Effect of Trichoderma harizianum Strain T22 on Induced Resistance of Tomato to Helicoverpa armigera Hübner

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Biodiversity, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Biodiversity, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran.

3 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

4 Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
 Beneficial soil microorganisms such as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), mycorrhiza fungi, endophytic fungi and plant growth-promoting fungi can increase plant growth and their defense against some plant diseases and insect pests. Some species of Trichoderma spp. known as plant growth stimulants are found in many soils where crops are grown, especially around the rhizosphere. These species increase growth rate, nutrient uptake, plant efficiency and defense ability against herbivorous insects. In this regard, a very important approach is the use of microorganisms that enhance plant growth, which achieves optimal plant performance and reduces pest damage and environmental pollution.
Materials and Methods
 In this study, the seeds of Falat cultivar were inoculated with spores of T. harizianum strainT22 (30 mg of 5 mg suspension of fungal spores were inoculated next to the plant), which they were cultivated under greenhouse conditions (25 ±5 °C, 55±5% RH 16: 8 h, L: D). First to fourth instar larvae of Helicoverpa armigera were placed on the leaf and fourth to sixth instar larvae were placed on the fruit of treated or untreated plants (as control). Then the relative growth rate of larvae, larval developmental time, percentage of larval mortality and total fecundity and fertility of adult female were recorded. Also, some growth and biochemical parameters of the experimental plants were measured.
Results and Discussion
 The results showed that the larval developmental time and percentage of larval mortality were significantly higher than these parameters in insects raised on control plants and in contrast to, the relative larval growth rate and total fecundity and fertility of female insects in treated plants was significantly less than these indicators in insects fed to control plants. Amounts of some micro- and macro- elements, number of leaves, root volume, fruit weight per plant (yield), the amount activities of polyphenol oxidase and catalase enzymes as well as amounts of proline and hydrogen peroxide in plants treated with fungi were significantly more than these parameters on control plants. Stimulation of the plant's defense system by the use of this fungi, which has resulted in the production of more plant defense products, proline and hydrogen peroxide. This fungus stimulates the plants defense system in the direction of different metabolic pathways of different defense materials. Since the production of proline and hydrogen peroxide is the same in the metabolic pathway, the production of these two defense molecules in treated plants has increased significantly. Comparing the amounts of these two molecules in plants that have not been fed by larvae is also quite clear that the presence of this fungus has stimulated the plant's defense system. In plants fed on pest larvae, these values have increased significantly due to damage to the fruit tissue of the tomato plant. The production of proline and hydrogen peroxide are in the same metabolic pathway, the production of these two defense molecules in treated plants has increased significantly. Comparing the amounts of these two molecules in plants that have not been fed by the larvae of the pest is also quite clear that the presence of this fungus has stimulated the plant's defense system. In plants fed on pest larvae, these values have increased significantly due to damage to the fruit tissue of the tomato plant
Conclusion
 This study is the first evidence that indicated positively affected by T. harizianum strain T22 on the strength of tomato plant response in both aspects of higher nutrient uptake and increase its vegetative and reproductive growth, as well as increasing the function of the plants defense system in response to feeding of fruits of tomato. From the results of this study, it is inferred that the use of biological product of T. harizianum T22 helped to absorb more nutrients to the plant and stimulated and strengthened the plant's defense system against the attack of tomato fruit worm. The results of this study show that the use of beneficial soil microorganisms to strengthen plant defenses in terms of crop protection is a promising strategy to control an important group of pests such as vegetarians to reduce the use of pesticides. Finally, the results of this study proved that inductive resistance can be used as an important tool for pest management to reduce the use of chemical insecticides.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abdul-Wahid, O.A., & Elbanna, S.M. (2012). Evaluation of the insecticidal activity of Fusarium solani and Trichoderma harzianum against cockroaches; Periplaneta americana. African Journal of Microbiology Research 6: 1024-1032. ‏http://doi.org/10.5897/Agmeri11.300.
  2. Alinc, T., Cusumano, A., Peri, E., Torta, L., & Colazza, S. (2021). Trichoderma harzianum strain T22 modulates direct defense of tomato plants in response to Nezara viridula feeding activity. Journal of Chemical Ecology 47: 455-462. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-021-01260-3.
