مطالعه تأثیر همجواری و تغییرات کیفیت نور بر بروز برخی از مکانیسم‌های اجتناب از سایه در گیاه لوبیا قرمز (Phaseolus vulgaris)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه اگروتکنولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

برگ گیاه، با قابلیت فیلترسازی طیف‌های مختلف نور سبب تغییر در کیفیت نور می­گردد. تغییر در کیفیت نور سبب بروز پدیده­ای با عنوان مکانیسم‌های اجتناب از سایه در گیاه می­شود. به منظور ارزیابی اثر همجواری بر مکانیسم‌های اجتناب از سایه در گیاه لوبیا قرمز، آزمایشی به صورت گلدانی در تابستان 96 و بهار 97 در گلخانه­ی تحقیقاتی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد اجراء شد. آزمایش در قالب طرح کاملا تصادفی با چهار تکرار و شامل چهار تیمار عدم همجواری (رشد گیاه بدون حضور گونه‌ی همجوار) و رشد گیاه مرکزی به ترتیب همجوار با 1، 2 و 3 بوته لوبیا قرمز انجام گرفت. در پایان آزمایش نسبت نور قرمز به قرمز دور (R:FR) ارتفاع، زیست­توده­ی اندام­های گیاه، شاخص سطح برگ، طول دمبرگ، تقارن گیاه، حجم تاج گیاه و تانژانت زاویه‌ی پایین­ترین برگ گیاه به عنوان برخی از مکانیسم‌های اجتناب از سایه مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد کمترین میزان کیفیت نور رسیده به تاج‌پوشش لوبیا قرمز به میزان 50/0 از تیمار سه بوته‌ی همجوار به دست آمد. بیشترین میزان ارتفاع (28 سانتی‌متر) و کمترین میزان طول دمبرگ (55/4 سانتی­متر) از تیمار عدم هم‌جواری حاصل شد. همچنین بعد از تفکیک گیاه به قسمت‌های چپ و راست بیشترین نرخ برهم‌خوردگی تقارن از تیمار یک بوته­ی همجوار (23/0 درصد) بدست آمد. تانژانت زاویه­ی پایین­ترین برگ گیاه (35/1) از تیمار 3 بوته­ی همجوار حاصل شد که نشان از تلاش بیشتر برگ­ها جهت کشیدگی خود به سمت بالا می­باشند. در این آزمایش، تاثیر کیفیت نور بر روی دو مولفه (تقارن و تانژانت زاویه­ی برگ اول) برای اولین بار به عنوان مکانیسم­های اجتناب از سایه معرفی گردید. همچنین افزایش تعداد گیاهان همجوار به دلیل کاهش کیفیت نور سبب بروز مکانیسم­های اجتناب از سایه از جمله کاهش رشد عرضی، کاهش شاخص سطح برگ و زیست­توده­ی برگ گردید. بنابراین در گیاهانی مانند لوبیاقرمز که تولید غلاف و حصول عملکرد با رشد عرضی و تولید شاخه­های فرعی همبستگی دارد، بررسی نقش کیفیت نور و مکانیسم­های اجتناب از سایه از اهمیت بالایی برخوردار می­باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Adjacent Plants Number on Shade Avoidance Syndrome Mechanism of Red Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

نویسندگان [English]

  • ali bagheri
  • Ghorbanali Asadi
  • Ali ghanbari
Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The light received by plants is composed of different types of wavelengths (sanged from ultraviolet to infrared). The region among 400 nm to 700 nm is what plants use to drive photosynthesis, typically referred as Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR). Plants are so proper light filters. Leaf chlorophylls and carotenoids absorb and use most of the R light available for photosynthesis, but reflect or transmit most of the FR light, those parts of light which transmitted through vegetation, depleted in red and strongly enriched in far-red even before direct shading takes place. The natural R:FR ratio varies from 1 to 1.2 in sunlight above a canopy, gradually decreasing to lower to 0.2 under a dense canopy. Red to Far Red ratio (R:FR) is considered as an indicator of the light quality. Plants are able to detect changing in light quality via their phytochromes. Understanding the decrease of light quality create a series of reactions in the plant such as stem elongation, reduction in stem diameter, and reduction in shoot and root biomass and so forth that are known as shade avoidance syndrome (SAS). In this research, a pot experiment established to evaluate the effects of neighboring on shade avoidance mechanism in red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris).
