Journal of Iranian Plant Protection Research

Journal of Iranian Plant Protection Research

Investigation of the Response of Crown Vetch (Coronilla varia) Ecotypes to Various Post-Emergence Herbicides under Greenhouse Conditions, with the Aim of Assessing the Feasibility of Cultivating It

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2 Department of Horticultural Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
Abstract
Introduction
Crown vetch (Coronilla varia) is a perennial tetraploid leguminous plant (2n=24) belonging to the Fabaceae family. Widely used as a decorative ground cover and in erosion control along roadsides, it also plays a vital role in nitrogen fixation, environmental improvement, and soil microclimate enhancement. Native to Central and Southern Europe, its cultivation has expanded to the Mediterranean, Russia, Middle East, and the United States. In Iran, it is found in various provinces such as Mazandaran, Ilam, Lorestan, Guilan, Qom, Kermanshah, Golestan, Kurdistan, and Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, primarily in pastures, orchards, and field margins. Although primarily valued as forage with nutritional quality comparable to alfalfa, Crown vetch contains toxic compounds like cyanogenic glycosides, notably "croneoline", which pose risks to non-ruminant animals, especially horses. The herbicide 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is used post-emergently for controlling broadleaf weeds in various crops, particularly in no-till systems. Common broadleaf herbicides used in alfalfa fields in Iran include chlorotoluron, paraquat, glyphosate, imazethapyr, topramezone, and bentazone, along with grass herbicides such as fluazifop-p-butyl and haloxyfop-methyl. Atlantis is a herbicide containing methylsulfuron-methyl and iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium from the sulfonylurea active ingredient group; it is widely used for controlling broadleaf weeds as well as some annual weeds in wheat fields. The use of Crown vetch as a cultivated crop in Iran remains limited, and its potential as a weed or a cover crop warrants further investigation.
 
Materials and Methods
To evaluate the effects of herbicides on different ecotypes of Medicago sativa subsp. falcata, a factorial experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with four replications in the greenhouse of the University of Kurdistan in 2024. The experimental factors included ten ecotypes (collected from the provinces of  Hamadan, Kermanshah, Kurdistan, Ilam, and Semnan) and five herbicide treatments (control without herbicide, Totril, 2,4-DB, Granstar, and Atlantis). Seeds were germinated using the top-paper method, and uniform seedlings were transplanted into pots under controlled greenhouse conditions. At the four-leaf stage, plant density was thinned to two plants per pot, and herbicides were applied at the recommended wheat dosages during the branching stage. Spraying was carried out at 22 ± 2 °C, 60–65% relative humidity, and a spray volume of 300 L.ha⁻¹. After 21 days, visual injury ratings were recorded, and shoot dry weight was measured after oven-drying samples at 72 °C for 48 h. Plant height and leaf area index (LAI) were also recorded. Changes in LAI were measured using an LAI meter and analyzed by fitting a logistic growth model. Data were subjected to ANOVA using SAS (version 9.4), mean comparisons were performed by LSD test at the 1% level, and data normality was checked using Minitab. Graphs were prepared using Microsoft Excel.
 
