معرفی حشره‌کش دیفلوبنزورون (دیمیلین® SC48%) برای کنترل کرم سیب

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی زنجان

2 سازمان تحقیفات آموزش و ترویج کشاوری

3 مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی

4 مؤسسه تحقیقات گیاه‌پزشکی کشور

چکیده

کرم سیب Cydia pomonella L.آفت کلیدی سیب در ایران است. به علت ناکارآمدی سایر روش‌های کنترلی، استفاده از حشره‌کش ها، اولین گزینه، عمومی‌ترین و موفق‌ترین روش کنترل این آفت است. در تحقیق حاضر تأثیر حشره‌کش دیفلوبنزورون (دیمیلین(SC48% ® به همراه حشره‌کش‌های فوزالون )زولون(SE 35% ® و تیاکلوپرید (کالیپسو® 48% SC) و شاهد در 4 تکرار و در سه منطقه ارومیه، زنجان و بجنورد به مدت یک سال، در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج به دست آمده نشان داد که تیمار دیمیلین با میانگین درصد آلودگی 23/0± 02/4 درصد، 4/1±26/7 و 42/0±06/2 درصد به ترتیب در ارومیه، زنجان و بجنورد دارای کمترین و تیمار شاهد با میانگین 94/4±37/57، 03/3±21/45 و 08/3±12/57 درصد دارای بالاترین میانگین درصد آلودگی بود. تیمار کالیپسو با میانگین درصد آلودگی 43/0±02/1 و 44/0 ±00/3 به ترتیب در ارومیه و زنجان و تیمار زولون با میانگین درصد آلودگی 29/0± 65/3 در ارومیه در رده مشابه آماری با دیمیلین قرار گرفتند. جمع‌بندی نتایج نشان می‌دهد که ترکیب دیمیلین را می‌توان، در صورت ضرورت جانشین ترکیبات رایج نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Introduction of Diflubenzoron (Dimilin SC 48% ®) against codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. (Lep: Tortricidae)

نویسندگان [English]