  3. Amini, S., Ghobadi, S., & Yamchi, A. (2015). Proline accumulation and osmotic stress: an overview of P5CS gene in plants. Journal of plant Molecular Breeding 3: 44-5. http://doi.org/22058/JPMB.2015.17022.
  4. Azimi, S., Saedeh, S., & Alizadeh, A. (2020). Effect of bean plant treatment with Trichoderma harzianum TR6 on the biology of bean aphid Aphis fabae. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Protection 10: 1-16. (In Persian with English Abstract)
  5. Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P., & Teare, I.D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205-207. ‏
  6. Battaglia, D., Bossi, S., Cascone, P., Digilio, M.C., Prieto, J.D., Fanti, P., Guerrieri, E., Iodice, L., Lingua, G., & Lorito, M. (2013). Tomato below ground-above ground interactions: Trichoderma longibrachiatum affects the performance of Macrosiphum euphorbiae and its natural antagonists. Molecular Plant Microbe Interaction 26: 1249–1256.
  7. Bi, J.L., & felton, G.W. (1995). Foliar oxidative stress and insect herbivory: Primary compounds, secondary metabolites, and reactive oxygen species as components of induced resistance. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 1511–1530.
  8. Cardoza, Y.J., Klepzig, K.D., & Raffa, K.F. (2006). Bacteria in oral secretions of an endophytic insect inhibit antagonistic fungi. Ecological Entomology 31: 636-645.
  9. ‏Chance, B., & Maehly, A.C. (1955) Assay of Catalase and Peroxidase. Methods in Enzymology 2: 764-775.
  10. Coppola, M., Cascone, P., Di Lelio, I., Woo, SL., Lorito, M., Rao, R., Pennacchio, F., Guerrieri, E., & Digilio, M.C. (2019). Trichoderma atroviride P1 colonization of tomato plants enhances both direct and indirect defense barriers against insects. Front Physiology 10: 1–12.
  11. Dicke, M., & Hilker, M. (2003). Induced plant defences: from molecular biology to evolutionary ecology. Basic Appllied Ecology 4: 3–14.
  12. Fitt, G.P., Zalucki, M.P., & Twine, P. (1989). Temporal and spatial patterns in pheromone-trap catches of Helicoverpa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in cotton-growing areas of Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research 79: 145-161.
  13. Gull, A., Lone, A.A., & Wani, N. (2019). Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Plants. http://org/10.5772/intechopen.85832.
  14. Harman, G.E., Howell, C.R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I., & Lorito, M. (2004). Trichoderma species—opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature reviews Microbiology 2: 43-56.
  15. Kessler, A., & Baldwin, I.T. (2001). Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291: 2141–2144.
  16. Mazzi, D., & Dorn, S. 2012. Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology 160: 97-113.‏ http://org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2012.00533.x.
  17. Ousley, M.A., Lynch, J.M., & Whipps, J.M. (1994). Potential of Trichoderma as consistent plant growth stimulators. Biology and Fertility of Soils 17: 85-90.
  18. Qing-hua, Y., Li, Y., Qing, W., & Xiao-Qin, M. (2012). Determination of major and trace elements in six herbal drugs for relieving heat and toxicity by ICP-AES with microwave digestion. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 16: 287-290. ‏
  19. Santamarina-Fojo, S., Peterson, K., Knapper, C., Qiu, Y., Freeman, L., Cheng, J.F., & Brewer, H.B. (2000). Complete genomic sequence of the human ABCA1 gene: analysis of the human and mouse ATP-binding cassette A promoter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97: 7987-7992. ‏
  20. Smith, R.J., Lee, E.C., Kimberling, W.J., Daiger, S.P., Pelias, M.Z., Keats, B.J., & Hejtmancik, J.F. (1992). Localization of two genes for Usher syndrome type I to chromosome 11. Genomics 14: 995-1002. ‏
  21. Tefera, T., & Vidal, S. (2009). Effect of inoculation method and plant growth medium on endophytic colonization of sorghum by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. BioControl 54: 663-669. http://doi.org/1007/s10526-009-9216-y. ‏
  22. Velikova, V., Yordanov, I., & Edreva, A. (2000). Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Science 151: 59-66.
  23. Vinale, F., Sivasithamparam, K., Ghisalberti, E.L., Marra, R., Wooa, S.L., & Lorito, M. (2008). Trichoderma- plant- pathogen interactions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40: 1-10. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-012-0308-5.
  24. War, A.R., Paulraj, M.G., Ahmad, T., Buhroo, A.A., Hussain, B., Ignacimuthu, S., & Sharma, H.C. (2012). Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal Behavior 7: 1306-1320. http://doi.org/10.4161/psb.21663.
  25. Wesche-Ebeling, P., & Montgomery, M.W. (1990). Strawberry polyphenoloxidase: Extraction and partial characterization. Journal of Food Science 55: 1320–1324.
  26. Windham, MT., Elad, Y., & Baker, R. (1986). Mechanism for increased plant growth induced by Trichoderma Phytopathology 76: 518–521.
  27. Zalucki, M.P., Daglish, G., Firempong, S., & Twine, P. (1986). The biology and ecology of Heliothis armigera (Hubner) and Heliothis punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Australia-What do we know. Australian Journal of Zoology 34: 779-814. ‏
  28. Zhang, Y., Zhou, H., Tang, Y., Luo, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Hydrogen peroxide regulated salicylic acid– and jasmonic acid–dependent systemic defenses in tomato seedlings. Food Science and Technology 42: e54920. http://org/10.1590/fst.54920.
CAPTCHA Image