Results and Discussion
In the evaluation of leaf area index, the highest value was observed in the control treatment of the Paveh ecotype (1.45), while the lowest value was recorded in the 2,4-DB treatment of the Marivan ecotype (0.24). Overall, the average reduction in leaf area index compared with the control treatment for the herbicides 2,4-DB, Totril, Granstar, and Atlantis was 58.03%, 48%, 41.4%, and 21.03%, respectively. Visual assessment results indicated that the herbicides 2,4-DB (99%) and Totril (95.5%) had the greatest effect on controlling the Medicago sativa ecotypes, whereas Atlantis (53.7%) showed the lowest control efficiency. The highest percentage reduction in plant height compared to the control treatment was observed as follows: 2,4-DB (68.52% in the Hamedan ecotype), Totril (58.68% in the Saqez ecotype), Granstar (38.71% in the Nahavand ecotype), and Atlantis (26.02% in the Hamedan ecotype). In the evaluation of leaf area index (LAI), the highest value was recorded in the control treatment of the Paveh ecotype (1.45), and the lowest value in the 2,4-DB treatment of the Marivan ecotype (0.24). Overall, the average reduction in LAI compared with the control for 2,4-DB, Totril, Granstar, and Atlantis was 58.03%, 48%, 41.4%, and 21.03%, respectively. Regarding shoot dry weight, the highest value was observed in the control treatment of the Paveh ecotype (28.67 g), and the lowest in the 2,4-DB treatment of the Saqez ecotype (5.11 g). In general, Totril and 2,4-DB caused the greatest reduction in shoot dry weight of Medicago sativa, whereas Atlantis had the least reduction compared to the other herbicides.
 
Conclusion
The study demonstrated that Totril and 2,4-DB herbicides were the most effective in controlling Medicago sativa as a weed, while Granstar and Atlantis showed lower efficacy. Considering the potential phytotoxicity of 2,4-DB in orchards, Totril is recommended as a safer option for weed management in such environments. Furthermore, the Paveh and Semnan ecotypes, with higher shoot dry weight and leaf area index, were identified as herbicide-resistant and high-performing, making them suitable for cultivation purposes. Pre-emergence application of effective herbicides like Totril is advised to control weeds without reducing crop performance.
Keywords
Subjects

در نسخه منتشرشدهٔ قبلی این مقاله، وابستگی نویسنده به‌ اشتباه به صورت «Mohaghegh Ardabili University» درج شده بود. وابستگی صحیح نویسنده «University of Mohaghegh Ardabili» می‌باشد. این اصلاح هیچ تاثیری بر محتوای علمی، نتایج یا نتیجه‌گیری‌های مقاله ندارد. از هرگونه سوءتفاهم احتمالی پوزش می‌طلبیم.

