فلور و ساختار جوامع علف‌های هرز نظام‌های زراعی و باغی بردسکن

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته دکتری علوم علف‌های هرز گروه اگروتکنولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

2 دانشیار گروه اگروتکنولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

3 استادیار پژوهشکده علوم گیاهی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

به منظور بررسی فلور و ساختار جوامع علف­های هرز مزارع و باغات شهرستان بردسکن، جمعیّت علف­های هرز این شهرستان در 10 محصول زراعی و باغی گندم، کلزا، چغندرقندپاییزه، پنبه، زیره­سبز، خربزه، پسته، انگور، انار و زعفران در سال 1395 مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. نمونه­برداری­ها به صورت تصادفی و در ادامه به صورت سیستماتیک و طبق الگوی w با استفاده از کادر 5/0 در 5/0 متر انجام شد. در این مطالعه 106 گونه علف­هرز متعلق به 30 خانواده گیاهی شناسایی شد که بیشترین تعداد گونه را تیره­های  Poaceae(22 گونه)، Brassicaceae (15 گونه) و Asteraceae (13 گونه) به خود اختصاص دادند. از مجموع 106 گونه گیاهی شناسایی شده، 80 گونه (47/75 درصد) پهن­برگ و 26 گونه (53/24 درصد) باریک­برگ بودند. از نظر چرخه زندگی 82 گونه علف­هرز (36/77 درصد) یکساله و 24 گونه (64/22 درصد) چندساله بودند. از نظر مسیر فتوسنتزی 82 گونه (36/77 درصد) دارای مسیر فتوسنتزی سه­کربنه، 23 گونه (7/21 درصد) چهارکربنه و یک گونه (94/0 درصد) دارای مسیر فتوسنتزی CAM بودند. در بین محصولات مورد مطالعه، بیشترین تعداد گونه علف­هرز متعلق به زعفران (61 گونه) و پسته (55 گونه) و کمترین تعداد گونه متعلق به پنبه (26 گونه) و کلزا (28 گونه) بود. در بین علف­های هرز پهن­برگ، تلخه، شاهی وحشی، شب­بوی صحرایی، سلمه­تره، خارشتر، کهورک، هفت­بند، پیچک، علف­شور، آتریپلکس و در بین علف­های­هرز باریک­برگ جوموشی، جودره، چچم، یولاف­وحشی، پنجه­مرغی و خونی­واش از نظر غالبیت نسبی، فراوانی و تراکم بوته در متر مربع بیشترین حضور و اهمیت را داشتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Flora and Structure of Weed Communities of Agro and Orchard Ecosystems in Bardaskan

نویسندگان [English]

