Reaction of Soybean Genotypes Containing Alleles of Rsv1-Resistance Gene Inoculated with Three Strain of Soybean Mosaic Virus

Document Type : Research Article


1 Ph.D. Student of Plant Pathology , Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

3 Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad

4 Associate Professor, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, Knoxville


Introduction: Among legumes, soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is an important plant that grown throughout the world. There are many pathogens that reduce soybean yield. Plant viral diseases cause serious economic losses in many major crops by reducing yield and quality. Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is amongst important pathogens that infect soybean. Plants use resistance genes against the invasive pathogens. The identification mechanism is based on gene-for-gene hypothesis. Plant resistance (R) genes direct recognition of pathogens harboring matching avirulent genes (signals) leading to activation of host defense responses. It has long been hypothesized that under selection pressure the infidelity of RNA virus replication together with large population size and short generation times results in emergence of variants (mutants) capable of evading R-mediated recognition. Four R gene including Rsv1, Rsv3, Rsv4 and newly Rsv5 have found in soybean operating against SMV.
Materials and Methods: In this study, Rsv1/Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) pathosystem was used to investigate this hypothesis. Infectious cDNA clones of SMV-N (pSMV-N) and SMV-G7 (pSMV-G7) inoculated biolistically on Essex (rsv1) and SMV-G7d (pSMV-G7d) on Williams82 (rsv1) served as the sources of parental viruses. Sap containing viral progenies in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, derived from the infected tissues of biolistically inoculated Essex (rsv1) and Williams82 (rsv1) served as inoculum to mechanically inoculate carborundum-dusted primary leaves of other soybean genotypes. Soybean genotypes containing alleles of Rsv1 were inoculated with SMV strains N, G7 and G7d. Soybean genotype Williams82 (rsv1), susceptible to all strains of SMV and Rsv1-genotype soybean PI96983, Kwanggyo (Rsv1-k), Marshal (Rsv1-m), Ogden (Rsv1-t), Raiden (Rsv1-r), Suweon97 (Rsv1-sk) and Touson50 (Rsv1-n) were used in this study. All soybean seed were obtained from field-grown plants shown to be free of SMV by indexing. The inoculated plants were maintained in a growth chamber operating at 22°C with a photoperiod of 16h light and 8h dark. After twenty one days of post-inoculation, plants were examined by indirect ELISA and RT-PCR. Nested PCR was done and after Sanger sequencing of PCR products, results were analyzed by using Finch TV and MEGA7 software. Total RNA was isolated from top fully-developed systemically infected trifoliate leaves using an RNeasy Plant mini kit (Qiagen) as instructed by the manufacturer. RT-PCR was done in the presence of Superscript reverse-transcriptase III (Invitrogen) as instructed by the manufacturer. Nested PCR amplification of the entire HC-pro and P3 cistrons was done using two pairs of primers, SMV-239s / SMV-3910a and SMV-482s / SMV-3840a, in the presence of EX Taq polymerase (Takara Bio). The resultant amplicons were purified with a QIAquick-PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) or MinElute® PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced using primers SMV-1468s, SMV-1614a, SMV-2289s and SMV-2916s. Sequencing was done at The University of Tennessee DNA Sequencing Facility.
Results and Discussion: One out of ten York and Kwanggyo plants and two out of thirty Ogden plants inoculated with viral progeny derived from the reproduction of soybean mosaic virus strain N complementary DNA (c-DNA) molecule on susceptible soybean plants, which was cloned in the laboratory (molecularly cloned SMV-N or pSMV-N) showed viral symptoms and were positive in indirect ELISA. In mechanical inoculation using the sap from these plants, the virus was again transferred to York, Kwanggyo and Ogden plants and subsequently was adapted to these plants. After performing RT-PCR test and determining the full-length sequence of the HC-Pro (Helper Component-Protease) and P3 cistrons of the virus, the position of the point mutation and the amino acid encoded by the nucleotide exchange at the mutation point, using MEGA7 software, was identified. In York and Kwanggyo plants, a point mutation was observed in the HC-Pro whereas in the Ogden plant in the P3 cistron.
Conclusion: The evolution of viruses is unavoidably linked to the evolution of their hosts. Due to the mutations in virus genome and the breakdown of resistance of various soybean genotypes, as well as the fact that the genome of the soybean mosaic virus is RNA type and the possibility of mutation is high, it can be a warning sign for plant breeders producing soybean plants with resistance genes to different strains of the virus. RNA viruses apply all known mechanisms of genetic variation to ensure their survival. Also, the intersection of resistant and susceptible genotypes and the study of the allele of resistance genes can be effective in producing resistant genotypes. The identities of different Rsv genes need to be revealed and the key components in SMV resistant signaling pathway need to be identified. So, a good breeding-for-resistance strategy would aim to develop cultivars with resistance against a wide range of strains of SMV. Transgenic soybean lines expressing part of the P3 and HC-Pro genes have been showed a stable and enhanced resistance to several strains of SMV and have the potential to significantly increase soybean yield.