  1. Abbasi, R., & Alizadeh, H. (2012). Control of redroot pigweed in greenhouse with oxyflourfen and determining the rate and time of this herbicide in controlling soybean weeds. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Science, 43(1), 1–9. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2012.24873
  2. Adkins, E. K. (1977). Effects of diverse androgens on the sexual behavior and morphology of castrated male quail. Hormones and Behavior, 8(2), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(77)90037-X
  3. Adeli, T., Tahmasebi, I., & Babaei, S. (2024). Response of waxy leaved mustard weed (Boreava orientalis and Spach.) to different herbicides in greenhouse conditions. Iranian Journal of Weed Science, 19(2), 1–12. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22034/ijws.2023.361442.1432
  4. Al-Hashemi, A. T. H. S., & Al-Obaidi, M. A. A. (2024). Comparison of the effect of four types of chemical herbicides on the growth characteristics and yield of wheat and the weeds that grow with it. 5th International Conference of Modern Technologies in Agricultural Sciences, In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1371, 5, 052086. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1371/5/052086
  5. Al-Snafi, A. E. (2016). The pharmacological and toxicological effects of Coronilla varia and Coronilla scorpioides: A review. The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal, 3(2), 105–114.
  6. Arregui, M., Sanchez, D. O., & Scotta, R. R. (2001). Weed control in established alfalfa (Medicago sativa) with postemergence herbicides. Agricultural and Food Sciences, 15(3), 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0424:WCIEAM]2.0.CO;2
  7. Campbel, D. C., & Kondra, Z. P. (1978). Relationships among growth patterns, yield components, and yield of rapeseed. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps78-016
  8. Donald, W. W. (2002). Estimating relative crop yield loss resulting from herbicide damage using crop ground cover or rated stunting, with maize and sethoxydim as a case study. Weed Research, 38(6), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.1998.00110.x
  9. El-Kholy, R. M. A., & El-Tawil, M. F. (2019). Efficacy of certain tribenuron-methyl formulations for the control of broad-leaved weeds in wheat under field conditions. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 10(6), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.21608/jppp.2019.48296
  10. Faji, M., Kebede, G., Feyissa, F., Mohammed, K., Mengistu, G., & Terefe, G. (2022). Doses and timing of 2,4-D application for broadleaf weed control, botanical compositions, productivity, and nutritive value of natural pasture. Advances in Agriculture, 2022, Article ID 6913488. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6913488
  11. Gazola, T., Costa, R. N., Carbonari, C. A., & Velini, E. D. (2022). Dynamics of 2,4-D and dicamba applied to corn straw and their residual action in weeds. Plants, 11(20), 2800. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11202800
  12. Gomurgen, A. N., Furtana, G. B., & Tipirdamaz, R. (2023). Cytophysiological impacts of tribenuron-methyl herbicide on Allium cepa. Biyoloji Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 16(2), 51–60.
  13. Grossmann, K. (2010). Auxin herbicides: Current status of mechanism and mode of action. Pest Management Science, 66(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1860
  14. Gustine, D. L., & Moyer, B. G. (1990). Crownvetch (Coronilla varia). p. 341–354. In Y.P.S. Bajaj (Ed). Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry10. Legumes and Oilseed Crops I. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg.682P. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74448-8_15
  15. Hamill, A. S., Marriage, P. B., & Friesen, G. (1977). A method for assessing herbicide performance in small plot experiments. Weed Science, 25(5), 386–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500033713
  16. Hawf, L. R., & Behrens, R. (1974). Selectivity factors in the response of plants to 2,4-DB. Weed Science, 22(3), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500036997
  17. Hussain, M. A., Khether, A. A., & Mohammed, M. O. (2018). Influence of combine application of topic, granstar herbicides and phosphor levels on weeds and bread wheat yield and its components. Journal of Duhok University, 21(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.26682/avuod.2019.21.1.6
  18. Khozimy, A. M., Hamada, S. H., & Abuzeid, M. A. S. (2023). Efficacy of tribenuron–methyl, fluroxypyr and their combinations in controlling broad-leaved weeds in wheat. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal, 44(4), 739–749. https://doi.org/10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2023.331365
  19. Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degnil, J., & Tette, J. (1992). A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. IPM Program, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station.
  20. Kaur, A., & Kaur, N. (2019). Effect of sub-lethal doses of 2,4-D sodium salt on physiology and seed production potential of wheat and associated dicotyledonous weeds. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 51(4), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2019.00074.1
  21. Mamnooei, A., & Atari, A. (2020). Efficacy comparison of pendimethalin herbicide with some registered herbicides in the weed control of onion in south Kerman. Journal of Crop Improvement, 22(2), 307–317. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2019.283455.2233
