@article { author = {Minbashi Moeini, M and Hadizadeh, M.H, and Karaminejad, M.R. and Sabet Zangeneh, H and Jamali, M and Haghighi, A,}, title = {Efficacy of Fluroxypyr Compared with Common Broadleaf Herbicides in the Wheat Fields}, journal = {Journal of Iranian Plant Protection Research}, volume = {36}, number = {3}, pages = {367-384}, year = {2022}, publisher = {Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, press.}, issn = {2980-8170}, eissn = {2783-5383}, doi = {10.22067/jpp.2022.74981.1074}, abstract = {IntroductionPlant Protection Organization (PPO) has registered 22 commercial herbicides formulations for weed control of wheat, barley and triticale in Iran. Among these herbicides, sixtheen herbicides introduced act as two proposed or only for broadleaved weeds. Their active ingredients including acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzyme inhibiting groups, synthetic-auxin groups,a photosynthetic inhibitor of photosystem II, and pigment synthesis inhibitor groups (Tomlin, 2009). Previous studies show that existing weed species do not similarly respond to herbicides and therefore the percentage control of some of the weed species is lower than the other species (Ohadi, 2010). These hard-to-control weeds are naturally tolerant to herbicides or may be developing resistant to one mode of action. Thus, we need new herbicides to suppress such weeds. The aim of this work was to find the best chemical treatments against weeds in wheat production based on using the new herbicide fluroxypyr and comparing their efficacy with commonly registered herbicides in the major wheat growing areas of Iran.Material and MethodA field study was conducted in four regions of Iran, including Karaj, Shahryar, Ahwaz, Shiraz, and Gonbad during 2017-2018 growing season. The statistical layout was a completely randomized block design with four replicates. Ten herbicides in 12 treatments were 2,4-D+MCPA (U46-Cambi fluid® 67.5%SL, 1.5 1 L ha-1), Mecoprop-p + Dichloprop-p + MCPA (Duplosan super® 60% SL , 1 L ha-1), Bromoxynil + MCPA (Bromicide® 40% EC, 1.5 L ha-1), Tribenuron-methyl (Granstar® 75% DF, 20 gr ha-1), Mesosulfuron-methyl + Iodosulfuron-methyl sodium+ Diflufenican+Mefenpyre-diethyl (Othello® 75% WG, 1.6 L ha-1), 2,4-D + Dicamba (Dialant super® 46.4 SL, 0.8 L ha-1), Triasulfuron + Dicamba (Lintur® 70% WG, 165 gr ha-1), Bromoxynil + 2,4-D (Buctrile Univeral® 56% EC 1.5 L ha-1), Dichloprop+bentazone (Basagran DP 56.6% SL, 2 L ha-1) and the new herbicide Fluroxypyr with th recommended doses (Kavin Flurox® 20% EC 1.5, 2 and 2.5 L ha-1). An unweeded treatment served as controls. Weed density and weed dry weight for each plot were measured four weeks after the last application the herbicides.  Wheat was harvested from six m2 of each plot after removing border plots. Wheat grain yield was determined after adjusting the moisture level of grain to 14 %. Data from each region were subjected to statistical analysis using SAS/STAT® statistical software and the means were separated by Duncan (α=5%).Results and DiscussionThe results showed a diverse spectrum of weeds (14 species) at the experimental locations. Descuriania Sophia was dominant in two tested locations Karaj and Shiraz. The next dominant weed species were Galium aparine L., Conringia orientali and Centaurea depressa M.B. were present dominantly in Shiraz. Polygonum aviculare, Fumaria vailantii and Veronica persica were present in Karaj. Lepyrodiclis holosteoides as a noxious weeds, were dominant only in Shahryar. Malva neglecta and Scorpiurus muricatus were in Ahwaz and Bifora testiculata was dominat in Gnbad. Across the experimental locations, fluroxypyr was efficient at 2-2.5 L ha-1 concentrations for weed control (85.77 to 90.68%). However, when applied at dosage of 1.5 L ha-1, total weed control efficiency was lower (80.75%). Bromoxynil + 2,4-D (85.43%) , Dichloprop-p + Bentazon (83.98%) were the most efficient after fluroxypyr. Mecoprop-p + Dichloprop-p + MCPA and Bromoxynil + MCPA with 80% average efficiency controled weeds in all the locations. Triasulfuron + Dicamba and 2,4-D + Dicamba were inefficient in weed control (67.75 and 68.22% , respectively) across all locations. These findings were in agreement with the results of some previous studies (Minbashi and Saeedi, 2019, Minbashi et al. 2020). Lepyrodiclis holosteoides with average control of 63.68% and CV= 23.98% was the most difficult-to-control weed in this experiment. Other weeds beside that were Scorpiurus muricatus, Polygonum aviculare, Malva neglecta and Bifora testiculata identified as difficult-to-control weeds. None of herbicides showed visual injury symptoms on wheat.ConclusionAccording to these experiments, we found that the Fluroxypyr (2-2.5 L ha-1) as new candidate herbicide showed good to excellent (85%-100%) weed control efficiency averaged in the all experimental locations and it could be recommended to be used in wheat field after registration process. Due to environmental concern, it should be applied at lower doses for non-difficult-to-control weeds. We found that Bromoxynil + 2,4-D was the most efficient next herbicide after fluroxypyr and Triasulfuron + Dicamba as an unefficient herbicide overall. L. holosteoides as the most hard-to-control weed was controlled only by upper dose (2.5 L ha-1) of new herbicide. Other difficult-to-control weed species were Scorpiurus muricatus, Polygonum aviculare, Malva neglecta and Bifora testiculata. }, keywords = {Density,Difficult-to-control,Dry weight,spectrum,Visual injury}, title_fa = {کارآیی فلوروکسی پیر در مقایسه با پهن برگ‌کش‌های رایج علیه علف‌های هرز مزارع گندم (Triticum aestivum L.)}, abstract_fa = {به منظور ارزیابی ‏فلوروکسی­پیر در کنترل علف­های هرز پهن برگ آزمایشی در قالب طرح بلوک‏های کامل تصادفی با چهار تکرار در مناطق کرج، شهریار، اهواز، شیراز و گنبدکاووس طی سال زراعی 97-1396 اجرا شد. تیمارها شامل کاربرد علف­کش­های توفوردی+ام­سی­پی­آ (5/1 لیتر در هکتار توفوردی کمبی­فلوئید)، تری بنورون متیل ( 20 گرم در هکتار گرانستار 75%)، مزوسولفورون‌متیل+ یدوسولفورون متیل سدیم+ دیفلوفنیکان+ مفن‌پایر‌دی‌اتیل (6/1 لیتر اتللو 6%)، مکوپروپ پی-دیکلوپروپ­پی+ام­سی­پی­آ (5/2 لیتر در هکتار دوپلسان سوپر60 %)، بروموکسینیل+ام­سی­پی­آ (5/1 لیتر در هکتار برومایسید ام­آ 40%)، توفوردی+ دایکامبا (8/0 لیتر در هکتار دیالان سوپر 4/34%)، تریاسولفورون+دایکامبا (165 گرم در هکتار لینتور %70)، بازاگران+ دیکلوپروپ (2 لیتر در هکتار بازاگران دی­پی6/56%)، بروموکسینیل+ توفوردی (5/1 لیتر بوکتریل یونیورسال 56%) و علف­کش جدید فلوروکسی­پیر (5/1، 2 و 5/2 لیتر در هکتار) بود. نتایج نشان داد فلوروکسی­پیر در مقدار 2 تا 5/2 لیتر در هکتار قادر به کنترل معنی­دار بیش از 80 درصد بیشتر علف­های هرز پهن برگ گندم بود و علاوه بر این برخی از گونه‌های پهن برگ را که توسط سایر پهن برگ‌کش‌های متداول کنترل نشده و یا به سختی کنترل می‌شوند نظیر پنیرک (Malva neglecta)، دم عقربی (Scorpiurus muricatus)، بی تی راخ (Galium tricurnatum)، گل گندم (Centaurea depressa) و سیزاب ایرانی (Veronica persica) را به خوبی کنترل کند. اما برای کنترل علف هرز سمجی نظیر ارشته خطایی (Lepyrodiclis holosteoides) و گشنیزک (Bifora testiculata) مقدار 5/2 لیتر در هکتار و رسیدن به عملکرد مطلوب در این محصول زراعی قابل توصیه است. هیچ یک از علف‌کش‌های آزمایش باعث خسارت ظاهری به گندم در مناطق مختلف آزمایش نشدند. با توجه به این که این علف­کش متعلق به گروه علف­کش­های شبه اکسینی از خانواده پیریدین کاربوکسیلیک اسید است و با بسیاری از از پهن برگ‌کش‌های مزارع گندم از لحاظ نحوه اثر متفاوت است به منظور جلوگیری از پدیده مقاومت به علف­کش­ها می‌تواند توصیه مناسبی برای این منظور نیز باشد.}, keywords_fa = {تراکم,دشوارکنترل,طیف علف‌هرز,گیاه‌سوزی,وزن خشک}, url = {https://jpp.um.ac.ir/article_42143.html}, eprint = {https://jpp.um.ac.ir/article_42143_9364f8bb994192a1032b6204d619888a.pdf} }