کاربرد چند اصلاح‌کننده خاک برای کنترل نماتد ریشه‌گرهی (Meloidogyne incognita) در گیاهان کیوی (Actinidia deliciosa) در غرب استان گیلان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه گیاه پزشکی، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

2 گروه گیاه‌پزشکی، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

چکیده

امروزه به‌منظور کاهش اثرات مخرب زیست‌محیطی ناشی از کاربرد سموم، روش‌های جایگزین جهت کنترل عوامل خسارت‌زای گیاهی مورد توجه قرار دارد. در این ارتباط، استفاده از اصلاح‌کننده‌های خاک برای کنترل نماتدها مناسب تشخیص داده شده است. در این تحقیق، شش تیمار ورمی‌کمپوست، کود مرغی، ضایعات کلم، کاشت کلم بروکلی، ورمی‌واش و کود مرغی مایع در چهار تکرار، دو سال متوالی و در سه منطقه از غرب استان گیلان، جهت کنترل نماتد ریشه‌گرهی به کار گرفته شد. ارزیابی براساس شاخص‌های آلودگی به نماتد (تعداد گال، تعداد توده تخم در هر گرم ریشه، تعداد لارو و تخم در هر گرم ریشه، تعداد لارو سن دوم در صد گرم خاک و فاکتور تولیدمثل) در باغ کیوی انجام شد. به‌منظور ارزیابی بهتر میزان کارآیی تیمارهای ذکر شده، شاهد مثبت، شاهد منفی و سم راگبی نیز به‌عنوان تیمار مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد که تمامی تیمارها با شاهد دارای اختلاف معنی‌دار بوده و به خوبی توانستند تعداد گال و جمعیت نماتد را کاهش دهند. بهترین تیمار جهت کنترل نماتد، کود مرغی بوده که نسبت به شاهد، تعداد گال، تعداد توده تخم، تعداد لارو و تخم در هر گرم ریشه، تعداد لارو سن دوم در صد گرم خاک و فاکتور تولیدمثل را به‌ترتیب 7/86 درصد، 7/76، 8/89، 3/90 و 91 درصد کاهش داد. نتایج نشان داد کم‌ اثرترین تیمار جهت کنترل نماتد، ورمی‌کمپوست بود که نسبت به شاهد تعداد گال، تعداد توده تخم، تعداد لارو و تخم در هر گرم ریشه، تعداد لارو سن دوم در صد گرم خاک و فاکتور تولیدمثل را به‌ترتیب 8/78، 36، 4/65، 7/64 و 1/65 درصد تقلیل داد. نتایج به‌دست آمده از این پژوهش، نشان از قابلیت این ترکیبات و امکان به کارگیری آنها در مدیریت تلفیقی نماتد ریشه‌گرهی دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Use of Several Soil Amendments to Control the Root-knot Nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) in the West of Guilan Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zohreh Alipour Plang Koli 1
  • S. Jamali 2
  • Sedigheh Mousanejad 1
  • Hassan Pedramfar 1
1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Gilan, Rasht, Iran
2 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Gilan, Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction[1]
Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are among the most important soil-borne pathogens that cause serious economic damage to orchards and agricultural products. Over 2000 plant species are attacked by root-knot nematodes. Root-Knot Nematodes limit the absorption of water and nutrients, and create favorable conditions for infection by root-pathogenic microorganisms in many crops, resulting in the formation of giant cells. Due to their high reproductive rate, RKN management is challenging. Meloidogyne species can be controlled using various methods, including agricultural practices, resistant cultivars, and chemical nematicides, which are easier and more effective to use. The use of chemical nematicides has decreased due to health and environmental concerns. The agricultural community needs new and alternative management strategies, especially those that are environmentally acceptable. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of several combinations of chicken manure, liquid chicken manure, vermicompost, vermiwash, cabbage and broccoli waste in the management of root-knot nematodes in kiwi orchards.
 