Material and Methods: Pot experiment was conducted based completely randomized designs with four replications at the Research Greenhouse of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 2016 and 2017. The treatments included the red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) growth without neighboring and 1, 2 and 3 red bean plants as neighbors. In each pots (23 cm diameter and 21.5 cm height), 3 to 4 red bean seeds (Straight, Derakhshan) were planted and finally one plant was selected and kept for 45 days. The distance between each treatment was one meter for keeping plants away from mutual shading. In each treatment, 25 cm distant was considered between pots. After 45 days, R:FR ratio was measured beneath the canopy using a quantum sensor (SKR 200 model) subsequently, the main plant were harvested and some traits were measured. Shoot height, petiole length, and area of canopy, first leaf and plant symmetry. Then plants separated into leaves and stems. After measuring the total leaf area using LI-3000 area meter, plant parts were oven-dried at 80°C and weighed. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for completely randomized design was performed for all responses using PROC GLM in SAS 9.3. Treatment means were compared using either the LSD test or single degree of freedom contrasts.
Results and Discussion: Result of this experiment showed that by increasing the number of neighboring plants to 3 plants,  the light quality (R to FR ratio) decreased down to 0.5 in 3 plants neighbored treatment. Accordingly, changing the light quality influenced the traits reactions. By increasing the adjacent plants number, shoot and plant height were increased. The highest plant (28 cm) and shortest (4.55 cm) petiole length was recorded in the non-neighbor treatment. To measure the leaf biomass, plants were separated into the left (that part of plant with growth opposite the neighbor) and right (toward neighbor plant growth). Result showed that in the trait with 1 plant in neighborhood, symmetry of plant was impaired (0.23 percent). In the trait with 3 neighbors, the first leaf angle was 1/35 that indicates plants attempt to reach towards high light quality. In this experiment, plant symmetry and plant angle was proposed as a shade avoidance syndrome. One main result in this experiment was reduce in area of canopy and reduction in lateral growth and production of branches in plant. In some crops such as legumes, lateral expansion to making pods is the main part of yield. Reaching out for light and increase in plant height would suppress the lateral growth which impact the productivity of plant. Moreover, diminish in leaf aria index reduce the leaf dry matter, as the main photosynthetic organs decreased. Finally, result of this experiment and those study on shade avoidance effect on crop destiny, should be considered in yield gap estimation. In these sort of experiments, total icons involve in yield diminish is considered except shade avoidance. Role of light quality also should be noted in future studies.  

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Competition
  • Leaf angle
  • light quality
  • Shading
  • Symmetry
  1. Afifi M., Lee E., Lukens L., and Swanton C. 2015. Thiamethoxam as a seed treatment alters the physiological response of maize (Zea mays) seedlings to neighboring weeds. Pest Management Science 71(4): 505-514.
  2. Awal M.A., and Gani M.O. 2020. Study on Radiation Interception and Use in Some Mustard Varieties. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports 11-23.
  3. Ballaré C.L., and Pierik R. 2017. The shade‐avoidance syndrome: multiple signals and ecological consequences. Plant, Cell and Environment 40(11): 2530-2543.
  4. Bauer D., Viczián A., Kircher S., Nobis T., Nitschke R., Kunkel T., ... and Nagy F. 2004. Constitutive photomorphogenesis 1 and multiple photoreceptors control degradation of phytochrome interacting factor 3, a transcription factor required for light signaling in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 16(6): 1433-1445.
  5. Casal J.J. 2013. Canopy light signals and crop yield in sickness and in health. ISRN Agronomy.
  6. Dudley S.A., Murphy G.P., and File A.L. 2013. Kin recognition and competition in plants. Functional Ecology 27(4): 898-906.