  • esmail ebrahimi 1
  • E. Izadi Darbandi 2
  • F. Memariani 3
1 Ph.D. Graduted of Weed Science , Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 Associate Professor, Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
3 Assistant Professor, Research Center for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Weeds are among the major constraints to crops growth that can affect yield based on their species composition and density. Weed competition reduces yield and consequently farm income. Weeds infestation also encourages disease problems, serves alternate host for deleterious insects and diseases, slows down harvesting, restricts operations, increases the cost of production and reduces the market value of crops. Weed flora composition is strongly associated with regional climate, soil and irrigation water characteristics, and management methods. Weeds dispersal power is amongst the major factors affecting the agricultural plants success. Diversity reflects the complexity of a system and can maintain its sustainability. Higher diversity results in higher inherent complexity of agro-ecosystems and strengthens their processes. It is necessary to realize the spatial distribution and temporal properties of the biodiversity components in agro-ecosystems, for the conservation and optimal utilization. Since weeds as complementary components of agro-ecosystems are inseparable, studying species and their functional and structural diversity plays an important role in weed management and balance of ecological systems. Weeds are highly problematic in agricultural systems in Bardaskan county reducing yield quality and quality. However, the first step in weed management is identifying the flora. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the flora and structure of weed communities of agricultural and horticultural products in Bardaskan-Iran.
Material and Methods: In order to study flora and structure of weed communities of fields and orchards in Bardaskan county, this research was conducted on wheat, rapeseed, autumn sugarbeet, cotton, cumin, melon, pistachia, vineyard, pomegranate and saffron during 2016. Sampling was performed using the W systematic method proposed by Thomas (1985) and McCauley et al. (1991) by using 0.5×0.5-meter quadrate with a slight modification (random systemic method of W instead of systemic of W method). The basis of sampling was systematic, but after determining the main sampling points with intervals of 20 steps on the W system as the main sampling points, other sampling points were randomly selected as sub-sampling points within a radius of 5 to 10 m from the main sampling points to increase the sampling accuracy. Sampling was not performed to remove the marginal effects depending on the farm and garden up to 20 meters from the farm margin. The weeds in each quadrat were counted and their genera and species were identified and weed population indices including mean relative density, relative uniformity and frequently were calculated.
Results and Discussion: In this study, 106 weed species belonging to 30 families were identified which the most species were from Poaceae with 22 species, Brassicaceae with 15 species and Asteraceae with 13 species. From the 106 identified weed species, 80 species (75.47%) were broad-leaf and 26 species (24.53%) were grassy weeds. In terms of life cycle, 82 weed species (77.36%) were annual and 24 species were perennial. Based on photosynthetic pathway, 82 species (77.36%) had C3 photosynthetic pathway, 23 species (21.7%) C4 and one species (0.94%) was CAM photosynthetic pathway. Among the studied crops, the largest number of weed species were observed for saffron (61 species) and pistachia (55 species) and the lowest species were found for cotton (26 species) and rapeseed (28 species). The broadleaf species of Russian knapweed, hoary cress, African rocket, lambsquarters, camel thorn, mesquite, prostrate knotweed, field bindweed, Russian thistle, common orach and the grassy weed species of mouse barley, wild barley, ryegrass, wild oat, bermudagrass and lesser canarygrass had the highest relative dominance, frequency and density (plant m-2).
Conclusion: In general, a wide range of broadleaf and grassy weeds especially Poaceae and Brassicaceae families was found in the studied area. Overall, the results showed that most weeds identified in this study can grow in different environmental conditions and their growth is less dependent on growth condition. Therefore, presence of some weed species in all studied fields and orchards indicates the possibility of their growth under different environments and managements. Therefore, difference in management strategies and climates can be considered as one of the important factors of differences in the flora and population structure of weed communities in Bardaskan.
It seems that weed management in Bardaskan county is inappropriate for various reasons including farmers' lack of knowledge on weeds control, application of inappropriate chemical technologies, and the lack of specific herbicides in some products.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Abundance Index
  • Density
  • Frequency
  • Photosynthetic pathway
  1. Ahmadi K., Gholizadeh H., Ebadzadeh H.R., Hatami F., Hosseinpoor R., Kazemifard R., and Abdshah H. 2015. Agriculture - Iran - Statistics, Communication and Information Technology Center. Ministry of Agriculture.
  2. Andreasen C., Stryhn H., and Streibig J.C. 1996. Decline of the flora on Danish arable fields. Applied Ecology 33: 619-626.
  3. Bukun B. 2005. Weed flora changes in cotton growing areas during the las decade after irrigation of Harran Plain in Sanlurfa. Turkey. Pakistan Journal Botanical 37(3): 667-672.