Materials and Methods
Inspection and sampling were carried out in kiwi orchards in the western province of Guilan (Talesh and Astara) to determine the infected orchards for planned treatments. The nematode species were identified by using morphological characteristics of perineal pattern, and second-stage juveniles. Three orchards located in Asalem, Lisar, and Lavandevil were selected based on their high similarity in terms of contamination level and other characteristics such as tree age, row distance, irrigation, slope, and soil type. Nine treatments were applied using a complete randomized block design for three months. The treatments consisted of 40 tons of chicken manure, vermicompost, and cabbage waste per hectare, planting of broccoli, vermiwash, and liquid chicken manure (one liter per tree). Ragbi was also used as a nematicide at a rate of 10 g/m3 alongside other treatments. For the application of chicken manure, vermicompost, and cabbage waste, the area of the plant's nutrient root expansion was first determined. Then, the desired amount of treatments was mixed with the soil at a depth of 3 to 30 centimeters. After preparing the designated plots, broccoli seedlings were planted around the damaged trees.
 
Results and Discussion
Based on the morphological and histological characteristics, the studied species was identified as M. incognita. The results showed that all treatments had a significant difference compared to the control and were able to reduce nematode infection indices. The best treatment in nematode control was chicken manure which decreased the number of galls, the number of egg masses, the number of larvae and eggs per gram of root, the number of second stage juveniles per hundred grams of soil and the reproduction factor by 86.7%, 76.7%, 89.8%, 90.3% and 91%, respectively, compared to the control. The results revealed that vermicompost was the least effective treatment which reduced the number of galls and egg masses per root system, the number of larvae and eggs per gram of root, the number of second stage juveniles per hundred grams of soil, and the reproduction factor by 78.8%, 36%, 65.4%, 64.7% and 65.1%, respectively, compared to the control. The results suggest that the use of organic amendments as an alternative to chemical nematicides can be effective in reducing nematode populations in kiwi orchards. In addition, the use of organic amendments may improve soil fertility and plant growth, which can have a positive impact on overall crop yield and quality.
 
Conclusion
Based on the findings of this study, all treatments were successful in reducing nematode indices. However, comparisons of the treatments showed that chicken manure had the most significant effect in reducing the indices compared to other treatments. Following chicken manure, vermiwash and liquid chicken manure treatments were the next most effective. Additionally, all treatments successfully increased production. These results may be attributed to effective nematode control and improved plant nutrition. Application of chicken manure, vermicompost, and vegetable waste as organic amendments have been reported to have positive effects on soil health and plant growth, as they improve soil fertility and increase the population of beneficial soil microorganisms. In this study, these organic amendments were effective in reducing nematode infection indicators, such as the number of galls, egg masses, and larvae per gram of root, as well as the reproduction factor. It's important to conduct further research to confirm the effectiveness of these treatments in different environmental conditions and on different crops. It's also important to consider the potential for nutrient leaching and other environmental impacts associated with the use of organic amendments.
 



 
 



 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Actinidia deliciosa
  • Crop loss
  • Soil amendments

