بررسی اثر آفت‌کش‌های گیاهی پالیزین و شیمیایی فن‌والریت روی سرخرطومی برگ یونجه Hypera postica (Col.: Curculionidae) و دشمن طبیعی آن Chrysoperla carnea (Neu.: Chrysopidae)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

چکیده

در این تحقیق اثر دو آفت­کش گیاهی پالیزین و شیمیایی فن­والریت روی حشرات کامل سرخرطومی برگ یونجه Hypera postica (Gyllenhal)  و تخم و لاروهای سن اول بالتوری سبزChrysoperla carnea (Stephens)  در شرایط آزمایشگاهی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. همچنین آزمایشی در شرایط مزرعه­ای با سه تیمار شامل پالیزین 2500 پی­پی­ام، فن والریت 1000 پی­پی­ام، شاهد (آّب پاشی) و پنج تکرار در قالب طرح بلوک کامل تصادفی انجام گرفت. تعداد حشرات کامل و لاروهای سرخرطومی برگ یونجه و لاروهای بالتوری سبز در نوبت­های یک روز قبل و سه، هفت، چهارده و بیست­و­یک روز بعد از تیمار شمارش شدند. در شرایط آزمایشگاهی، میزان LC50 ترکیبات ذکر شده روی حشرات کامل H. postica با گذشت 24 ساعت از زمان تیمار به­ترتیب 72/601 و 87/321 پی­پی­ام برآورد شد. حشره­کش فن­والریت سمیت بالاتری نسبت به آفت­کش پالیزین برای بالتوری سبز داشت. میزانLC50  حشره­کش فن­والریت روی تخم و لارو سن اول C. carnea به­ترتیب 02/563 و 46/178 پی­پی­ام و میزان LC50 آفت­کش پالیزین به­ترتیب 1664 و 1633 پی­پی­ام برآورد شد. در شرایط مزرعه­ای، آفت­کش پالیزین دوام اثر طولانی­تری روی سرخرطومی برگ یونجه داشت. بر اساس معیارهای IOBC، آفت­کش پالیزین در تمامی زمان­های نمونه­برداری در گروه سموم با خطر کم و حشره­کش فن­والریت در گروه سموم خطرناک برای بالتوری سبز C. carnea دسته­بندی شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Survey Effect of Palizin and Fenvalerate on the Alfalfa Weevil Hyperapostica (Col.: Curculionidae) and Its Natural Enemies Chrysoperlacarnea (Neu.:Chrysopidae)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdi Kabiri Raeis Abad
  • Elham Zarei
Mohaghegh Ardabili
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Alfalfa (Medicagosativa L.) is a high-quality forage crop widely grown throughout the world. This plant is attacked by a wide range of pests.Alfalfa weevil, Hyperapostica(Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera:Curculionidae), is a pest of concern in alfalfa on the globe. This introduced pest is most problematic in the early season, causing defoliation and reduced yield and quality. Both adults and larvae feed on alfalfa, but the larvae cause the majority of the damage to terminals, foliage, and new crown shoots. This pest has many natural enemies. Among the beneficial insects, the green lacewing, Chrysoperlacarnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), has received special attention since its larvae are important natural enemies of alfalfa weevil. The control of H. postica was done by chemical pesticides .There is now overwhelming evidence that some of these chemicals do pose a potential risk to humans and other life forms and unwanted side effects to the environment. Palizin (Coconut soap) is a natural compound based coconut extract. In the current research work, the effect of this compound on the adult of H. postica and egg and 1st instars larvae of C. carnea was investigated under laboratory and field conditions.