  4. Dale M.R.T., Thomas A.G., and John E.A. 1992. Environmental factors including management practices as correlates of weed community composition in spring seeded crops. Canadian. Journal of Botany 70: 1931–1939.
  5. Dyanat M. 2017. Biodiversity and species composition of weeds at pomegranate and pistachio Orchards in Qom Province. Weed Ecology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University. 99-110. (In Persian with English abstract)
  6. Elahi S., Sadrabadi Haghighi R., and Alimoradi L. 2010. Evaluation of special, functional and structural diversity of weeds community in pistachios (Pistacia vera L.) orchards of Bardaskan County. Journal of Agroecology 2: 574-586. (In Persian with English abstract)
  7. Fallah Mehrjardi H., Minbashi Moeini M., Mirvakili S.M., and Dianat M. 2012. Weed mapping of pomegranate and pistachio gardens by using Geographic Information System (GIS) in Meybod and Ardekan counties. Journal of Agroecology, 1: 89-103. (In Persian with English abstract)
  8. Fried G., Norton L.R., and Reboud X. 2008. Environmental and management factors determininig weed species composition and diversity in France. Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 128: 68-76.
  9. Jannati AtaieS.,Pirdashty H., Kazemi H., and Younesabadi M. 2016. Mapping the distribution and flora of the weeds in canola fields of Gorgan Township by geographic information system (GIS). Journal of Plant Protection, 4: 605-616. (In Persian with English abstract)
  10. Izadi-Darbandi E., and Hosseini Evari Z. 2017. Study of flora and structure of weed communities of saffron fields in Kashmar and Khalil Abad counties. Journal of Saffron Research 4: 249-265. (In Persian with English abstract)
  11. Izadi -Darbandi E., Mirzaei M., and Mehdikhani H. 2018. Evaluation of flora and distribution of weeds in pistachio (Pistacia vera) orchards of Kerman city. Journal of Plant Protection 32(1): 59-69. (In Persian with English abstract)
  12. Khanjani M., Rastgoo M., Izadi Darbandi E., and Minbashi Moeini M. 2017. Investigating weed flora changes in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) fields of Tehran province in a decade: 2005 to 2015. Iranian Journal of Weed Science, 13:157-173. (In Persian with English abstract)
  13. Kumar S., Bhattacharya M., Sarkar B., and Arunachalam V. 20007. Weed floristic composition in plamgardens in plains of Eastern Himalayan region of West Bengal. Current Science 92: 1434-1439.
  14. Major Z.A., Ditommaso J., Lehmann N.P.S., and Falcao B. 2005. Weed dynamics on Amazonian Dark Earth and adjacent soils of Brazil Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 111: 1-12.
  15. Makarian H., Rashed Mohassel M.H., Bannayan M., and Nassiri M. 2008. Spatial dynamics of weed populations in saffron (Crocus sativus) field using geostatistics. Journal of Agricultureal Science and Natural Resource 15: 76-83. (In Persian with English abstract)
  16. McCully K.M., Simpson G., and Watson A.K. 1991. Weed survey of Nova Scotia Lowbush (Vaccinilum angustifolium) fields. Weed Science 39: 180-185.
  17. Memon R.A. 2004. Weed flora composition of wheat and cotton crops in district khairpur, sindh. Ph.D thesis, Shad Abdul Latif Univecity, Khairpur.
  18. Minbashi Moeini M., Baghestani M.A., and Mashhadi H.R. 2008. Introducing an abundance index forassessing weed flora in survey studies. Weed Biology & Management 8: 172-180.
  19. Mosavi M. 2010. Weeds control (Principles and Methods). Publications of Marz-e-Danesh. Center of Printing and Distribution of Academic Books. Pp. 19.
  20. Mousavi S.K., Sori N., Zeidali A.A., Azadbakht N., and Ghiasvand M. 2010. Compare of flora and determine the status of weeds in the orchards of Khorramabad County. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8: 252-268. (In Persian with English abstract)
  21. Narimani V., Minbashi Moeini M., and Mohamadi Poor M. 2009. Evaluation and determination weed dominance with guantitative index in wheat and barley fields in Eastern Azarbaeejan. The 9th Iranian Crop Sciences Congress, Abouryhan Campus, University of Tehran.
  22. Padarloo A.A., Izadi Darbandi E., Rashed Mohassel M.H., and Feizi H. 2017. Study of flora and structure of weed communities of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) fields in the Khorasan Razavi province, Saffron Agronomy & Technology 6: 339-353. (In Persian with English abstract)
  23. Rao V.S. 2000. Principles of weed science (Second Edition). Science Publisher Inc. PP. 558. Streibig, J. C. and C. Andreasen. 1993. Crop management affects the community dynamics of weed. Brighton crop protection conference – weeds. Pages: 487-494.
  24. Rashed Mohassel M.H. 1992. Weeds of South Khorasan saffron fields. Agricultural Science and Technology 6: 118-135. (In Persian with English abstract)
  25. Shemdo R.S., Mbago F.M., Kikula I.S., and Van Damme P.L. 2008. Weed species diversity on arable land of the dryland areas of central Tanzania: impacts of continuous application of traditional tillage practices. GeoJournal 61: 107-115.
  26. Showler A.T., and Greenberg M.S. 2003. Effect of weed on selected arthropod herbivore and natural enemy population and yield. Environment. Entomology 32:39-50.
  27. Thomas A.G. 1985.Weed survey system used in saskathevan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed Science 33: 34-43.
  28. Younesabadi M., Habibian L., and Savarinrjad A. 2016.Evaluation of species, functional and structural diversity of weeds in Golestan province cotton fields. Iranian J Cotton Researchs 2: 79-100. (In Persian with English abstract)
  29. Zand E., Nezamabadi N., Baghestani M.A., Shimi P., and Mousavi S.K. 2019. A guide to chemical control of weeds in Iran. Jehade Daneshgahi of Mashhad Press.