©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

مراجع

  1. Ahmadi, K., Ebadzadeh, H.R., Hatami, F., Abdeshah, H., & Kazemian, A. (2023). Statistics of agricultural products of 2021-2022 crop year. Volume One of Crops, Ministry of Jihad Agriculture. (In Persian)
  2. Amulu, L.U., & Adekunle, O.K. (2015). Comparative effects of poultry manure, cow dung, and carbofuran on yield of Meloidogyne incognita-infested okra. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 17(2), 495-504.
  3. Antonious, G.F., Bomford, M., & Vincelli, P. (2009). Screening Brassica species for glucosinolate content. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 44(3), 311-316.
  4. Avato, P., D'Addabbo, T., Leonetti, P., & Argentieri, M.P. (2013). Nematicidal potential of Brassicaceae. Phytochemistry Reviews, 12(4), 791-802. https://doi.org/1080/03601230902728476
  5. Boydston, R.A., & Vaughn, S.F. (2002). Alternative weed management systems control weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technology, 16(1), 23–28.
  6. Charles, K., Agathar, K., Ronald, M., Cosmas, P., Ignitius, M., & Blessing, M. (2015). Nematicidal effects of brassica formulation against root knot nematodes (Meloidogyne javanica) in tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum). Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology, 27(2), 109-114.
  7. Chitwood, D.J. (2002). Phytochemical based strategies for nematode control. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 40, 221-249. https://doi.org/1146/annurev.phyto.40.032602.130045
  8. Ebrahimi, M., Mousavi, A., Souri, M.K., & Sahebani, N. (2021). Can vermicompost and biochar control Meloidogyne javanica on eggplant? Nematology, 23(9), 1053-1064.
  9. Edwards, C.A., & Fletcher, K.E. (1988). Interactions between earthworms and microorganisms in organic matter breakdown. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 24(1-3), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(88)90069-2
  10. El-Sherbiny, A.A., & Awd Allah, S.F.A. (2014). Management of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants by pre-planting soil biofumigation with harvesting residues of some winter crops and waste residues of oyster mushroom cultivation under field conditions. Egyptian Journal of Agronematology, 13(1), 189-202. https://doi.org/21608/ejaj.2014.63695
  11. Fenwick, D.W. (1940). Methods for recovery and counting of Heterodera schachtii from soil. Journal of Helminthology, 18(4), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X00031485
  12. Gad, S.B., Aljboori, Q.H.A., Abido, W.A.E., Abo-El-Kheer, E.A.M., & Saadoon, S.M. (2021). Efficacy of four cruciferous germinated grinded seed on adjusting Meloidogyne incognita infecting soybean plants. In 2nd Virtual International Scintific Agrticultural Conference. (Vol. 735). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/735/1/012030
  13. Heidari, F., & Oila, M. (2017). Studying the separate and integrated application of fungus, Trichoderma harzianum i2375 and Vermicompost in control of root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne javanica, on tomato. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Protection, 6(3), 11-22. (In Persian with English abstract)
  14. Helalat, N., Nasresfahani, M., & Olia, M. (2017). The effect of organic fertilizers on population dynamics of sugar beet cyst nematode, Heterodera schachtii. Journal of Plant Protection, 31(3), 475-487. (In Persian with English abstract)
  15. Hussey, R.S., & Barker, K.R. (1973). A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne including a new technique, Plant Disease Reporter, 57, 1025-1028.
  16. Jepson, S.B. (1987). Identification of Root-Knot nematodes. Cambrian news Ltd.
  17. Karavina, C., Komota, A., Mandumbu, K., Parwada, C., Mugwati, I., & Masamha, B. (2015). Nematicidal effects of Brassica formulations against root knot nematodes (Meloidogyne javanica) in tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum). Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology, 27(02), 109-114.
  18. Khan, S.A., Javed, N., Khan, M.A., Kamran, M., & Atif, H.M., (2008). Management of root knot 916 nematode Meloidogyne incognita through the use of plant extracts. Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology, 20, 214-217.
  19. Khazai pol, Y.Q. (2003). Biology of flowering and pollination in kiwifruit. Publication of agricultural education.
  20. López-Pérez, J.A., Roubtsova, T., García, M.D.C., & Ploeg, A. (2010). The potential of five winter-grown crops to reduce root-knot nematode damage and increase yield of tomato. Society of Nematologists, 42(2), 120-127.