Rearing of insects

postica: H. postica larvae were collected from alfalfa fields in Miandoab using sweep nets in July 2016 and taken to the laboratory. Larvae were placed in plastic dishes (5 × 10 × 20 cm), fed by alfalfa foliage, and held at 25 ± 2 °C, 75±5% RH to complete their growth and convert to adults. The adults were used for all tests.
carnea: C. carnea adults were collected from alfalfa field at the Miandoab region, taken to the laboratory for identification of species and reared in the laboratory. Clear plastic cylinder containers (with 15 cm diameter × 25 cm height), which were covered with a mesh cloth were used for rearing. A thin layer of food source (mixture of yeast 50%, water 25% and honey 25%) was smeared to a plastic tape which was inserted into the plastic container. Water was provided for the adults through a wet sponge placed on the mesh cloth. To harvest the eggs, the adults were transferred to fresh containers every day. The eggs were laid on a colored paper which was attached to the interior wall of the cage. The eggs hatched after 3 days and the first larvae were used for bioassay.

Bioassay: First, primary experiments were performed to determine the minimum and maximum concentrations. Afterward, seven concentrations and also control were considered. Concentrations used for Palizin were 400, 543, 737, 1000, 1357, 1842 and 2500 ppm and for Fenvalerate were 200, 265, 353, 468, 622, 827 and 1200 ppm. Adult were kept at 4 °C to be inactive. Then, 15 adults were release on the petri plate (with 9cm diameter and 1.5 cm height). Using spray potter tower, 500 microliter of each concentration was sprayed on the petri and the dishes were placed in a growth incubator at 25±2˚C, 65±5% RH. To evaluate the recommended concentrations (2500 ppm Palizin and 1000 ppm Fenvalerate), an experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block with three treatments and five replications under field conditions. The number of H. postica (adults and larvae) and C. carnea (larvae) was counted day before and 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after treatment.
Statistical analyses: The mortality results were analyzed using SPSS data processing software. Significant differences among the groups were determined using the unpaired Duncan-test in 5 % level of significance.The percentage of population reduction in the treatments was corrected in relation to the control (water) by Henderson and Tilton’s formula under field condition.
Results and Discussion: Insecticides may be a good option if other options have not sufficiently controlled alfalfa weevil. Several com­mercially available products are labeled for control of alfalfa weevil. Although effective, their repeated usagehas disrupted natural biological control systems and led to resurgence of this pest, resulted in the development of resistance and had undesirable effects on no target organisms. In order to prevent resistance, effective chemical control of the pest requires new insecticides with novel modes of action. In laboratory condition, the LC50 values of Palizin and Fenvalerate on H. postica were 601.72 and 321.87 ppm 24 h after treatment, respectively. Toxicity of Fenvalerate for egg and 1st instars larvae of C. carnea was higher than Palizin. The LC50 values of this insecticide were 563.02 and 178.46 ppm and the LC50 values of Palizin were 1664 and 1663 ppm. The results of field trial showed that Palizinhas a longer persistency effect. According to IOBC standards, Palizin and Fenvalerate were categorized as slightly toxic and very toxic to C. carnea, respectively.
Conclusions: The plant pesticide used in this research caused the high mortality on the adults of H. posticawith proper persistency. In addition, its toxicity is less than Fenvalerate to C. Carnea and can be applied as an effective alternative to chemical insecticides in alfalfa fields. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Hypera postica
  • Chrysoperla carnea
  • Palizin
  • Fenvalerate
1- Abbott W.S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18: 265-267.
2- Aggarwal N., and Brar D.S. 2005. Effects of different neem preparations in comparison to synthetic insecticides on the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia sophia (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and the predator Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on cotton under laboratory conditions. Journal of Pest Sciences, 79: 201- 207.
3- Asadi Eeidvand M.R., Gol Mohamadi Gh., and Ghajariyeh H. 2015. Lethal and sublethal effects of four insecticides on egg and first larvae green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea in laboratory conditions. Iranian Journal of Plant Protection, 46(2): 331-338. (in Persian with English abstract).
4- Blodgett S.L., and Lenssen A.W. 2004. Distribution of alfalfa weevil (Coeloptera: Curculionidae) larvae among post cutting locations. Journal of Economic Entomology, 97: 1319-1322.