  • M. Taghaddosi 1
  • Mohammad Rahim Moeini 1
  • Gh.A. Akbarzadeh Shokat 2
  • Hashem Kamali 3
  • Raoof Koliaei 4
1 Zanjan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Zanjan, Iran
2 Education Research and Natural Resources Center in West Azerbaijan
3 Khorasane Razavi, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center Mashad, Iran
4 Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. is the key pest of apple in Iran. Due to inefficiency of other control measures, insecticide application has been the first option, most common and successful management method so far. In this research, effect of Diflubenzoron (Dimilin® SC48) was compared with Phosalone (Zolone SE 35) and Thiaclopride(kalipso® SC480) in three regions of Zanjan, Urmia and Bojnord using a layout of RCBD with 4 replications for one growing season. Results showed that treatment of Dimilin.with 4.02±0.23, 7.26±1.4, and 2.6±0.42 percent of infection at Urmia, Zanjan and Bojnord recorded the least percent of infection respectively whereas treatment of control with 57.37±4.94, 45.21±3.3 and 57.12±3.08 percent of infection at the same experimental points recorded the highest percent. Treatment of Kalipso with 1.02±0.43 and 3.00±0.44 percent of infection at Urmia and Zanjan and treatment of Zolon at Urmia with 3.65±0.29 registered the same statistical group as the Dimilin. It could be concluded that current insecticides may be replaced by Dimilin per need.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Key words: Phozalone
  • Thiaclopride
  • Chemical contro
  • Codling Moth
1- Alston D. G., and Lindstorm T. 2003. Codling moth control in apple. Proceeding of the 77th Annual western orchard Pest & Diseases Management Conference, Portland, Washington. 15-17, Portland Washinton. U. S. A. p. 60. http://entomology.tfrec.wsu.edu/wopdmc/2003PDFs/Rep03%20Chemical_Alston-2.pdf(18 March 2015).
2- Anderson D. W., and Elliott R. H. 1982. Efficacy of Diflubenzuron against codling moth, Laspyeresia pomonelle (Lep: Oleothreutidae), and impact on orchrd mites. The Canadian Entomologist,114: 733-73
3- Anonymus. 2015. Dimilin 25W: Insect Growth Regulator, Downloaded from www. Chemtura.com.
4- Ascher K. R. S., Nemny N.E., and Ishaaya I. 1980. The toxic effect of diflubenzuron on Spodoptera littoralis eggs and on their respiration. Pestic. Sci. 11: 90-94.
5- Barens B. N. O. 1991. Banded fruit weevil in decidiuous fruit orchards of the South Western Cape; Historical review and background. Stellenbosch: Navorsings institute vir vrugte en vrugtetgnologie, Fruit and fruit technology research institute, 3pp
6- Barnes M.M., and Moffitt H.R. 1963. Resistance to D.D.T in the adult codling moth and reference curves for guthion and carbaryl. Journal of Economic Entomology. 56: 722-725.
7- Beers E. H., and Brunner J.F. 1991. Washington state apple and pear pesticide use survey, 1989-1990. Report to USDA- NAPIAP,79 pp.
8- Booth, S. R, and Riedl H. 1996. Diflubenzuron-Based Management of the Pear Pest Complex in Commercial Orchards of the Hood River Valley in Oregon, Journal of Economic Entomology, 89(3): 621-630.
9- Bowers W.C., Ochta T., Cleere G. S., and Marsella P. A. 1976. Discovery of insect anti-juvenil hormone in plants, Sciences, 193(4253): 542-547.
10- Cranham J. E. 1978, Control of of the codling moth with diflubnenzur on In: The use of integrated control and the sterile insect technique for control of codling moth. FAO/IAEA Res. Coor. Mtg. Mitt. Biol. Bundesanst. Land. Forstwirtsch (Berlin-Dahlem) 180:108-110
11- Croft B. A., and Riedl H. W. 1991. Chemical control and resistance to pesticides of the codling moth. In: Van L. P. S. der Geest and der Geest and Evenhuis, J. J. (Editors): Tortricid pests: Their biology, Natural enemies and control, Elsevier, amsterdam pp, 371-387.
12- Cutwright C.R. 1954. A codling moth population resistant to D.D.T Journal of Economic Entomology.47: 189- 190.
13- Dastghaib Beheshti N. 1980. Suitable timing of chemical control against codling moth in Isfahan with sex pheromone traps, Applied Entomology and Phytopathology, 48 (1): 97-101. (In Persian with English summary).
14- Davatchi A., and Esmaeili M. 1965. Experiment of five insecticide formulations for codling moth control. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology, (23): 14-32. (In Persian with English summary).
15- Elliot R.H., and D.W. Anderson. 1982. Factors influencing the activity of diflubenzuron against the codling moth, Laspyresia pomonella L., (Lep.: Olethreutidae), The Canadian Entomologist, 114: 259-268.
16- Granett J., and Weseloh R. M. 1975. Dimilin Toxicity to the Gypsy Moth Larval Parasitoid, Apanteles melanoscelus, Journal of Economic Entomology, 68(5): 577-580.
17- Granger K. R., Brunneer J. F., and Doerr M. D. 2003. Managing codling moth with new insecticides: Assail, Interpid and Success., Proceeding of the 77th Annual Western orchard pest& Diseases Management Conference, January 15-17, Portland, Washington., U.S.A., p. 61.
18- Hoying S. A., and Riedl H. 1980, Susceptibility of the Codling Moth to Diflubenzuron, :1980 , Journal of Economic Entomology, 73(4):556-560.
19- Javadzadeh M., and Pour Hajy A. 2000. An investigation on efficacy of some new insecticides in control of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L). Final Report of Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, No. 18351, 15p. (In Persian with English summary).
20- Kazemi M.H. 1981. Efficiency determination of Imidan against codling moth, Applied Entomology and Phytopathology .48(2): 155-165. (In Persian with English summary).
21- Koliaeii R, Akbarzadeh Shoukat Q., and Koroush Nezhad E. 2005. A study on the effificacy of some new pesticides against codling moth. Final Report of Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, No. 84/979, 22 p. (In Persian with English summary).
22- Meschi M. 2007. Index of registered pesticides in Iran. Iranian Organization of Plant Protection, 272 pp. (In Persian).
23- Olomi Sadeghi H., and Esmaeili M. 1980, An investigation on flight trend ofcodling moth, Laspyeresia pomonella (L.) for optimum timing of control, Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science,Vol. 3, pp: 83-112. (In Persian).
24- Rajabi Gh. 1986. Insects attacking of rosaceous fruit trees in Iran, (Second volum: moth), Iranian Research Institute of plant protection Tehran, 209 p. (In Persian).
25- Ridel H., and. Hoying S. A. 1980. Impact of fenvalerate and diflubenzuron on target and nontarget arthropod species on Barlett pears in northern California. Journal of Economic Entomology, 73:117-122.
26- Salma H. S., Motagally Z. A., and Skatulla U. 1976. On the mode of action of Dimilin as a moulting inhibitor in some Lepidopterous insects. Z. ang.Ent. 80:396- 407.
27- Sample B. E., Butler L., and Whitmore R. C. 1993. Effects of an operational application of Dimilin on non- target insects. The Canadian Entomologist, 125(2):
28- Sheikhi Garajan A., Najafi H., Abbasi S., Saberfar F., and Rashid M. 2012. Textbook of pesticides used in Iran, 2012, Tehran, Paitakht publication, 384 pp. (In Persian).
29- Smagghe G., Bylemans D., Medina P., Budia F., Avilia J., and Vinuela. 2004. Tebufenozide distorted codling moth larval growth and reproduction, and controlled field populations . Ann. appl.Biol. 145: 291- 298.
30- Soltani N., and Mazouni N. 1992. Diflubenzuron and oogenosis in the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L), Pestic. Sci. 34: 257-261.
31- Taft H. M., and. Hopkins A. R. 1975. Boll weevils. field population controlled by sterilizing emerging overwintered females with a TH-6040 sprayable bait. Journal of Economic Entomology, 68: 551-554.
32- Talebi Jahromi Kh. 2006. Toxicology of Pesticides, Tehran University Press, 429 p. (In Persian).
33- Thwaite G. G. W., and Nicol H. 1999. Field evaluation of the effects of insect growth regulator tebufenizide on entomophagous arthropods and pests of apples. Austuralian Journal of Entomology, 38 (2): 135-140.
34- Valera L. G., Welter S. C., Jones V. P., Brunner J. F., and Riedl H. 1993. Monitoring and characterization of insecticide resistance in codling moth (Lep :Torticidae) in four western states. Journal of Economic Entomology, 86(1): 1-10.
35- Van Laecke K., and Degheele D. 1991 Synergism of Diflubenzorun and Teflubenzuron in Larvae of Beet Armyworm (Lep: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 84, (3): 785-789.
36- Westigard P. H. 1979. Codling Moth: Control on Pears with Diflubenzuron and Effects on Nontarget Pest and Beneficial Species, Journal of Economic Entomology, 72: 552-554.
37- Willrich M. M., and Boethel D. J. 2001. Effects of Diflubenzuron on Pseudoplusia includens and its parasitoid Copidosoma floridanum, Biological Control , Augst: 794-797.
CAPTCHA Image