  21. López-Pérez, J.A., Roubtsova, T., & Ploeg, A. (2005). Effect of three plant residues and chicken manure used as biofumigants at three temperatures on Meloidogyne incognita infestation of tomato in greenhouse experiments. Journal of Nematology, 37(4), 489–494.
  22. Manzanilla-López, R., Evans, K., & Bridge, J. (2004). Plant diseases caused by nematodes. Nematology Advances and Perspectives, 2, 637–716.
  23. Michailides, T.J., & Elmer, P.A.G. (2000). Botrytis gray mold of kiwifruit caused by Botrytis cinerea in the United States and New Zeland. Plant Disease, 84(3), 208–223.
  24. Nahar, M.S., Grewal, P.S., Miller, S.A., Stinner, D., Stinner, B.R., Kleinhenz, M.D., Wszelaki, A., & Doohan, D. (2006). Differential effects of raw and composted manure on nematode community and its indicative value for soil microbial, physical and chemical properties. Applied Soil Ecology, 34, 140-151.
  25. Oka, Y., Koltai, H., Bar-Eyal, M., Mor, M., Sharon, E., Chet, I., & Spiegel, Y. (2000) New strategies for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes. Pest Management Science, 56, 983–988.
  26. Oka,Y. (2010) Mechanisms of nematode suppression by organic soil amendments. Applied Soil Ecology, 44(2), 101-115.
  27. Oostenbrink, M. (1966). Major characteristics of the relation between nematodes and plants. Mededelingen/Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen, Veenman, Wageningen, pp. 46.
  28. Osman, H.A., Ameen, H.H., Mohamed, M., El-Mohamedy, R., & Elkelany, U.S. (2018). Field control of Meloidogyne incognita and root rot disease infecting eggplant using nematicide, fertilizers, and microbial agents. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 28(40). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-018-0044-1
  29. Ribero, C.F., Miizobutsi, E.H., Silva, D.G., Pereira, J.C.R., & Zambolim, L. (1998). Control of Meloidognye javanica on lettuce with organic amendments. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 23, 42–44.
  30. Rodriguez-Kabana, R. (1986). Organic and inorganic nitrogen amendments to soil as nematode suppressants. Journal of Nematology, 18, 129-135.
  31. Rostami, M.,& Olia, M. (2016). Control of pathogenicity root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) by earthworm eisenia feoetida-based products in greenhouse. Iranian Plant Protection Research, 30(1), 42-53. (In Persian with English abstract)
  32. Sasser, J.N., & Carter, C.C. (1985). Overview of the International Meloidogyne Project 1975-1984. Pp: 19-24. In: Sasser, J. N. and Carter, C. C. (Eds.), An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne. Volume 1: Biology and control. Raleigh: North Carolina State University Graphics.
  33. Selvaraj, A. (2011). Effect of vermicompost tea on the growth and yield of tomato plants and suppression of root knot nematode in the soil. Information website: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/49t6942q
  34. Sunita Devi, T.H., & Debanand, D.A.S. (2016). Effect of organic amendments on root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) in cucumber. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems, 22(2), 110-114.
  35. Taylor, D.P., & Netscher, C. (1974). An improved technique for preparing perennial pattern of Meloidogyne, Nematologica, 20, 268-270.
  36. Tomati, U., Grappelli, A., & Galli, E. (1988). The hormone like effect of earthworm casts on plant growth. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 5, 288-294.
  37. Whitehead, A.G., & Hemming. J.R., (1965). A comparison of some quantitative methode of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil. Annal Applied Biology, 55, 25-38.
  38. Yasir, M., Aslam, Z., Kim, S.W., Lee, S.W., Jeon, C.O., & Chung, Y.R. (2009). Bacterial community composition and chitinase gene diversity of vermicompost with antifungal activity. Bioresource Technology, 100, 4396–4403.
  39. Zasada, I.A., & Ferris, H. (2004). Nematode suppression with brassicaceous amendments: application based upon glucosinolate profiles. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 1017-1024.
  40. Zuhair, R., Thabet, Y., Moustafa, A., Mustafa, N.S.A., El-Dahshouri, M.F., Zhang, L., & Ageba, M.F. (2022). Efficacy of amended vermicompost for bio-control of root knot nematode (RKN) Meloidogyne incognita infesting tomato in Egypt. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 27, 102397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102397
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار