatic use of bees. These results help to prove the complexity and heterogeneity of environmental and ecological phenomena in feeding and grazing bees’ process.
Conclusion: The present study complements previous melissopalynological studies from other provinces of Iran and provides additional and new information on regional plant resources for pollen in honey. In this study all honey samples were obtained directly from local beekeepers and the melissopalynological analysis was completed with direct observations of the search behavior of worker bees. Therefore, we were able to determine the origin of the pollen in the honey using the location of the hive, the season and the available flower source. However, more studies are needed to fully understand the preferential behavior of grazing bees and the pollen of honey produced in the area.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bees
  • honey
  • melissopalynology
  • pollen grains
1. Alaux C., Ducloz F., Crauser D., and Le Conte Y. 2010. Diet effects on honey bee immunocompetence. Biology Letters 6(4): 562–565.
2. Brodschneider R., and Crailsheim K. 2010. Nutrition and health in honey bees. Apidologie 41: 278-294. DOI:10.1051/apido/2010012.
3. Carter R., and Dill L. 1990. Why are bumble bees risk-sensitive foragers?  Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26: 121–127.
4. Çelemli Ö.G., Özenirler Ç., Bayram N.E., Zare G., and Sorkun K. 2018. Melissopalynological analysis for geographical marking of Kars honey. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner.  Fakultesi Dergisi Journal 24(1): 53-59.
5. Corbet S.A., Williams I.H. and Osborne J.L. 1991. Bees and the Pollination of Crops and Wild Flowers in the European Community. Bee World 72(2): 47-59.
6. Dinkov D. 2015. Quantitative melissopalynological analysis of bee honey using a Bürker chamber. International Food Research Journal 22(4): 1538-1543.
7. Eckhardt M., Haider M., Dorn S., and Müller A. 2014. Pollen mixing in pollen generalist solitary bees: a possible strategy to complement or mitigate unfavourable pollen properties? Journal of Animal Ecology 83: 588–597. DOI:10.1111/1365-2656.12168.
8. Erdtman G. 1960. The acetolysis method: A revised description. Svensk BotaniskTidskrift 54: 556-564.
9. Harder L.D., and Real L.A. 1987. Why are bumble bees risk averse? Ecology 68(4):1104-1108.
10. Hassanien M.M., El-Sherif M.E.M., Salem A.A.A., and Ali M.A.M. 2018. Quantitative pollen analysis of bee honey at certain apiaries in qalyubia governorate and available honey in local market. Egypt Arab University, Ain Shams University, Cairo Journal of Agricultural Science 26(1): 303-311.
11. Human H., Brodschneider R., Dietemann V., Dively G., Ellis J., Forsgren E., Fries I., Hatjina F., Hu F-L., Jaffè R., Jensen A. B., Köhler A., Magyar J., Özkýrým A., Pirk C.W. W., Rose R., Strauss U., Tanner G., Tarpy D.R., van der Steen J.J.M., Vaudo A., Vejsnaes F., Wilde J., Williams G. R. and Zheng H-Q. 2013. Miscellaneous standard methods for Apis mellifera research. Journal of Apicultural Research 52(4): 1-53.
12. Jones G.D, and Bryant V.M. 1996. Melissopalynology. P. 933–938. In: J. Jansonius, and McGregor D.C., (eds.) Palynology, principles and applications. Salt Lake City, UT: AASP Foundation.
13. Keller I., Peter F., and Imdorf A. 2005. Pollen nutrition and colony development in honey bees: part I Bee World 86: 3–10.
14. Kerkvliet J.D., Shrestha M., Tuladhar K. and Manandhar H. 1995. Microscopic detection of adulteration of honey with cane sugar and cane sugar products. Apidologie 26: 131–139.
15. Kaškonienė V., Venskutonis R., and Čeksteryte V. 2010. Carbohydrate composition and electrical conductivity of different origin honeys from Lithuania. Food Science and Technology 43(5):801-807.
16. Louveaux J., Maurizio A., and Vorwohl G. 1978. Methods of Melissopalynology. Bee World 59:139–157.
17. Memariani F. 1997. Pollen study of some honey samples in Khorasan province. Journal of Research and Construction 49: 79-83.
18. Manafi H. 1991. Polynological study of Azerbaijani honeys in samples prepared from Khoy, Osko and Kalibar regions. Journal of Research and Construction 22(B 73): 180-182.
19. Özler H .2015. Melissopalynological analysis of honey samples belonging to different districts of Sinop, Turkey. Mellifera 15(1): 1-11.‏
20. Persano O.L., and Piro R. 2004. Main European unifloral honeys: descriptive sheets. Apidologie 35(1): S38–S81.
21. Piana M.L., Persano O. L., Bentabol A., Bruneau E., Bogdanov S., and Declerck Ch. G. 2004. Sensory analysis applied to honey: state of the art. Apidologie 35: S26–S37.
22. Ponnuchamy R., Bonhomme V., Prasad S., Das L., Patel P.,  Gaucherel C. D., Pragasam  A., and Anupama K. 2015. Honey Pollen: Using melissopalynology to understand foraging preferences of bees in tropical south India. PlOS One9(7): 1-12.
23. Pirani J.R., and Cortopassi-Laurino M. 1993. Flowers and bees of São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 192 pp.
24. Razzaghi kaamroudi M., Saneie Shariat Panahi M., Nazarian H., and Ghalichnia, H. 2001. Identification of pollens in honey of Nour region in Mazandaran. Journal of Research and Construction 72: 74-83.
25. Russmann, H. 1998. Yeasts and glycerin in flower honey Evidence of fermentation or stopped. Lebensmittelchemie 52: 116–117. (In German)
26. Sabugosa-Madeira B., Ribeiro H., Cunha M., and Abreu I. 2008. Anemophilous and entomophilous pollen flowers of Castanea sativa in the Northeast of Portugal. Acta Horticulturae 784: 133–136.
27. Saneie Shariat Panahi M., and Saeed Abadi H. 1999. Honey-producing plants in Karaj region by palinologicaal method. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, No. 2 and 3:18-24. (In Persian with English abstract)
28. Scofield H. N. and Mattila H.R. 2015. Honey bee workers that are pollen stressed as larvae become poor foragers and waggle dancers as adults. PLOS One 10(4): 1-19.  DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0121731.
29. Song X-Y., Yao Y-F., and Yang W-D. 2012. Pollen analysis of natural honeys from the central region of Shanxi, north China. PLoS One 7(11): e49545 1-11.
30. StephensD.W., andKrebs J.R.1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton university press, Princeton. 247 pp.
32. Vergeron P. 1964. Statistical interpretation of the results of pollen analysis of honey. A Les Annales de l’Abeille 7(4): 349-364. (In French)
32. Von der Ohe W., Oddo L., Piana M., Morlot M., and Martin P. 2004. Harmonized methods of melissopalynology. Springer Verlag. Apidologie 35 (Suppl. 1): S18-S25.