5- Bueno A.F., and Freitas S. 2004. Effect of the insecticides abamectin and lufenuron on eggs and larvae of Chrysoperla externa under laboratory conditions. BioControl, 49: 277-283.
6- Croft B.A. 1990. Arthropod biological control agents and pesticides. New York, Wiley, 723 p.
7- Danay-Tous A.H., Farazmand H., Oliaei-Torshiz A., and Sirjani M. 2014. Effect of red pepper and garlic extract on pistachio psylla nymph, Agonoscena pistaciae, in field conditions. Biocontrol in Plant Protection, 1(2): 91-99. (in Persian with English abstract).
8- Desneux N., Decourtye A., and Delpuech J.M. 2007. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 52: 81-106.
9-Diaz-Arandaz L.M., and Monserrat, V.J. 1995. Aphidophagous predator diagnosis: key to genera of European chrysopid larvae (Neuro.: Chrysopidae). Entomophaga, 40(2):169-181.
10- El-Wakeil N., Gaafar N., Sallam A., and Volkmar C.H. 2013. Side effects of insecticides on natural enemies and possibility of their integration in plant protection strategies. Insecticides - Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies. Chapter 1. 54 pp.
11- Fick G.W. 1976. Alfalfa weevil effects on regrowth of alfalfa. Agronomy Journal, 68: 809–812.
12- Grafton-Cardwell E.E., and Hoy M.A. 1985. Intraspecific variability in response to pesticides in the common green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Hilgardia, 53: 1–31.
13- Hassan S.A., Bigler F., Bogenschutz H., Boller E., Brun J., Calis J.N.M., Coremans-Pelseneer J., Duso C., Grove A., Heimbach U., Helyer N., Hokkanen H., Lewis G.B., Mansour F., Moreth L., Polgar L., Samsøe- Petersen L., Sauphanor B., Stäubli A., Sterk G., Vainio A., Vander Veire M., Viggiani G., and Vogt H. 1994. Results of the sixth joint pesticide testing programme of the IOBC/WPRS-working group Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms. Entomophaga, 39: 107–119.
14- Heidari H.1996. The Key of Chrysopa and Suarius (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae) species collected from Iran. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran, 9(1,2): 47-54.
15- Henderson C.F., and Tilton E.W. 1955. Tests with acaricides against the brown wheat mite. Journal of Economic Entomology, 48: 157–161.
16- Kabiri Raeis Abad M., and Amiri-Beheshli B. 2012. Toxicty of Palizin, Mospilan and Consult on Agonoscena pisticae Burckarat and Lanuter (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), Oenopia conglobate L. (Coleopteran: Coccinellidae) and Psyllaephaus pistaciae Frriiere (Hym.: Encyrtidae). Academic Journal of Entomology, 5: 99-107.
17- Ketabi L., Jalalaizand A., and Bagheri M.R. 2014. A study about toxicity of some herbal insecticides on cotton aphid (Aphis Gossypii) and its natural enemy (Aphidius colemani) in laboratory and greenhouse. Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(6): 2855-2858.
18- Khanjani M. 2012. Field Crop Pests in Iran (Insects and Mites). 6th ed. Hamedan, Iran: Bu-Ali Sina University Publication. (in Persian).
19- Khanjani M., and Pourmirza A.A. 2004. A comparison of various control methods of alfalfa weevil, Hyperapostica (Col:Curculionidae) in Hamadan. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran. 1:67-81. (in Persian with English abstract).
20- Kingsley P.C., Bryan M.D., Day W.H., Burger T.L., Dysart R.J., and Schwalbe C.P. 1993. Alfalfa weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) biological control: spreading the benefits. Environmental Entomology, 22: 1234–1250.
21- Lopez O., Fernandez-Bolanos J.G., and Gil M.V. 2005. New trends in pest control: the search for greener insecticides. Green Chemistry Journal, 7: 431-442.
