واکنش ژنوتیپ‌های آفتابگردان به نژادهای زنگ Puccinia helianthi در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 موسسۀ تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیۀ نهال و بذر

2 موسسأ تحقیقات برنج کشور

3 موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر

چکیده

بیماری زنگ آفتابگردان یکی از مهم‌‌ترین عوامل تهدید کنندۀ این گیاه در نواحی مهم کشت در ایران بوده و منابع مقاومت به آن در ژرم پلاسم میزبان دست یافتنی می‌باشد. طی سال 1389 نمونه‌‌های برگ آفتابگردان آلوده به بیماری زنگ از استان‌های گلستان و آذر‌بایجان غربی جمع‌آوری شده و در مجموع هشت جدایه از این مناطق برای شناسایی نژادهای فیزیولوژیک روی رقم حساس رکورد مایه‌زنی گردیدند. سپس با روش تک پوستول کردن، عمل خالص‌سازی صورت گرفت. جدایه‌های قارچ پس از تولید انبوه در اتاقک‌های مجزای گلخانه بر روی سری نه تایی ارقام افتراقی آفتابگردان مایه‌زنی گردیدند. نتایج به دست آمده حاکی از تفاوت فیزیولوژیک جدایه‌های این دو منطقه و وجود دو نژاد مستقل می‌باشند. با توجه به تشابهات بیماری‌زایی روی لاین‌های افتراقی مشترک، نژادهای شمارۀ 302 و 300 به ترتیب برای مناطق گلیداغ (گلستان) و خوی در استان آذربایجان غربی معرفی می‌شوند. بررسی‌های مقاومت ژرم پلاسم آفتابگردان به بیماری زنگ نیز در شرایط کنترل شدۀ گلخانه صورت پذیرفت. این آزمایش‌ها با کاربرد روش مایه‌زنی گردپاشی با پودر تالک و استفاده از نژادهای شناسایی شده به اجرا در آمدند. نتایج حاصل نشان داد که هیبرید قاسم و لاین نگهدارندۀ باروری آن به نژاد 302 و هیبرید برزگر و لاین مربوطۀ آن به هر دو نژاد زنگ مقاوم هستند. از میان شش عدد تک بوته‌های مقاوم رقم گابور تنها ژنوتیپ G-445 در مقابل هر دو نژاد بیمارگر مقاومت داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Reaction of Sunflower Genotypes against Physiological Races of Rust Disease Caused by Puccinia helianthi in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Siamak Rahmanpour Ozan 1
  • Alireza Nabipour 2
  • Abolghasem Khodabandeh 3
1 Seed and Plant Improvement Research Institute
2 Rice Research Institute of Iran
3 Seed and Plant Improvement Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Sunflower rust is one of the most important diseases of the host in main cropping areas of Iran and resistance sources among the plant germplasm are accessible. Sunflower rust disease caused by Puccinia helianthi was reported first time at 1822 on collected samples from Eastern south areas of United States. It is considered as an important disease for sunflower cropping areas of South and North America, Argentina, Africa, India, China, and Australia and has been reported on the host worldwide. Incidence and severity of the disease on commercial hybrids had been increased up to early 1990s in Canada. Between 1988-89, the incidence on crop was reported up to 60 percent; whilst highly infected fields were appeared at the end of crop season. Puccinia helianthi has a worldwide distribution on sunflower and all species of Helianthus. There are also four other species which cause rust on cultivated and wild sunflowers. P. enceliae and P. masalis have been reported on wild sunflower and composites from southwest of United States. P. xanthi with a worldwide distribution on Xanthium Spp from Australia and Coleosporium helianthi from eastern areas of U.S. have been reported. Investigations reported some areas of Mazandaran and Golestan provinces showing infection including Behshahr, Kalaleh, Golidagh, Kalpoosh plain and Gonbad. Sunflower rust in Iran is considered as one of the important diseases which cause economic losses every few years. For instance, it caused 10 percent yield loss and 9.8 percent loss for oil yield. Genetic studies revealed that resistance is controlled by two dominant genes R1 and R2. By these identified genes, four physiological races of the pathogen became determinable. The presence of several resistant sunflower lines to rust with different origins reveals genetic variation for resistance to the disease. In this study, the variation of physiological races of sunflower rust was investigated to identify possible new races of the pathogen, Puccinia helianthi, and reaction of the host genotypes was also evaluated to the identified races.