Main Subjects

  • Ahangaran A., Mosahebi Mohammadi G.H., Koohi Habibi M., Khezri S., and Shahraeen N. 2009. Use of rapid serological and nucleic acid-based methods for detecting the Soybean mosaic virus. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 11: 91-97.
  • Ahangaran A., Koohi Habibi M., Mosahebi Mohammadi G.H., Winter S., and Garcia-Arenal F. 2013. Analysis of Soybean mosaic virus genetic diversity in Iran allows the characterization of a new mutation resulting in overcoming Rsv4-resistance. Journal of General Virology 94: 2557-
  • Bachkar C.B., Balgude Y.S., Shinde P.B., and Deokar C.D. 2019. Screening of soybean genotypes against soybean mosaic virus under natural and glass house conditions. International Journal of Chemical Studies 7(1): 2267-2269.
  • Chen P., Buss G.R., Roane C.W., and Tolin S.A. 1991. Allelism among genes for resistance to soybean mosaic virus in strain-differential soybean cultivars. Crop Science 31: 305-309.
  • Chen P., Ma G., Buss G.R., Gunduz I., Roane C.W., and Tolin S.A. 2001. Inheritance and allelism of Raiden soybean for resistance to soybean mosaic virus. Journal of Heredity 92: 51-55.
  • Chen P., Buss G.R., Tolin S.A., Gunduz I., and Cicek M. 2002. A valuable gene in Suweon 97 soybean for resistance to soybean mosaic virus. Crop Science 42: 333-337.
  • Eggenberger A.L., Hajimorad M.R., and Hill J.H. 2008. Gain of virulence on Rsv1-genotype soybean by an avirulent Soybean mosaic virus requires concurrent mutations in both P3 and HC-Pro. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interaction 21: 931-936.
  • Golnaraghi A.R., Shahraeen N., Pourrahim R., Farzadfar SH., and Ghasemi A. 2004. Occurrence and relative incidence of viruses infecting soybeans in Iran. Plant Disease 88: 1069-1074. 
  • Hajimorad M.R., Eggenberger A.L., and Hill J.H. 2003. Evolution of Soybean mosaic virus-G7 molecularly cloned genome in Rsv1-genotype soybean results in emergence of a mutant capable of evading Rsv1-mediated recognition. Virology 314: 497-509.
  • Hajimorad M.R., Eggenberger A.L., and Hill J.H. 2008. Adaptation of Soybean mosaic virusAvirulent Chimeras Containing P3 Sequences from Virulent Strain to Rsv1-Genotype Soybeans Is Mediated by Mutations in HC-Pro. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 21: 7937-946.
  • Hajimorad M.R., Wen R.H., Eggenberger A.L., Hill J.H., and Saghai Maroof M. A. 2011. Experimental adaptation of an RNA virus mimics natural evolution. Journal of General Virology 85: 2557-2564.
  • Hajimorad M.R., Domier L.L., Tolin S.A., Whitham S.A., and Saghai Maroof M.A. 2018. Soybean mosaic virus: A successful potyvirus with a wide distribution but restricted natural host range. Molecular Plant Pathology 19: 1563-1579.
  • Hamzeh N., Mosahebi Mohammadi G. H., Koohi Habibi M., and Mohammadi M. 2006. Identification and detection of Soybean mosaic virus in Mazandaran and Golestan provinces. Iranian Magazine of Agriculture Sciences 37(4): 637-643.
  • Hayes A.J., Jeong S.C., Gore M.A., Yu Y.G., Buss G.R., Tolin S.A., and Saghai Maroof M.A. 2004. Recombination within a nucleotide-binding-site/leucine-rich repeat gene cluster produces new variants conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus in soybeans. Genetics 166: 493-503.