  22. Mesbahi, S. M., Ghasemi Ghahsareh, M., & Esmaeili, S. (2023). Chemical control of dandelion (Taraxacum) weed in kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.). Plant Productions, 46(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2023.41710.2055
  23. Mighani, F., Mirvakili, S. M., Jahedi, A., Baghestani, M. A., & Shimi, P. (2010). Evaluation of 2,4-DB herbicide (Butress) efficacy for weed control in established alfalfa. Iranian Weed Science Journal, 6(2), 67–77. (In Persian with English abstract)
  24. Minbashi Moeini, M., Hadizadeh, M., Karaminejad, M., Sabet Zangeneh, H., Jamali, M., Haghighi, A. (2022). Efficacy of fluroxypyr compared with common broadleaf herbicides in the wheat fields. Iranian Plant Protection Research, 36(3), 367-384. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jpp.2022.74981.1074
  25. Moghaddam, N., Monsefi, A., & Aynebend, A. (2023). Investigation of the effect of combined application of pre- and post-emergence herbicides on wheat yield and yield components. Journal of Plant Production Research, 30(3), 123–140. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22069/jopp.2023.20748.2978
  26. Molano-Flores, B. (2014). An invasive plant species decreases native plant reproductive success. Natural Areas Journal, 34(4), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.034.0410
  27. Nath, C. P., Singh, R. G., Choudhary, V. K., Datta, D., Nandan, R., & Singh, S. S. (2024). Challenges and alternatives of herbicide-based weed management. Agronomy, 14(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010126
  28. Norouzi, M., Dadashi, M. R., Mighani, F., & Ajam Norouzi, H. (2023). Effectiveness of various herbicides on weed control, growth indices, and forage yield of alfalfa. Journal of Plant Environmental Physiology, 69(1), 99–114. (In Persian with English abstract).
  29. Polkhani, R., Kazemeini, S., Edalat, M. (2023). Evaluation of foramsulfuron + idosulfuron (MaisTer OD) herbicide efficacy on weed control, growth and yield of maize. Iranian Plant Protection Research, 36(4), 467-479. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jpp.2022.75776.1083
  30. Rouzkhush, M., Rastgoo, M., Hajmohammadniaqalybaf, K., Tahmasebi, B. Kh., & Aein, A. (2024). The effect of different herbicides on the control of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) in onion (Alium cepa L.). Iranian Journal of Weed Science, 19(2), 141–158. (In Persian with English abstract).
  31. Said, I. A., & Jaff, D. M. A. (2020). Evaluation of Chevalier WG and Atlantis OD herbicides to control weeds in winter wheat fields. The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Science, 51, 96–100. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v51iSpecial.886
  32. Salehi Shanjani, P., Rasoulzadeh, L., & Javadi, H. (2023). Evaluation of morphological traits in the populations of Coronilla varia Journal of Rangeland Science, 13(1), 52–71.
  33. Sarmadnia, G. H., & Kochaki, A. (2013). Physiology of Field Crops (2nd ed.). Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian with English abstract).
  34. Sharif, Y. O. N. A., Al-Mafrajy, A. S. H., & Albarzenje, Z. M. M. (2024). Evaluation of the effectiveness of 2.4-D 72% herbicide in combating weedy leaves associated with different varieties of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and its effect on growth characteristics. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1371(5), 052020. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1371/5/052020
  35. Sharma, N., Pandey, B. K., & Tiwari, A. (2024). Growth and yield parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum) as affected by different herbicides on different weeds in the field. International Journal of Research in Agronomy, 7(2), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2024.v7.i2a.275
  36. Sowinski, J. (2014). The effect of companion crops management on biological weed control in the seeding year of lucerne. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 30(2), 107–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2013.864571
  37. Tahmasebi, B. K., Zand, E., Yousefi, A., Babaei, S., & Sadeghpour, A. (2024). Surveillance and mapping of tribenuron-methyl-resistant weeds in wheat fields. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 28626. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75308-1
  38. Vivanco, P., Oliveira, J. A., & Martín, I. (2021). Optimal germination conditions for monitoring seed viability in wild populations of fescues. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 19(3), e0703. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2021193-18025
  39. Wu, C., Wang, Q., Xie, B., Wang, Z., Cui, J., & Hu, T. (2011). Effects of drought and salt stress on seed germination of three leguminous species. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(78), 17954–17961. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2018
  40. Yusuf, R. I., Siemens, J. C., & Bullock, D. G. (1999). Growth analysis of soybean under no-tillage and conventional tillage systems. Agronomy Journal, 91, 928–933. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1999.916928x
  41. Zand, E., Baghestani, M. A., Nezam Abadi, N., Shimi, P., & Mousavi, S. K. (2019). Chemical Weed Control Guide in Iran (6th ed.). Jihad Daneshgahi Press, Mashhad (In Persian with English abstract).
  42. Zimdahl, R. L. (2012). Weed Science: A Plea for Thought—Revisited. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7935-4
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.