Materials and Methods: Rust-infected leaf samples were collected from provinces Golestan and West Azarbayjan in 2010, and 8 isolates were inoculated on susceptible cultivar Record for physiological race identification purpose. Employing single pustule technique, the isolates were purified. The isolates after mass-production in separate chambers were inoculated on 9 standard differential lines. Inoculation and incubation methods were the same as for race identification procedure. The reaction of sunflower genotypes was evaluated by measuring pustule coverage percentage (PCP) according to computer-generated leaf diagrams depicting various percentages of leaf area covered with rust pustules. The interpreting resistance method proposed by Gulya and Masirevic (1995) was used in which three reaction patterns are defined as follows: immune (PCP= 0%), highly resistant (0.5%>PCP>0%) and susceptible (PCP.1%).
Results and Discussion: All collected isolates from the two main areas (i.e. Khoy and Golidagh) infected the non-resistant Perodovic cultivar indicating the pathogenicity of them. In addition, lines HA-335 and 803-1 were susceptible to all isolates. Lines RHA-265 and QHP1 demonstrated resistance to isolates collected from Golidagh, whereas the isolates of Khoy infected both lines. The results showed physiological differences between the main collection areas and presence of two dominant races. On the basis of pathogenicity similarities on common differential lines, races 302 and 300 were determined as dominant for Golidagh (Golestan) and Khoy (West Azarbayjan), respectively. Resistance evaluation of sunflower germplasm against rust disease was done under controlled greenhouse condition. The genotypes were tested by powdering the plants with mixture of the races' spore and Talc powder. The results demonstrated that 10 and 6 sunflower genotypes including hybrids Ghasem and Barzegar, their restorer lines and cultivar Gabor individuals were resistant against races 302 and 300, respectively.
Conclusions: Occurrence and distribution of physiological races of sunflower rust has importance in plant breeding research; as the process of breeding for resistant genotypes would be broken without considering the variation and distribution of the disease physiological races. In addition, genetic resistance to rust is controlled by dominant genes. Thus, access to new resistant sources in sunflower breeding is more likely. Among 23 lines and individuals of sunflower derived at the breeding processes, 16 resistant ones could help breeders to improve and release new hybrids or varieties containing resistance sources to the rust.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Differential Lines
  • Genotype
  • Isolate
  • Physiological Races
  • Resistance
1- Abbasi S., and Alizadeh A. 2000. Histological study of sunflower rust and identification of its race 3 in Mazandaran and Golestan provinces. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology. 36 (3-4): 207-219. (In Persian with English abstract)
2- Alizadeh A., and Abbasi S. 2001. Evaluation of some genetic materials for resistance to the prevalent race of Puccinia helianthi in Mzandaran and Golestan provinces. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology. 37 (1-2): 15-27. (In Persian with English abstract)
3- Bulos M., Ramos M.L., Altieri E., and Sala C.A. 2013. Molecular mapping of a sunflower rust resistance gene from HAR6. Breeding Science 63: 141–146.
4- Gulya T.J., and Masirevic S. 1995. Proposed methodologies for inoculation of sunflower with Puccinia helianthi and for disease assessment. The FAO European Research Network on Sunflower 31:31-47.
5- Gulya T.J., Kong G., and Brothers M. 2000. Rust resistance in wild Helianthus annuus and variation by geographic origin, P. I38-42, Proceedings of the 15th International Sunflower Conference, Toulouse, France.
6- Friskop A.J., Gulya T.J., Jordahl J., Ramsett M., Humann R., Acevedo M., Harveson R., and Markell S. 2012. Determination of Puccinia helianthi races in the United States Northern Great Plains. Proceedings of 18th International Sunflower Conference. 27 February-1 March. Mar del Plata, Argentina. Vol.2: 1-4.
7- Friskop A.J., Gulya T.J., Halley S.A., Schatz B.G., Schaefer J.P., Jordahl J.G., Meyer S.M., Misek K.W., Hendrickson P., and Markell S.G. 2015a. Effect of fungicide and timing of application on management of sunflower rust. Plant Disease. 99: 1210-1215.
8- Friskop A.J., Gulya T.J., Harveson R.M., Humann R.M., Acevedo M., and Markell S.G. 2015b. Phenotypic diversity of Puccinia helianthi (sunflower rust) in the United States from 2011 and 2012. Plant Disease. 99:1604-1609.
9- Jing L., Xu X., Jing J., Li L., and Navi S.S. 2015. Determination of physiological races and evaluation of sunflower for resistance to Puccinia helianthi Schw. Journal of Phytopathology 163: 507–512.
10- Kong G. 1999. Briefing notes for sunflower rust characterization. Information on techniques used for study of rust, P.5, Farming Systems Institute, Toowoomba, Queensland.
11- Lambrides C.J., and Miller J.F. 1994. Inheritance of rust resistance in a source of MC29 sunflower germplasm. Crop Science 34:1225-1230.
12- Madjidieh-Ghassemi Sh., Malihipour A., and Khiyawi M. 1995. Evaluation of tolerance in some sunflower cultivars to Puccinia helianthi Schw. in field condition. Proceedings of the 12th Iranian Plant Protection Congress. 2-7 September, Karaj, Iran. 116.
13- Miller J.F., Rodriquez R.H., and Gulya T.J. 1992. Evaluation of genetic materials for inheritance of resistance to race 4 rust in sunflower, P. 361-365, Proceedings of the 13th International Sunflower Conference, Pise, Italy.
14- Patil P.V., Kachapur M.R., and Anahosur K.H. 1998. Identification of physiological races of Puccinia helianthi in India. Indian Phytopathology 51(4):376-378.
15- Qi L.L., Gulya T., Seiler G.J., Hulke B.S., and Vick B.A. 2011a. Identification of resistance to new virulent races of rust in sunflowers and validation of DNA markers in the gene pool, Phytopathology 101:241- 249.
16- Qi L.L., Hulke B.S., Vick B.A., and Gulya T.J. 2011b. Molecular mapping of the rust resistance gene R4 to a large NBS-LRR cluster on linkage group 13 of sunflower, Theoritical Applied Genetics 123:351–358.
17- Rahmanpour S. 2010. Identification of physiological races of sunflower rust and reaction of the genotypes to the disease in Iran, P: 176-180, Proceedings of International Symposium of Sunflower Breeding on Resistance to Diseases, Krasnodar, Russia.
18- Rahmanpour S. 2004a. Study on the resistance to rust, Puccinia helianthi, in sunflower germplasm under controlled conditions. Proceedings of the 16th Iranian Plant Protection Congress. Tabriz, Iran. Vol. 2:294. (In Persian with English abstract)
19- Rahmanpour S. 2004b. An investigation on physiological variation in races of sunflower rust, Puccinia helianthi, and downy mildew, Plasmopara halstedii. Proceedings of the 16th Iranian Plant Protection Congress. Tabriz, Iran. Vol. 2:300. (In Persian with English abstract)
20- Rashid K.Y. 1992. New virulent pathotypes of sunflower rust in Canada, P. 772-778, Proceedings of the 13th International Sunflower Conference, Pise, Italy.
21- Sackston W.E. 1992. Managing the major sunflower diseases: From cultural practices to breeding for resistance, P. 667-669, Proceedings of the 13th International Sunflower Conference, Pise, Italy.
22- Sendall B.C., Kong G.A., Goulter K.C., Aitken E.A.B., Thompson S.M., Mitchell H.M., Kochman J.K., Lawson W., Shatte T., and Gulya T.J. 2006. Diversity in the sunflower: Puccinia helianthi pathosystem in Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology. 35:657–670.
23- Skoric D. 1988. Breeding for resistance to diseases and pests, Journal of Edible Oil Industry 25:25-40.
24- Tan A.S. 2010. Identification of rust (Puccinia helianthi Schw.) races in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in Turkey. Helia 33: 181-190.
25- Vicente P.M., and Zazzerini A. 1997. Identification of sunflower rust (Puccinia helianthi) physiological races in Mozambique. Helia 20(27):25-30.
CAPTCHA Image