22- Medina P., Budia F., Smagghe G., and Viňuela E. 2001. Activity of spinosad, diflubenzuron and azadirachtin on eggs and pupae of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) under laboratory conditions. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 11:597–610.
23- Medina M.P., Budia F., Tirry L., Smagghe G., and Viñuela E. 2003. Effects of three modern insecticides, pyriproxyfen, spinosad and tebufenozide, on survival and reproduction of Chrysoperla carnea adults. Annals of Applied Biology, 142:55-61.
24- Moradi Vajargah M., Rafiee-Dastjerdi H., Golizadeh A., Hassanpour M., and Naseri B. 2013. Laboratory toxicity and field efficacy of lufenuron, dinotefuran and thiamethoxam against Hypera postica (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Munis Entomology and Zoology, 8 (1): 448-457.
25- Nasreen A., Ashfaq M., Mustafa G.H., and Rasool Khan R. 2007. Mortality rate of five commercial insecticides on Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Chrysopidae: Neuroptera). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science, 44 (2): 266-271.
26- New T.R., 1992. The lacewings (Insecta, Neuroptera) of Tasmania. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania. 126: 29-45.
27- Pitts-Singer T.L. 2008. Bees in Agricultural Ecosystems, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. p. 105–123.
28- Purhematy A., Ahmadi K., and Moshrefi M. 2010. Toxicity of thiacloprid and fenvalerate on the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae, and biosafety against its parasitoid, Lysiphlebus fabarum. Journal of Biopesticides, 6 (2): 207-2010.
29- Robertson J.L., Russell R.M., Preisler H.K., and Savin N.E. 2007. Bioassays with arthropods. Boca Raton, CRC Press. P. 199.
30- Sabahi Q., Rasekh A., and Michaud J.P. 2010. Toxicity of three insecticides to Lysiphlebus fabarum, a parasitoid of the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae. Journal of Insect Science, 11: 1-8.
31- Saber M., Hejazi M.J., Kamali K., and Moharramipour S. 2005. Lethal and sublethal effects of fenitrothion and deltamethrin residues on the egg parasitoid Trissolcus grandis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 98: 35-40.
32- Saeedi K. 2007. Preliminary studies on natural enemies of the alfalfa weevil in Yasouj. Journal of Research in Agricultural Science, 3(1): 1-13. (in Persian with English abstract).
33- Schuster D.J., and Stansly P.A. 2000. Response of two lacewing species to biorational and broad-spectrum insecticides. Phytoparasitica, 28:1–8.
34- Shrestha G., Enkegaard A., and Steenberg T. 2015. Laboratory and semi-field evaluation of Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) against the lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Biological Control, 85: 37–45.
35- Ugine T.A., Wraight S.P., and Sanderson J.P. 2007. A tritrophic effect of host plant on susceptibility of western flower thrips to the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 96 (2): 162–172.
36- Windbiel R., Karey D., Elham, K.G., and Godfrey L. 2005. Current status of biological control of alfalfa weevils in California. In: Proceedings, California alfalfa Visalia, CA, UC Cooperative Extension, Agronomy Research and Extension Center, Plant Science Department, University of California, Davis.p. 12-32.
37- Wu S., Reddy G.V.P., and Jaronski S.T. 2014. Advances in microbial insect control in horticultural ecosystems, in: D. Nandawani (Ed.), Sustainable Horticultural Systems, Sustainable Development and Biodiversity 2, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, p. 223–252.
38- Yardim E.N., Ozgen I., and Kulaz H. 2001. Effects of neem-based and chemical insecticides on some arthropods in alfalfa. Meded Rijksuniv Gent. Fak.Landbouwkd Toegep. Biol. Wet, 66: 519–524.
39- Zeb Khan S., Ullah F., Khan S., Khan M.A., and Khan M.A. 2015. Residual effect of insecticides against different stages of green lacewing, Chrysoperla Carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 3 (4): 114-119.
CAPTCHA Image