  • Jian-Zhong L., Yuan F., and Hongxi P. 2016. The current status of the soybean- Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) pathosystem. Frontiers Microbiology 7: article 1906.
  • Jonathan DG J. 1996. Plant disease resistance genes: structure, function and evolution. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 7: 155-160.
  • Khatabi B., Fajolu O.L., Wen R.-H., and Hajimorad M.R. 2012. Evaluation of North American isolates of Soybean mosaic virus for gain of virulence on Rsv-genotype soybeans with special emphasis on resistance-breaking determinants on Rsv4. Molecular Plant Pathology 13: 1077-1088.
  • Kiihl R.A.S., and Hartwig E.E. 1979. Inheritance of reaction to Soybean mosaic virus in soybeans. Crop Science 19: 372-375.
  • Lommel S.A., McCain A. H., and Morris T. J. 1982. Evolution of indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. Phytopathology 72: 1018-1022.
  • Ma G., Chen P., Buss G.R., and Tolin S.A. 1995. Genetic characteristics of two genes for resistance to soybean mosaic virus in PI486355 soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 907-914.
  • Ma G., Chen P., Buss G.R., and Tolin S.A. 2003. Genetic study of a lethal necrosis to Soybean mosaic virus in PI 507389 soybean. Journal of Heredity 94(3): 205-211.
  • Naghavi A., koohi Habibi M., and Firouzabadi F.N. 2008. Detection and identification of some soybean viral mosaic viruses, using molecular techniques in Lorestan province, south west of Iran. Asian Journal of Plant Science 7(6): 557-562.
  • Stacey G., and Jorgensen R. A. 2008. Genetics and Genomics of Soybean. Springer Science + Business Media, Vol. 2.
  • Saghai Maroof M.A., Tucker D.M., and Tolin S.A. 2008. Genomics of Viral-Soybean Interactions. Genetics and Genomics of Soybean, Springer Science + Business Media 293-319.
  • Takahashi H., Miller J., Nozaki Y., Takeda M., Shah J., Hase S., Ikegami M., Ehara Y., and Dinesh-Kumar S.P. 2002. RCY1, an Arabidopsis thaliana RPP8/HRT family resistance gene, conferring resistance to cucumber mosaic virus requires salicylic acid, ethylene and a novel signal transduction mechanism. The Plant Journal 32: 655-667.
  • Wang L., Eggenberger A.L., Hill J., and Bogdanove A.J. 2006. Pseudomonas syringae effector avrB confers soybean cultivar-specific avirulence on Soybean mosaic virus adapted for transgene expression but effector avrPto does not. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interact 19: 304-312.
  • Wen R.H., Saghai Maroof M.A., and Hajimorad M.R. 2011. Amino acid changes in P3, and not the overlapping pipo-encoded protein, determine virulence of Soybean mosaic virus on functionally immune Rsv1-genotype soybean. Molecular Plant Pathology 12: 799-807.
  • Wen R.H., Khatabi B., Ashfild T., Saghai Maroof M.A., and Hajimorad M.R. The HC-Pro and P3 cistrons of an avirulent Soybean mosaic virus are recognized by different resistance genes at the complex Rsv1 locus. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 26(2): 203-215.
  • Widyasary K., Alazem M., and Kim K. 2020. Soybean resistance to Soybean Mosaic Virus. Plants 9(2): 219-238.
  • Zhang C., Hajimorad M.R., Eggenberger A.L., Tsang S., Whitham S.A., and Hill J.H. 2009. Cytoplasmic inclusion of Soybean mosaic virus serves as avirulence determinant on Rsv3-genotype soybean and a symptom determinant. Virology 391: 240-248.