  7. De Wit M., Kegge W., Evers J.B., Vergeer-van Eijk M.H., Gankema P., Voesenek L.A., and Pierik R. 2012. Plant neighbor detection through touching leaf tips precedes phytochrome signals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(36) :14705-14710.
  8. Demotes-Mainard S., Péron T., Corot A., Bertheloot J., Le Gourrierec J., Pelleschi-Travier S., and Vian A. 2016. Plant responses to red and far-red lights, applications in horticulture. Environmental and Experimental Botany 121: 4-21.
  9. Fraser D.P., Hayes S., and Franklin K.A. 2016. Photoreceptor crosstalk in shade avoidance. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 33: 1-7.
  10. Huq E. 2018. Direct Convergence of Light and Auxin Signaling Pathways in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant 11(4): 515-517.
  11. Iglesias M. J., Sellaro R., Zurbriggen D., Casal J. J. 2018. Multiple links between shade avoidance and auxin networks. Journal of Experimental Botany 69(2): 213-228.
  12. Kim H.W., sadeghi A., McKenzie –Gopsill A., Afifi M., Bozzo G., Lee E.A., and Swanton C.J. 2016. Changes in light quality alter physiological responses of soybean to thiamethoxam. Planta 244(3): 639-650.
  13. Maddonni G.A,. Otegui M.E., Andrieu B., Chelle M., and Casal J.J. 2002. Maize leaves turn away from neighbors. Plant Physiology 130(3): 1181–1189.
  14. Martínez-García J.F., Gallemí M., Molina-Contreras M.J., Llorente B., Bevilaqua M.R., and Quail P.H. 2014. The shade avoidance syndrome in Arabidopsis: the antagonistic role of phytochrome A and B differentiates vegetation proximity and canopy shade. PloS one 9(10): e109275.
  15. Moradi R., Koocheki A., and Nasiri Mahallati M. 2017. Evaluation of economical yield and radiation use efficiency of maize and cotton in sole and‎ intercropping systems as affected by different levels of Nitrogen. Isfahan University of Technology-Journal of Crop Production and Processing 7(2): 47-59. (In Persian with English abstract)
  16. Nozue K., Tat A.V., Devisetty U.K., Robinson M., Mumbach M.R., Ichihashi Y., and Maloof J.N. 2015. Shade avoidance components and pathways in adult plants revealed by phenotypic profiling. PLoS Genetics 11(4): e1004953.
  17. Page E.R., Tollenaar M., Lee E.A., Lukens L., and Swanton C.J. 2015. Shade avoidance: an integral component of crop weed competition. Weed Research 50: 281–288.
  18. Prasch C.M., and Sonnewald U. 2015. Signaling events in plants: Stress factors in combination change the picture. Environmental and Experimental Botany 114: 4-14.
  19. Rajcan I., and Swanton C.J. 2001. Understanding maize-weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant. Field Crop Research 71:139–150.
  20. Roig-Villanova I., and Martínez-García J.F. 2016. Plant responses to vegetation proximity: a whole life avoiding shade. Frontiers in Plant Science 7.
  21. Saadatian B., Ahmadvand G., and Soleymani F. 2011. Investigation of growth indices and yield of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in competition with rye (Secale cereale L.) and wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) weeds. (In Persian with English abstract).
  22. Vialet-Chabrand S., Matthews J.S., Simkin A.J., Raines C.A., and Lawson T. 2017. Importance of fluctuations in light on plant photosynthetic acclimation. Plant Physiology 173(4): 2163-2179.
  23. Wille W., Pipper C. B., Rosenqvist E., Andersen S.B., Weiner J., and Jackson M.B. 2017. Reducing shade avoidance responses in a cereal crop. Aob Plants 9(5).
  24. Yaghoubi S. R., Aghaalikhani M., and Zand E. 2011. Effect of the timing of emergence of seedling on morphological characteristics and seed production of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) in competition with sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 13(1): 32-48.
  25. Yang C., and Li L. 2017. Hormonal regulation in shade avoidance. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 15-27.